Loading page content
Preparing content…
SOC 23-1022
This is the neutral dispute resolution occupational group: arbitrators review the evidence and issue an award under the applicable procedure; mediators help the parties reach a voluntary agreement; U.S. conciliators usually meet the parties separately, and whether a recommendation binds the parties must be agreed in advance. Civil and commercial arbitration, people's mediation and labour dispute arbitration in China are governed by different laws, and the subpoena, oath or claim payment authority in the U.S. task list cannot be used directly for Chinese posts. U.S. BLS: about 10,500 posts in 2025, growth of 5% over 2025—2035, a net increase of about 500 and an annual average of about 300 openings; the May 2025 annual median wage is 75,530 US dollars. In China arbitrators are appointed under Articles 21—23 of the current Arbitration Law and are listed on specialist panels, and people's mediators are selected under Articles 13—14 of the People's Mediation Law. The U.S. figures are not a Chinese income or hiring promise.
Model impact index for three equally weighted representative core tasks; not a measured share of working time or a job-loss probability. floor((75+25+50)/3+0.5)=50; fermatmind-ai-impact-v1; 2026-10-18.
In one sentence: a neutral dispute handling post that takes disputes over contracts and other property rights and interests as its subject and, by reviewing materials, researching and applying the law, chairing hearings or mediation meetings, facilitating settlement or issuing an award and producing reviewable documents and records, delivers written opinions or awards, settlement agreements and procedural records; for mediation posts the outputs also include an agreement reached by the parties themselves.
Insufficient evidence: the national wage distribution for the exact occupation in China was not obtained this round. Current U.S. BLS basis: the May 2025 median annual wage is 75,530 US dollars; about 10,500 posts in 2025, growth of 5% over 2025—2035, a net increase of about 500 and an annual average of 300 openings. The older O*NET figures of 9,100 in 2024 and 3%—4% over 2024—2034 are used separately. Statutory appointment, the nature of the organisation and the pay for full-time and part-time work must be checked separately.
People who are more likely to adapt: those willing to do detailed work over the long term in document review, legal research and written output, able to keep records item by item where both precision and the consequences of error are demanding (65% consider precision or accuracy extremely important and 35% very important; 20% consider the consequences of error very serious and 30% serious), able to handle the demands of several parties at once and stay neutral and patient in conflict situations (45% face conflict situations every day and 20% at least once a week; 25% need to deal with unpleasant or angry people at least once a week), able to accept long hours of sitting from reading case files and writing hearing records (80% sit continually or almost continually, 47% work more than a 40-hour week and 63% have an irregular schedule), and able to disclose under procedures and withdraw in accordance with the law when under pressure from one party or where an interest relationship exists. The risk is usually greater for those who find it hard to accept that a conclusion may be challenged by the losing party or a party and may even enter setting-aside or review proceedings, who are unwilling to record the basis under procedures, or who lack a sense of boundaries about independence and confidentiality requirements.
This page corresponds to U.S. O*NET/BLS 23-1022.00. Arbitrators handle disputes and issue awards within the applicable authorization and procedure; mediators and conciliators help the parties communicate and reach a voluntary agreement and do not decide in their place. The shared tasks include reviewing materials, clarifying the issues, chairing meetings, writing documents and maintaining records. Civil and commercial arbitration in China follows the current Arbitration Law, and specialist arbitration such as labour arbitration follows separate law; people's mediation selects mediators and carries out work under the People's Mediation Law. U.S. BLS shows employment of about 10,500 in 2025, growth of 5% over 2025—2035 and 300 annual openings, and this O*NET update also shows 2025—2035; the exact EP figure of 4.7%, the rounded OOH figure of 5% and the ONET5—6% band are checked separately, and none is Chinese occupational statistics.
Career direction comparison
The table below compares the three directions within this occupation and three adjacent occupations, using the same comparison dimensions: occupational direction, core work and output, key differences, and who the choice suits better.
| Career direction | Core work and output | Key differences | Best-fit choice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Civil and commercial arbitration direction | Reviewing contracts and correspondence evidence, researching and applying the relevant law and precedent, chairing hearings to obtain evidence, ruling on objections and admissibility, making an award or organising mediation, and writing written opinions and procedural records. | Handles disputes over contracts and other property rights and interests between equal parties and hears them under the arbitration agreement and procedure; the finality of the award remains subject to statutory setting-aside and refusal-of-enforcement review. Labour disputes do not follow this qualification and finality rule. | People who are willing to study commercial law and the rules of evidence over the long term and who can bear responsibility for an award. |
AI impact on this career
The SVAMC2024 first edition of arbitration AI guidelines is industry advice, applicable according to the agreement of the parties and/or adoption by the tribunal or institution, and does not reduce statutory or other mandatory rules; it addresses tool limitations, confidentiality, verification of output and evidence integrity, the arbitrator not delegating personal adjudication duties and due process. It cannot prove the adoption rate for 23-1022, cross-task effects, wage and employment causality or Chinese statutory authorization; search, summaries and ledgers are editorial assistance checks, and the occupational projection is not attributed to AI. AI Impact Score 50% is an editorial estimate. Model impact index for three equally weighted representative core tasks; not a measured share of working time or a job-loss probability. floor((75+25+50)/3+0.5)=50; fermatmind-ai-impact-v1; 2026-10-18.The three tasks, ratings and sources are listed in the FermatMind method source record on this page.
FermatMind AI Impact Score estimation method v1
FermatMind / 费马测试 · 2026-10-18
Chinese mainland salary reference
The National Bureau of Statistics compiles by GB/T4754-2017 industry category and by the Occupational Classification Code job category. The classification of a specific institution must be checked against its actual main activity; this page did not verify a uniform Chinese occupational sub-category mapping for arbitration and mediation and provides no speculative code.
The China side of this page uses broad proxies for industry categories and job categories (leasing and business services, scientific research and technical services, education, and public administration, social security and social organizations), which are not a national wage distribution for this occupation; these categories cover many other posts, and industry figures must not be taken as this occupation's median. The National Bureau of Statistics compiles by corporate unit, excluding sole proprietors and the self-employed, whereas practice in arbitration and mediation includes appointed part-time work and per-case payment, so the statistical basis and the actual forms of practice differ.
Insufficient evidence: no national or city-level wage distribution for the exact occupation of arbitrators, mediators and conciliators has been obtained
U.S. salary reference
The May 2025 U.S. national occupational median annual wage is 75,530 US dollars, with the 10th and 90th percentiles at 47,220 and 155,440 US dollars. The wages exclude the self-employed and are not a starting salary, a case fee or Chinese pay; the actual post conditions require checking the state, institution, case field and form of employment.
| Position in the wage statistics | Annual wage reference | Boundaries of the conversion | How to understand this position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lowest 10% | 47,220 US dollars a year (hourly 22.70 US dollars) | Official annual wage, not an individual's monthly income | The 10th percentile is 47,220 US dollars a year, and a position in the distribution does not represent an assistant or a new entrant. |
| Median (50%) | 75,530 US dollars a year (median; hourly 36.31 US dollars) | Official annual wage, not an individual's take-home pay |
Occupational fit guide
This occupation is Arbitrators, Mediators, and Conciliators (O*NET 23-1022.00), with an interest code of ECS (Enterprising, Conventional, Social). Suitability judgements should look at observable behaviour: whether one can invest over the long term in case file reading, legal research and document writing (65% consider precision or accuracy extremely important and 35% very important), whether one can stay neutral and patient in conflict situations and multi-party communication (45% face conflict situations every day and 25% need to deal with unpleasant or angry people at least once a week but not every day), and whether one can adapt to long hours of sitting and irregular schedules (80% sit continually or almost continually, 47% work more than a 40-hour week and 63% have an irregular schedule). The editorial observations are not validated screening validity.
You may be better suited to： Suitability signals come from observable behaviour: whether one can invest over the long term in case file reading, legal research and document writing (65% consider precision or accuracy extremely important and 35% very important), whether one can stay neutral in conflict situations and multi-party communication (45% face conflict situations every day and 25% need to deal with unpleasant or angry people at least once a week but not every day), and whether one can adapt to long hours of sitting and irregular schedules (80% sit continually or almost continually, 47% work more than a 40-hour week and 63% have an irregular schedule). The interest code ECS (Enterprising, Conventional, Social) is a checkable starting point. The editorial observations are not validated screening validity.
Work pressure, risks and occupational boundaries
Editorially check selection and authorization, materials, procedure and records, privacy and independence, order at the venue and specialist facts; ordinary arbitration and people's mediation in China follow the law separately and cannot be replaced by a uniform qualification. The scenarios do not provide an accident rate, health causality, a ranking of risk by direction or a setting-aside or liability outcome.
Scope of evidence: O*NET 23-1022.00 provides tasks and work context (65% consider precision or accuracy extremely important and 35% very important; 20% consider the consequences very serious when an error is hard to correct and 30% fairly serious; 47% work more than a 40-hour week and 63% have an irregular schedule; 80% sit continually or almost continually; 45% face conflict situations every day and 25% need to deal with unpleasant or angry people at least once a week but not every day; 21% consider dealing with external customers or the public very important; 50% consider competition highly fierce). The mainland China side provides the Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China (revised 2025-09-12, in force from 2026-03-01) and the People's Mediation Law of the People's Republic of China (adopted 2010-08-28, in force from 2011-01-01) on selection, procedure and confidentiality. The risk scenarios, consequences and responses are editorial summaries; this page does not include accident rates or penalty amounts unsupported by sources. The U.S. proportions are not Chinese risk or event incidence rates.
Getting started, qualifications and career development
U.S. O*NET lists this occupation as Job Zone Five, SVP8.0 and above; 37% professional degree, 16% bachelor's and 11% post-baccalaureate certificate are respondent answers. Ordinary civil and commercial arbitration in China depends on institutional appointment and a specialist panel, and special foreign-related situations are checked separately under Article 82 of the Arbitration Law; people's mediation is selected in accordance with the law. These paths cannot substitute for one another.
Occupational prospects and moves to related occupations
BLS EP23-1022: from 10.5 thousand in 2025 to 11.0 thousand in 2035, an official net increase of 0.5 thousand / 4.7% and an annual average of 0.3 thousand openings; the OOH growth of 5% is rounded. This O*NET update also shows 2025—2035, employment of 10500 and 300 annual openings, and the 5—6% growth band is kept separately, without describing that band as the exact EP value or explaining the reason for the difference. O*NET2025 industries of 43% professional and technical / 29% government, the education of new hires of 37/16/11 and JobZone5 do not directly prove Chinese conditions. Chinese ordinary arbitration, people's mediation and specialist arbitration selection are checked separately; gaps in wages and recruitment and in the exact national projection are not filled with broad industry values. The actual tasks, qualifications and assessment of the adjacent directions are checked separately.
United States · exact (independent basis for this occupation)
EP4.7% / OOH5%; an annual average of 300
Reviewing case materials and evidence (checking contracts, certificates, records and correspondence and judging the admissibility and probative value of the evidence); researching and applying the relevant laws, regulations, policies and precedents and determining the scope of liability and the issues; chairing hearings to obtain information and evidence, or chairing mediation meetings to explain the procedure and the principles of confidentiality and voluntariness, identify each party's real needs and interests and promote communication; writing written opinions or awards and procedural records, preparing settlement agreements, recording the procedure and outcome and maintaining case files; and on specialist issues lawfully referring the matter to an expert and explaining the reasons for accepting the opinion. Mediators do not make an award but help the parties reach an agreement themselves on a voluntary basis.
Choose a real task from this page for a small practice project or a conversation with someone in the field. Use the planning guides to set a date, an output and feedback questions before deciding whether to continue.
This is the neutral dispute resolution occupational group: arbitrators review the evidence and issue an award under the applicable procedure; mediators help the parties reach a voluntary agreement; U.S. conciliators usually meet the parties separately, and whether a recommendation binds the parties must be agreed in advance. Civil and commercial arbitration, people's mediation and labour dispute arbitration in China are governed by different laws, and the subpoena, oath or claim payment authority in the U.S. task list cannot be used directly for Chinese posts. The usual outputs are an issues list, an evidence index, a procedural record, an arbitral award or an agreement between the parties. The scope of Chinese civil and commercial arbitration is disputes over contracts and other property rights and interests between equal parties; disputes over marriage, adoption, guardianship, maintenance and inheritance and administrative disputes that should be handled by administrative organs in accordance with the law cannot be arbitrated under that law. People's mediation handles civil disputes and charges no fee.
Three small self-test tasks: using public materials, write a procedural progress memorandum for a fictional contract price dispute (the matters in dispute, the applicable basis, the hearing or mediation steps to be taken, and the evidence to be supplied); using fictional materials, write an opening statement for a mediation meeting (explaining the procedure, the principles of confidentiality and voluntariness, the timetable and the next steps to the parties); and write up one mediation outcome as a 500-character explanation for the parties (including the reasons for settlement or failure, the key points of any agreement, and the further options). (Editorial suggestion, not a hiring, qualification examination or skills test, and not a description of the procedure of any arbitration institution or mediation organisation.)
The work of arbitrators, mediators and conciliators falls into four categories: dispute handling and procedural progress (holding an initial meeting with the disputing parties to explain the procedure and costs, chairing hearings or mediation meetings to obtain information and evidence, advancing procedural steps and deadlines, and determining the scope of liability under the evidence and the law and issuing an award or facilitating settlement); information gathering and evidence handling (reviewing claim applications, certificates and medical or employer records and similar materials, researching laws, regulations, policies and precedents, interviewing claimants, representatives or witnesses, and checking the chain and admissibility of the evidence); communication and negotiation (communicating with the disputing parties to clarify the issues and identify each party's real needs and interests, using mediation techniques to promote communication and understanding, guiding the parties to reach an agreement voluntarily, and negotiating on specialist disputes such as environmental ones); and documents and records (writing written opinions or awards, preparing settlement agreements, recording the procedure and outcome and maintaining case files).
Different dispute directions have different focuses; first check the applicable jurisdiction and authority, then review the evidence, hear the parties and produce documents.
Check the sources, procedure and reasons for the materials; keep confidentiality, disclose and withdraw in accordance with the applicable law, so that the documents are traceable and reviewable.
Arbitrators make awards and mediators facilitate an agreement between the parties, while U.S. conciliators usually meet them separately; these three roles cannot be merged into a single adjudicative power. Chinese courts exercise judicial adjudicative power, and lawyers provide representation services for the parties in accordance with the law; administrative decisions are made by the competent organs. Labour dispute arbitration follows dedicated legislation, and the qualification and finality rules of civil and commercial arbitration cannot be applied to it.
| Dimension | Primary track | Comparison track |
|---|---|---|
| Core purpose | Answer dispute handling and document delivery questions with whether the matters in dispute and the applicable procedure are stated, whether the review of the materials and evidence and their sources are reviewable, whether the applicable law and basis are explained, whether the facts found and the reasons are disclosed, and whether the procedural records are complete. | Within the scope of the engagement or appointment, complete the material review and application of the basis and chair the hearing or mediation, and deliver reviewable awards or agreement documents and procedural records. |
| Main subject matter and basis | The subject is disputes over contracts and other property rights and interests between equal parties (together with civil disputes that may be mediated in accordance with the law) and the evidence and interests involved; the basis is the relevant laws, regulations, policies and precedents (such as the substantive rules on contracts, company law, labour and social security, intellectual property and maritime affairs, and the procedural rules on arbitration and mediation), the contracts, certificates and records submitted by the parties, and the principles of voluntariness and confidentiality. | Chinese civil and commercial arbitration does not hear disputes over marriage, adoption, guardianship, maintenance and inheritance or administrative disputes that should be handled by administrative organs in accordance with the law; labour disputes, rural land contractual management disputes and sports arbitration follow dedicated legislation. Community family mediation is not the same as family arbitration. |
| Core process | Confirm the procedure and authority → Disclose conflicts and explain the rules → Collect materials and check the issues → Research the current basis and hear the parties → Hold the arbitration hearing or voluntary mediation → Issue the award or record the agreement and file it. | Case management systems, legal research and legislation databases, document and spreadsheet software, and online hearing or video conferencing tools can be used for material registration, precedent research, procedural step management and document drafting; some directions also use electronic case files and evidence organisation tools. Judgements about the admissibility of evidence, the finding of facts, the choice of the applicable law, mediation strategy and the conclusion remain the responsibility of the arbitrator or mediator and are recorded honestly, and tool output cannot replace procedural judgement and professional responsibility. |
| Main outputs | Written opinions or awards, settlement agreements or mediation agreements, hearing and mediation records, evidence lists and source notes, conclusions of legal and basis research, statements of the facts found and the reasons, procedural step and deadline records, and case files and filing lists. | Measured by whether the matters in dispute and the procedure are stated, whether the review of the materials and evidence is reviewable, whether the applicable basis and the reasons for the findings are explained, whether the principles of voluntariness and confidentiality are followed, and whether the documents and records are prepared and kept to standard, not by one party's satisfaction or a single outcome indicator. |
| Responsible party | Awards or agreements are made or facilitated by the arbitrator or mediator within the scope of the engagement; the hearing and adjudication of litigation cases are conducted by the people's court in accordance with the law; representation and legal opinions are provided by lawyers; administrative decisions are made by administrative organs in accordance with the law; notarial certification is made by notarial institutions; and the day-to-day management of labour relations is undertaken by the employer and the trade union. | Responsibilities are divided according to the scope of the engagement and the law and institutional standards; before starting, check the institution's establishment, registration and business scope, the appointment or selection conditions and panel arrangements (whether the conditions for arbitrators under the Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China or for people's mediators under the People's Mediation Law of the People's Republic of China are required), the procedural and confidentiality standards, the disclosure and withdrawal system for independence and conflicts of interest, the safety arrangements for court appearances or travel, and the retention and transfer requirements for case files. |
| Authority and approval | Dispute handling must follow the legal and procedural standards: procedural records, evidence or the basis must not be forged, and no award inconsistent with the facts and the law may be made; independence and neutrality must be maintained, and where an interest relationship exists or there is improper influence from one party the person must withdraw, disclose or decline as required; arbitration is conducted in private in accordance with the law unless the parties agree otherwise, mediation must follow the principles of confidentiality and voluntariness, and the identity of the parties, trade secrets and personal privacy must be handled in accordance with confidentiality and personal information protection requirements. | Ordinary civil and commercial arbitrators in China satisfy the standards of conduct and one of the five conditions under Articles 21—23 of the current Arbitration Law, are appointed by the institution and are listed on panels by specialism; special foreign-related arbitration in the circumstances limited by Article 82 is checked separately. People's mediators are selected under Articles 13—14 of the People's Mediation Law, and labour disputes follow separate legislation. There is no uniform national licence in the United States, but some states or courts require certification, training or a professional licence; the O*NET education survey is not a statutory qualification. |
| Boundaries of conclusions | An outcome applies only to the specific matters in dispute, procedure, parties and evidential conditions; the same dispute may yield different conclusions under a different procedure or different evidence, a mediation agreement presupposes that the parties reach it voluntarily, a single mediation outcome must not be presented as a general rule, and documents that have not taken effect or been confirmed must not be treated as effective conclusions. | When materials and statements conflict, the admissibility or authenticity of evidence is in doubt, a party does not agree to continue mediation, an undisclosed interest relationship exists or there is improper pressure from one party, the procedure should be suspended, the materials corrected or the limitations stated honestly, and withdrawal, disclosure or escalation should follow the law and institutional procedures, without improper handling because of case closure targets or performance pressure. |
Reviewing claim applications, contracts, certificates, birth or death certificates and medical or employer records and similar materials, communicating with the disputing parties to clarify the issues and identifying each party's real needs and interests.
Researching the relevant laws, regulations, policies and precedents, applying them to the facts of the case to reach a conclusion, and determining the scope of liability under the evidence and the law or administrative and judicial precedent.
Chairing hearings to obtain information or evidence and ruling on objections, motions and the admissibility of evidence, or chairing mediation meetings and using mediation techniques to promote communication and understanding.
Guiding the parties to reach an agreement voluntarily, preparing settlement agreements, and advising on accepting or rejecting a settlement proposal and authorising payment of a valid claim. The U.S. task combination includes different arbitration and mediation roles, and people's mediation does not authorise the payment of claims; whether a settlement recommendation binds the parties is checked against the specific role and jurisdiction.
Writing written opinions or awards stating the facts found, the basis and the reasons, writing case records and procedural documents, and preparing court or testimony materials as required.
Recording the progress and outcome of the procedure, organizing and filing case materials, researching whether appeal and setting-aside procedures meet the legal requirements, and keeping files according to the actual procedure without promising full traceability.
Check at least six things before starting: the work direction (labour and commercial arbitration, community and family mediation, administrative and public dispute mediation, environmental and natural resources dispute mediation and so on); the qualification and selection requirements (whether the conditions for arbitrators under the Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China are met and the person is listed on a panel by specialism, or the conditions for people's mediators under the People's Mediation Law of the People's Republic of China are met, and the institution's business scope and appointment arrangements); the working pattern and intensity (long hours of sitting from reading case files and writing hearing records (80% sit continually or almost continually), the workweek and schedule (47% more than 40 hours, 63% irregular) and travel arrangements); the record and compliance requirements (standards for keeping records of procedure and evidence, the system for independence and withdrawal and disclosure, and confidentiality and personal information processing requirements); the employment and income form (full-time institutional posts, part-time appointment, payment per case or per item and whether court appearances and travel allowances are included); and the development path (deeper specialisation, being listed on a panel and handling complex cases, moving into review and management posts, or moving to lawyer, labour relations and compliance roles).
| Community and family mediation direction | Accepting and chairing mediation, explaining the procedure and the principles of confidentiality and voluntariness, organising each party's claims, using mediation techniques to facilitate communication and agreement, drawing up the mediation agreement and following up its performance. | The disputes are mostly civil disputes such as family, neighbourhood, consumer and labour disputes; the focus is on multi-party communication, emotional reassurance and facilitating a voluntary agreement, with no award made and voluntariness of the parties as the principle. | People who are willing to do multi-party communication and patient guidance and who can face conflict and emotion over the long term. |
|---|
| Public affairs dispute coordination (specific authority checked separately) | Checking the procedural steps and the basis of authority, organising the policies and regulations, chairing coordination meetings or hearings, recording each party's views, writing explanations and handling recommendations and filing them. | The coordination of public matters requires first checking the statutory authority and dedicated rules of the accepting body. Administrative disputes cannot be arbitrated under the civil and commercial arbitration law; a mediation post does not thereby acquire administrative decision-making power. | People who are willing to check procedural compliance and organise the policy basis and to write clear explanations. |
|---|
| Judges, magistrates and justices of the peace (adjacent occupation) | Chairing the hearing and the court investigation, reviewing the evidence and applying the law, making a judgment or ruling and writing the adjudication document. | Covers litigation and adjudication; cases are heard and decided on the basis of state judicial power, the conclusion has judicial force, and the procedural and evidential rules are stricter. | People who are willing to hear and decide cases under court procedure and take responsibility for the judgment. |
|---|
| Lawyer (adjacent occupation) | Accepting instructions to provide legal opinions, draft and review documents, take part in negotiation and act in arbitration or litigation and protect the client's lawful rights and interests. | Covers one party; the focus is on representation, legal opinions and negotiation, and the position serves the client, unlike neutral adjudication. | People who are willing to assert the rights of one party and to do representation and negotiation. |
|---|
| Labour relations specialist (adjacent occupation) | Taking part in collective bargaining and labour contract management, handling employee grievances and labour relations disputes, running system and compliance training and keeping records. | Covers the internal side of the employer; the focus is on collective bargaining, labour contracts, employee relations and dispute prevention, representing the organisation's position and making no neutral award. | People who are willing to handle employee relations, collective bargaining and dispute prevention inside an organisation. |
|---|
Suggested order of choice: first decide the direction (labour and commercial arbitration, community and family mediation, or administrative and public dispute mediation), then check the selection conditions and the institution's business scope (whether one of the conditions for arbitrators under the Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China is met and the person is listed on a panel by specialism, or the conditions for people's mediators under the People's Mediation Law of the People's Republic of China are met; the institution's scope of acceptance and handling arrangements), and finally confirm the working pattern and intensity, the record-keeping and confidentiality requirements, the employment and income form and the development path. All directions share material review, application of the basis, chairing hearings or mediation and document writing skills; moving to an adjacent occupation requires filling gaps in different abilities and qualifications (court litigation procedure and adjudication rules, representation and legal opinions, labour relations and collective bargaining, compliance and regulatory rules, and legal document and research support), and the systems of responsibility differ, so a direct transfer is not possible.
After deciding on a direction, check the selection and handling requirements that actually exist in each direction (whether the conditions for arbitrators under the Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China are met and the person is listed on a panel by specialism, or the conditions for people's mediators under the People's Mediation Law of the People's Republic of China are met; the institution's scope of acceptance and handling arrangements), the requirements of dedicated rules such as foreign-related and maritime affairs, and the confidentiality, personal information processing and file retention requirements.
Editorial ratings use the existing occupational responsibilities and AI task analysis on this page. They are not adoption rates, measured effects, job-disappearance or personal-unemployment probabilities, or official scores from Stanford or another external institution. No measured time weights or future robot deployment are assumed.
Technically: legal and regulatory databases can be used to search precedents and provisions; text tools can be used for material summarising and classification and document drafts; case management systems can be used for deadline reminders, ledgers and file cataloguing. These are assistance capabilities, and the output still requires verification against the case evidence, the parties' statements and the current law before it can be used for procedural and substantive judgements, and cannot replace chairing, communication or responsibility. Technical feasibility is not the same as adoption.
Editorially check tool use against the actual systems, permissions, institutions and procedures; the SVAMC guidelines are background advice after adoption and do not prove the degree of adoption across this occupation; AI use disclosure is checked against the specific procedure and is not the same as the Chinese written disclosure duty for interest relationships.
BLS EP23-1022: from 10.5 thousand in 2025 to 11.0 thousand in 2035, an official net increase of 0.5 thousand / 4.7% and an annual average of 0.3 thousand openings; the OOH growth of 5% is rounded. This O*NET update also shows 2025—2035, employment of 10500 and 300 annual openings, and the 5—6% growth band is kept separately, without describing that band as the exact EP value or explaining the reason for the difference. Changes in the number of jobs are not inferred as AI causality from task assistance or software.
| Work area | Task | Current change | Human control point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material review and application of the basis | Reviewing case materials and evidence, researching and applying the law and precedent, chairing hearings or mediation meetings and recording the procedure. | Legal and precedent search and material summarising can be assisted, but judgements about the authenticity and admissibility of evidence and the choice of the basis must still be made by a person (editorial suggestion, in the absence of post-level adoption research). | Reviewing the evidence and finding the facts, choosing and applying the law, chairing the hearing or mediation and facilitating agreement, and taking responsibility for the award or agreement and the procedural records. |
| Dispute handling and procedural progress | Chairing hearings or mediation meetings to obtain information and evidence and facilitating a voluntary agreement between the parties or making an award. | Meeting arrangements and deadline reminders can use tools, but the chairing judgement, the communication and the conclusion must still be made by a person (editorial suggestion). | Judging the focus of the dispute and the sufficiency of the evidence and deciding how to advance the procedure and which materials still need to be supplied. |
| Documents and records management | Writing written opinions or awards and procedural records and organizing and filing case materials. | Document drafts and file cataloguing can be assisted, but the reasons for the findings and responsibility for the conclusion must still be borne by a person (editorial suggestion). | Confirming that the procedure is lawful, that the parties' wishes are genuine and that the parties understand the content and consequences of the agreement. |
| Procedural explanation and court preparation | Taking part in court proceedings or explaining the basis for the handling of the case to a higher level or a review stage. | Organizing and indexing materials can be automated, but the procedural explanation and the court statement must still be made by a person (editorial suggestion). | Confirming that the basis is sufficient, that the facts found and the reasons are stated and that the documents are signed and filed as required. |
| Confidentiality and independence management | Handling party and case materials and controlling the scope of use in accordance with the confidentiality and personal information protection requirements. | Permission and redaction management can use tools, but the judgement of sensitive information and the handling of independence conflicts must still be borne by a person (editorial suggestion). | Judging whether the materials fall within the sensitive or protected range and deciding the extent to which they may be disclosed. |
| Independence and conflict of interest management | Check for interest relationships before accepting a case and, where a conflict arises, disclose under the law and institutional standards and withdraw in accordance with the law. | Information comparison can use tools, but the judgement of independence and the decision to withdraw must be made by a person and recorded (editorial suggestion). | Check relationships and disclose promptly in writing; where withdrawal is mandatory, apply or act under the law, with the withdrawal decision made by the competent body. |
| Records and archive management | Editorially maintain the procedural records and versions and keep them according to the real institution and jurisdiction; the task materials and legal sources do not guarantee that all historical conclusions are fully traceable. | Archive retrieval and digitisation can be automated, but the truthfulness of what is registered and the compliance of filing must still be checked by a person (editorial suggestion). | Organizing procedural records and documents and filing and keeping them as the institution's archive requirements require. |
The five data cards support U.S. tasks, wages, the projection, the education of new hires and recruitment software demand, and are not five independent AI studies; the SVAMC2024 guidelines background is added, applicable within the scope of consent or adoption, and occupational adoption and effect causality are still missing.
The table below contains editorial checks on assistance scenarios for search, documents and ledgers, and is not a result for the degree of automation impact or comparative effects by direction.
AI primarily changesLegal and precedent search, material summarising and classification, procedural deadline ledgers and document drafts can be assisted.
Human responsibility remainsCheck the authenticity and admissibility of evidence, judge whether the choice of the applicable law and the reasons for the findings hold and keep records.
AI primarily changesCase ledger registration, deadline reminders and file cataloguing can be automated.
Human responsibility remainsJudge whether the materials and statements are consistent, whether the chain of evidence is complete and whether the procedural records are to standard, and disclose the uncertainties.
AI primarily changesSearching for legislative updates and compiling the gist of adjudication documents can be assisted.
Human responsibility remainsChairing and communication in hearings or mediation, the choice of the finding of facts and the applicable law, and responsibility for the award or agreement.
The five steps below are an editorially suggested process for separating tool capability, human review and authorization; it is not a mandatory process imposed by regulators or institutions.
First confirm the matters in dispute and the applicable procedure, the standards for keeping records of procedure and evidence, and the confidentiality and personal information processing requirements for case materials and party information, and make clear which judgements must be borne by the arbitrator or mediator personally.
Handle redacted materials, searches, summaries, deadline reminders and drafts only within the scope the institution permits; the output must not be written directly into a finding of fact, a legal conclusion or a formal award without verification.
The arbitrator or mediator checks the tool output against the evidence, the parties' statements and the actual legal position, reviews the parties, subject matter, amounts, periods and basis, and records the human judgement and the reasons for any changes.
Articles 60 and 67 of the Chinese Arbitration Law govern the signature and sealing of hearing transcripts and award documents, and Articles 27—30 of the People's Mediation Law govern the recording and filing of records and written or oral agreements; editorially also check versions and retention, without promising full traceability, and a written agreement is not uniformly required for people's mediation.
Ordinary arbitration, people's mediation and specialist arbitration in China each require separate checks of personnel, procedure and authorization, and people's mediation does not decide in the parties' place. Article 40 of the Arbitration Law allows the appointment of a lawyer or other representative, so all representation and legal opinions must not be written exclusively as being provided by lawyers.
Writing tool-generated search results or document drafts directly into the procedure lets unchecked judgements be treated as confirmed facts.
Control: Before making a procedural decision or issuing a document, the arbitrator or mediator checks that the content matches the evidence and the parties' statements and explains the basis and the uncertainties.
Party identity, trade secrets, personal privacy and case materials are sensitive information, and disclosing them creates privacy and compliance risks.
Control: Editorially check the material permissions under the law, the engagement and the institution, and a general reference to redaction cannot replace confidentiality. SVAMC guideline 2 requires, within its scope of application, appropriate checking or authorization before confidential materials are uploaded, which cannot be extended into a blanket prohibition on transferring all materials or into a general rule of Chinese law.
Procedural records and the basis need to be reviewable, and tool output without version and source notes will be hard to trace.
Control: Keep the original records and document versions, noting the search date and the traces of human modification of tool output.
Editorially check the names, amounts, periods and the original materials behind the basis; the specific procedural, substantive or documentary effect must follow the real facts and the law, and a field error is not judged directly to invalidate an award.
Control: Check item by item against the evidence, the parties' statements and the research conclusions, and on finding a discrepancy review it immediately and record the correction.
Responsibility for procedural decisions and for the award or agreement must be attributable.
Control: Articles 45—48 of the Chinese Arbitration Law govern prompt written disclosure to the institution and statutory withdrawal, with the decision made by the competent body; people's mediation is checked against its own statutory selection and neutrality duties, and arbitration procedure is not applied uniformly to it.
First check the selection conditions against public information from the judicial administration departments, arbitration institutions, people's mediation organisations and institutions of learning (whether one of the conditions for arbitrators under the Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China is met, or the conditions for people's mediators under the People's Mediation Law of the People's Republic of China are met), build a solid foundation in law, procedure and evidence and become familiar with case material review, hearing or mediation chairing and document writing through an internship; do not trust guarantees of a pass or of affiliation from unofficial bodies, and do not take part in arrangements involving sitting an examination for someone else or signing documents on their behalf.
Check tool-generated precedent searches, material summaries and document drafts against the case evidence, the parties' statements and the actual legal position, confirm before issuing an award or preparing an agreement that the parties, the subject matter, the amounts and the periods are true, and do not treat tool output directly as a finding.
Editorially check the actual tools, material permissions, versions and the review division of work, and do not promise that the whole procedure is traceable. The SVAMC guidelines apply within their scope of adoption for confidentiality and personal adjudication duties; in China the arbitral tribunal's award and the voluntary people's mediation agreement are borne separately in accordance with the law, and no adjudicative power is given to mediators.
Focus training on the application of the law and procedural standards and the rules of evidence, organising the facts in dispute and document writing, and chairing and communication skills in hearings or mediation, and strengthen awareness of the critical use of automated search and generated content and awareness of error.
The SVAMC2024 first edition of arbitration AI guidelines is industry advice, applicable according to the agreement of the parties and/or adoption by the tribunal or institution, and does not reduce statutory or other mandatory rules; it addresses tool limitations, confidentiality, verification of output and evidence integrity, the arbitrator not delegating personal adjudication duties and due process. No whole-occupation substitution rate or wage and employment causality was obtained, so job replacement cannot be judged from the guidelines or the projection; arbitration, people's mediation and other dispute resolution responsibilities are checked separately in accordance with the law.
Source: The current BLS 2025—2035 occupational projection; the original Chinese text on the boundaries of responsibility is in the qualifications and risk sections of this page.Original source ↗
The occupational materials this round do not support a uniform conclusion that programming is an entry requirement or that it is not needed; check against the specific institution, system and data duties, and a software list or guidelines do not prove the same skill requirement for all posts.
Source: O*NET 23-1022.00 tasks and work activities (editorial note)Original source ↗
Editorially check the specific legal databases, case management, ledger and document systems and permissions; the fact that tasks involve information processing does not mean the degree of digitisation or the AI impact has been quantified, and the SVAMC guidelines do not provide a ranking of impact.
Source: O*NET 23-1022.00 task description (editorial summary)Original source ↗
BLS expects this occupation to grow 5% over 2025—2035, with a net increase of about 500 jobs and an annual average of about 300 openings; openings include replacements from departures and job changes and are not a net increase of 300 each year. The U.S. education and experience are occupational background, and Chinese appointment is checked separately against the statutory conditions. Whether to enter can be considered together with case file reading, accurate recording, conflict communication and irregular schedules; these statistics do not provide an individual employment prediction.
Source: The BLS EP and OOH and this O*NET 2025—2035 occupational material, not an individual employment or AI causal prediction.Original source ↗
Tools can assist with search, classification or drafts. Civil and commercial arbitration in China is heard and decided by an arbitral tribunal constituted in accordance with the law, and a mediation agreement depends on the voluntariness of both parties; AI output cannot replace the statutory personnel, the parties' views or responsibility. Arbitrators must promptly disclose in writing circumstances that may affect their independence and impartiality; the withdrawal decision is made by the competent body under Article 48, not by a tool or by the person themselves.
Source: The Chinese boundaries of responsibility are based on the Arbitration Law and the People's Mediation Law, with the original text in the qualifications and risk sections of this page; this link only checks the U.S. occupational role.Original source ↗
No disappearance year for 23-1022 was obtained this round, so no year is filled in and the 2035 projection endpoint is not treated as the disappearance time. The BLS occupational projection and the SVAMC industry AI advice do not prove an adoption rate, whole-occupation substitution or wage and employment causality.
Source: BLS employment projection (notes on the boundaries of the official material)Original source ↗
Give priority to learning the application of the law and procedural standards and the rules of evidence, organising the facts in dispute and document writing, and chairing and communication skills in hearings or mediation; if you intend to work in arbitration or people's mediation in mainland China, you must meet the conditions for arbitrators under the Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China and be listed on a panel by specialism, or meet the conditions for people's mediators under the People's Mediation Law of the People's Republic of China; the specific requirements are subject to the rules of the judicial administration departments and institutions and to information from institutions of learning.
Source: The original Chinese qualification text is in the qualifications and sources section of this page; this link only provides the BLS U.S. education and occupational background.Original source ↗
The above separates automation capability, actual deployment and employment outcomes; the next section gives mainland China salary references and notes on their statistical scope.
Insufficient evidence: this occupation is not listed separately; the 2025 non-private averages of 110,162 yuan for leasing and business services and 119,465 yuan for public administration and similar are industry references.
Insufficient evidence: no comparable occupational wage sample for full-time, part-time and per-case work was obtained; part-time wages paid by corporate units may be included in the statistics, so it cannot be asserted that all part-time work is excluded.
Scenario comparisons require the work direction, the nature of the institution, the selection conditions and scope of handling, and the case intake and payment method and the region to match; an industry proxy cannot replace written pay conditions.
| Education background | Candidate job directions (editorial checks) | Notes and checks suggested |
|---|---|---|
| Education must be checked against the specific support post | Assistant and clerical support in arbitration institutions and mediation organisations | At the assistant stage the work is mainly registering case materials, tracking procedural steps and organizing documents and files; cases are handled by arbitrators or people's mediators who meet the corresponding conditions, and the individual can only assist within the scope of authorization. |
| Civil and commercial arbitration and people's mediation conditions are checked separately | Arbitrators, people's mediators and handling cases | Under the Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China, appointed by an arbitration institution and meeting one of the statutory conditions and listed on the arbitrator panel by specialism; people's mediators are served by committee members and appointed persons under the People's Mediation Law of the People's Republic of China; the U.S. O*NET shows respondent answers of 37% considering a professional degree necessary and 16% a bachelor's degree. |
| Specialist research and the foreign-related direction are checked separately | Institutional review and specialist research and complex cases | Insufficient evidence: no recruitment sample supporting a uniform master's threshold for this occupation was obtained. Specialist research, language and complex case ability are preparation directions, and an education level cannot replace the statutory practice years and appointment. |
| Education and programme requirements vary with institution and case type (corporate, specialist fields and foreign-related cases) | In-house dispute management and corporate legal and labour and personnel posts | The education, training and authority of corporate or specialist posts are checked against the real notice and business; this round obtained no occupation-level preference, factor ranking or uniform threshold, and no general claim is made that experience and languages matter more. |
When checking your expectations, first confirm the work direction (labour and commercial arbitration, community and family mediation, administrative and public dispute mediation, environmental and natural resources dispute mediation), the nature of the institution (arbitration institution, people's mediation organisation, enterprise and law firm, research and consultancy body) and the form of employment (full time, appointed part-time or per-case payment), and whether court appearances and travel allowances are included; do not use an industry proxy in place of written pay conditions, and do not convert the U.S. figures into an expected amount in yuan.
The statistical scope of this category can be consulted; the industry registration of specific institutions was not verified, and no claim is made that arbitration institutions are concentrated in this category.
This category covers many kinds of professional posts and does not prove that legal research institutions are uniformly classified under it.
The category mean does not cover all people's mediator allowances or part-time income; the specific employment and payment relationship must be checked.
Editorially check the direction, institution, one's own appointment conditions, authority, actual salary or per-case payment, benefits and region; this round obtained no causal quantification of these factors on occupational wage differences. The SVAMC AI advice and search assistance do not prove a pay rise or cut.
| Median: 75,530 US dollars a year (May 2025), the midpoint of the distribution rather than a starting salary. |
| Highest 10% | 155,440 US dollars a year (hourly 74.73 US dollars) | Official annual wage, not an individual's take-home pay | The 90th percentile is 155,440 US dollars a year; there is no evidence to assign this percentile uniformly to senior arbitrators, foreign-related posts or heads of institutions. |
|---|
Pay · 10th percentile：47,220 US dollars a year (P10)；The 10th annual percentile, which O*NET states as 10% not exceeding this value (hourly 22.70 US dollars), a position in the statistical distribution that does not represent a starting salary or a minimum wage；BLS May 2025 wage percentiles shown on the O*NET 23-1022.00 page
Pay · 25th percentile：57,360 US dollars a year；The 25th annual percentile (hourly 27.58 US dollars)；BLS May 2025 wage percentiles shown on the O*NET 23-1022.00 page
Pay · median：75,530 US dollars a year；The May 2025 occupational annual median wage, part of the same BLS wage data series and not two independent surveys；BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook
Pay · 75th percentile：108,000 US dollars a year；The 75th annual percentile (hourly 51.92 US dollars)；BLS May 2025 wage percentiles shown on the O*NET 23-1022.00 page
Pay · 90th percentile：155,440 US dollars a year (P90)；The May 2025 90th annual percentile； it does not provide a correspondence between an individual's qualification, seniority or being the head of an institution and a high income；O*NET national wage percentiles
The median is the midpoint of the national wage distribution, not a starting salary. The 10th or 90th percentile carries no label of new entrant or head of institution, and an individual's income cannot be inferred from the percentile.
No. The hourly and annual figures are two expressions of the same statistical distribution (a median of 36.31 US dollars an hour corresponding to 75,530 US dollars a year), and the OEWS annual conversion follows statistical assumptions; this occupation involves appointed part-time work and per-case payment, and an individual's actual full-year income cannot be calculated without the individual's hours and contract conditions.
The national wage percentile values come from May 2025 OEWS shown through O*NET, and the industry medians and the current 2025—2035 employment projection come from the BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook; repeated presentation of the same BLS wage series is not an independent sample.
No. The U.S. figures are U.S. occupational statistics and are not the same system as the Chinese industry category and job category proxies on this page; the two cannot be extrapolated from each other or converted into an expected amount in yuan.
| Industry | Occupational wage median within this industry | How to understand this value |
|---|---|---|
| Local government (excluding education and hospitals) | 92,790 US dollars a year | The BLS May 2025 occupational median within this industry, with an industry employment share of 15%. |
| State government (excluding education and hospitals) | 81,330 US dollars a year | The BLS May 2025 occupational median within this industry, with an industry employment share of 13%. |
| Other professional, scientific and technical services | 75,620 US dollars a year | The BLS May 2025 occupational median within this industry, with an industry employment share of 9%. |
| Legal services | 71,430 US dollars a year | The BLS May 2025 occupational median within this industry, with an industry employment share of 33%; it is not the wage of all occupations in the industry. |
In the U.S. survey, 47% work more than a 40-hour week, 32% 40 hours and 21% fewer than 40 hours as contexts; the wage percentiles are not an individual's full-year take-home pay, and this round obtained no comparison of full-time/part-time or per-case pay differences.
Editorially check the case intake, fixed salary or per-case payment, actual settlement, contract and expenses; the 63% with an irregular schedule does not prove the pay distribution or a specific causal effect of economic activity or dispute volume on income.
In the U.S. survey, 80% sit continually or almost continually, 47% work more than a 40-hour week, 45% face daily conflict and competition is 50% highly / 20% moderately competitive, which is respondent background rather than shares of hours; this round obtained no long-term sustainability, health or accident causality.
The BLS projection base-period headcount； it includes self-employed employment and differs in scope from the wage survey；BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook
Employment from 10.5 thousand in 2025 to 11.0 thousand in 2035, an official EP net increase of 0.5 thousand / 4.7% and 0.3 thousand annual openings, with the OOH growth of 5% rounded； not a guarantee of individual employment.
An annual average of about 300 openings over 2025—2035, including replacement demand from occupational exits and retirement, and it cannot be described as consistent with older data periods；BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook
Do an entry exercise： Do an alternative preparation: using public materials, write a procedural progress memorandum for a fictional contract price dispute (the matters in dispute, the applicable basis, the hearing or mediation steps to be taken and the evidence to be supplied), write an opening statement for a mediation meeting (the procedure, the principles of confidentiality and voluntariness, the timetable and the next steps), and write up one mediation outcome as a 500-character explanation for the parties (including the reasons for settlement or failure, the key points of any agreement and the further options). This does not constitute a skills test, an examination opinion or an appointment test and cannot replace legal education and the selection conditions.
Which Holland interest type is closer to arbitrators, mediators and conciliators?
The O*NET 23-1022.00 interest code is ECS (Enterprising, Conventional, Social): the Enterprising dimension corresponds to activities that negotiate, persuade and lead or advise others in commercial and legal settings, the Conventional dimension to activities that organize information and data according to procedures and rules, and the Social dimension to activities that help, advise and provide services to others. The combination of the three interests corresponds to a neutral dispute handling post that must work strictly to legal and procedural standards, communicate and negotiate with several parties and read and write documents; but suitability is decided by legal, procedural and evidential ability, document writing standards and the selection conditions.
Do not use it this way: Treating the interest code as a basis for appointment or selection; interest is not the same as legal and procedural ability, the ability to chair a hearing or mediation, or document writing ability.
Test my Holland occupational interestsWhich Big Five traits are more relevant to this work?
The Big Five is for self-exploration only. This page obtained no dedicated validation of personality scores against work performance in arbitration or mediation posts; what can be observed is whether the person records honestly, verifies evidence and stays neutral when challenged. Labels must not be used for appointment decisions.
Do not use it this way: Replacing real legal training and selection conditions with a personality label.
See my Big Five personality traitsCan MBTI be used to judge whether I am suited to being an arbitrator, mediator or conciliator?
MBTI is not an occupational matching tool, and there is no evidence supporting the claim that a particular type is best suited to arbitration or mediation; suitability is decided by legal and procedural ability, practical experience and document and record keeping.
Do not use it this way: Replacing real legal experience and selection conditions with a type label.
Understand my MBTI preferencesCan the Enneagram show whether I am suited to this occupation?
The Enneagram is likewise a self-exploration tool and cannot judge whether you are suited to this occupation; entry depends on legal or related professional education and practical experience (on the mainland China side, meeting the conditions for arbitrators under the Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China and being listed on a panel by specialism, or meeting the conditions for people's mediators under the People's Mediation Law of the People's Republic of China) as well as material review and document writing ability.
Do not use it this way: Editorially check the actual response and improvement after a setback, and do not judge competence by a type label; this round obtained no causal evidence that type explanations reduce improvement opportunities.
Explore my Enneagram patternsIf I am not good at maths, can I be an arbitrator, mediator or conciliator?
Editorially check the specific preparation in material reading, logic, documents and numbers; this round O*NET does not provide an IQ selection threshold, and no factor ranking or training effect was obtained, so no claim is made that there is no uniform threshold anywhere in the world.
Do not use it this way: Editorially check the specific preparation in reading, logic and documents, and do not judge competence from a single score; this round obtained no training intervention effect for this occupation.
Understand my intelligence and reasoning performanceDo arbitrators, mediators and conciliators need high emotional intelligence?
Editorially observe communication with both sides, the procedural explanation and the genuine response under pressure; the O*NET figures of 21% very important and 16% important for public contact do not prove an emotional intelligence entry requirement or competence validity. Arbitrator disclosure and withdrawal and mediator neutrality are checked separately under the law.
Do not use it this way: Changing the facts found, the basis or the conclusion because of case closure pressure or one party's demands.
Understand my emotional intelligenceFits better when: Editorial interest check: whether you are willing to hear and decide cases under judicial procedure and take responsibility for the judgment. The specific training, conditions and authority are checked separately, and interest does not determine suitability.
Watch for: Editorial comparison: cases are heard and decided under state judicial power and the conclusion has judicial force; if you prefer to handle disputes on the basis of the parties' agreement, you need to understand the voluntariness and finality features of arbitration and mediation. The real roles may intersect, and the jurisdiction, institution and qualifications are each checked separately, so no exclusive conclusion is drawn for all posts.
Explore related career: Judges, magistrates and justices of the peaceFits better when: Editorial interest check: whether you are willing to hear disputes and write rulings within administrative procedure. The specific training, conditions and authority are checked separately, and interest does not determine suitability.
Watch for: Editorial comparison: it centres on the administrative organ's adjudicative procedure and deals with administrative disputes rather than disputes over contracts and property rights and interests between equal parties, with different authority and basis. The real roles may intersect, and the jurisdiction, institution and qualifications are each checked separately, so no exclusive conclusion is drawn for all posts.
Explore related career: Administrative law judgeFits better when: Editorial interest check: whether you are willing to assert the rights of one party and to do representation and negotiation. The specific training, conditions and authority are checked separately, and interest does not determine suitability.
Watch for: Editorial comparison: it centres on representation, legal opinions and negotiation and its position serves the client; it differs from neutral arbitration and mediation work and requires additional neutrality and procedural chairing ability. The real roles may intersect, and the jurisdiction, institution and qualifications are each checked separately, so no exclusive conclusion is drawn for all posts.
Explore related career: LawyerFits better when: Editorial interest check: whether you are willing to handle employee relations, collective bargaining and dispute prevention inside an organisation. The specific training, conditions and authority are checked separately, and interest does not determine suitability.
Watch for: Editorial comparison: it represents the organisation in handling labour relations inside the employer and preventing disputes, and whether the role also handles dispute resolution is checked separately, with trade union and collective bargaining ability the main gap to fill. The real roles may intersect, and the jurisdiction, institution and qualifications are each checked separately, so no exclusive conclusion is drawn for all posts.
Explore related career: Labour relations specialistFits better when: Editorial interest check: whether you are willing to do legal research and document and case file management support. The specific training, conditions and authority are checked separately, and interest does not determine suitability.
Watch for: Editorial comparison: it mainly assists lawyers with research, documents and material organization, and whether the role also chairs or decides is checked separately; handling cases requires separately meeting the selection conditions. The real roles may intersect, and the jurisdiction, institution and qualifications are each checked separately, so no exclusive conclusion is drawn for all posts.
Explore related career: Paralegals and legal assistantsFits better when: Editorial interest check: whether you are willing to organize compliance rules and follow up internal review and rectification. The specific training, conditions and authority are checked separately, and interest does not determine suitability.
Watch for: Editorial comparison: it mainly implements internal compliance and regulatory requirements within an organisation and focuses on whether there is a violation and how to rectify it, rather than neutrally handling a dispute between parties. The real roles may intersect, and the jurisdiction, institution and qualifications are each checked separately, so no exclusive conclusion is drawn for all posts.
Explore related career: Compliance officersEditorially check preparation through the genuine behaviour of verifying materials, recording honestly and stating limitations; this round obtained no reliability or selection predictive validity for it, and no conclusion is drawn from personality.
This round obtained no occupation-level validity evidence on introversion and competence or selection; editorially check the specific tasks: arbitration and mediation work involves a great deal of independent case file reading and document writing time, but chairing hearings or mediation, explaining the procedure and multi-party communication require actively contacting the parties and representatives (11% have face-to-face discussions every day, 21% have telephone conversations every day and 45% face conflict situations every day).
Neither extraversion nor introversion guarantees competence. First observe in practice whether the person can listen to both sides, calmly restate the issues and complete material reading and document review independently.
No. MBTI is not an occupational matching tool or a basis for selection.
The O*NET 23-1022.00 interest code is ECS (Enterprising, Conventional, Social); the interest code only describes tendencies in the work content, not a personal diagnosis.
This page obtained no dedicated validation of personality scores against work performance in this occupation. Observe the actual performance in material reading, listening and document review, and do not use personality scores in place of the selection conditions.
Editorially check the specific preparation in reading, reasoning, expression and recomputation; this round obtained no IQ hiring threshold or training effect, so no claim is made that there is no threshold anywhere in the world.
Editorially check the genuine response in conflict between the parties, under pressure or where the materials are in doubt; this round obtained no uniform communication or stress-resistance threshold or factor ranking, and the qualifications and actual job conditions are checked separately.
No. The Enneagram is a self-exploration tool and does not constitute evidence of occupational fit.
First check the selection conditions against public information from the judicial administration departments, arbitration institutions, people's mediation organisations and institutions of learning (whether one of the conditions for arbitrators under the Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China is met, or the conditions for people's mediators under the People's Mediation Law of the People's Republic of China are met), then use public or simulated materials to practise writing a procedural progress memorandum, an opening statement for a mediation meeting and a 500-character explanation for the parties, and ask an experienced person to review them, in order to test your own material review ability, logic in applying the basis and document writing expression; do not trust guarantees of a pass or of affiliation from unofficial bodies, and do not take part in arrangements involving sitting an examination for someone else or signing documents on their behalf.
Typical scenario：Advancing the procedure without written confirmation of the procedure, fees and time limits, or changing the procedure without notifying the parties.
Roles most affected：All arbitration and mediation posts
Possible consequence：The procedure, fees and notices must be checked against the specific business; people's mediation charges no fee. The effect of an award or agreement and responsibility must be checked in accordance with the law against the real facts and procedure, and the outcome cannot be decided directly because the agreement is unclear.
How to reduce risk：Editorially check the procedure, time limits and notice records against the actual jurisdiction, business and institution; people's mediation charges no fee by law and arbitration fees are checked separately under the law, and no uniform confirmation or variation process is set for all procedures.
Evidence：Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China (current) · People's Mediation Law of the People's Republic of China
Typical scenario：Records are overwritten or versions are confused, or the final document does not match the hearing or mediation records.
Roles most affected：Document and record posts
Possible consequence：Editorially check the differences between records and documents and the corrections; a specific setting-aside of an award or a dispute over an agreement must follow the statutory conditions and procedure and is not judged directly from a version difference.
How to reduce risk：Keep the original records and document versions and note the modification traces, and file and retain them as the law and institutional archive requirements require, ensuring that the records match the final documents.
Evidence：Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China (current) · People's Mediation Law of the People's Republic of China
Typical scenario：Sending out or using for unrelated purposes the identity of the parties, trade secrets and personal privacy or case materials.
Roles most affected：Posts involving party and case information
Possible consequence：Check privacy, trade secrets and material permissions in accordance with the law; the specific infringement, dispute and loss of trust are checked against the real facts, and this round obtained no causal magnitude.
How to reduce risk：Editorially check the recipients, use and protective measures for the materials under the law, the engagement and the institution, and redaction cannot replace confidentiality, nor is a blanket prohibition on transfer set for all materials.
Evidence：Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China (current) · People's Mediation Law of the People's Republic of China
Typical scenario：Failing to arrange order and safety when the parties are highly emotional or opposing groups are present, or fatigue from continuous scheduling on long trips.
Roles most affected：Hearing and mediation chairing posts
Possible consequence：Editorially check the specific venue, travel and the safety of an escalated dispute; the U.S. conflict proportion does not prove an accident rate or an individual medical risk.
How to reduce risk：Article 25 of the People's Mediation Law: where a dispute may escalate, targeted preventive measures are taken, and where it may give rise to a public security or criminal case the police and others are reported to promptly; other procedures follow the real authorization, and emotional agitation is not uniformly treated as suspending the authority.
Evidence：O*NET 23-1022.00 occupation summary and task materials · People's Mediation Law of the People's Republic of China
Typical scenario：Letting pressure from one party influence the findings or the conclusion, or failing to disclose a relationship that may affect independence.
Roles most affected：Posts involving setting aside, review and enforcement
Possible consequence：Articles 45—48 of the Arbitration Law govern written disclosure, statutory withdrawal and the deciding body; the specific setting aside of an award and the responsibility follow the statutory facts and procedure, and no outcome is decided directly from a doubt about independence.
How to reduce risk：Check for interest relationships before accepting the case, retain the evidence, the basis and the reasons for the findings to standard, disclose and withdraw in accordance with the law where necessary, and cooperate with the setting aside and review stages by explaining under the procedure.
Evidence：Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China (current) · People's Mediation Law of the People's Republic of China
Typical scenario：Deciding a specialist issue requiring examination without lawfully commissioning an examination, or failing to explain the reasons for accepting the expert opinion.
Roles most affected：Posts involving specialist issues
Possible consequence：Editorially check the specialist facts and the required expert examination; the specific error, effect and responsibility follow the real materials and procedure, and this round obtained no uniform causal magnitude.
How to reduce risk：Where specialist facts exceed one's professional judgement ability, check the need for expert examination and the experts under the applicable rules. In civil and commercial arbitration, experts participate in the hearing at the request of a party or at the tribunal's requirement and after notification, and every expert examination cannot be described as requiring mandatory appearance.
Evidence：Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China (current)
| Entry direction | Early tasks | Checkable ability credentials | Preparation evidence that can be shown without experience | Differences from adjacent roles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Material review and procedural support direction | Under the guidance of the person handling the case, registering case materials, building the evidence index and the procedural timeline, and organising the issues and the items to be confirmed. | Editorial ability checks: records complete and to standard, the index clear and able to find and report gaps in the materials. No employer recognition or hiring validity was obtained. | A fictional case review form containing columns for the parties, authorization, procedural issues and evidence to be supplied. | Differs from a paralegal: this direction serves neutral procedural progress and does not take on representation or asserting the rights of one party. |
| Mediation meeting preparation and chairing support direction | Under a mediator's guidance, preparing the meeting agenda and the key points of the opening statement, checking the parties' wishes and authorization and recording the key points of the meeting. | Editorial ability checks: the agenda complete, able to restate both sides' views accurately, and records neutral and reviewable. No employer recognition or hiring validity was obtained. | A fictional mediation meeting opening statement containing the procedure, the principles of confidentiality and voluntariness, the timetable and the next steps. | Differs from a labour relations specialist: this direction aims to facilitate agreement neutrally and does not represent the organisation's position. |
| Arbitration hearing preparation and documents direction | Assisting with organizing the key points on the admissibility of evidence and the conclusions of precedent research and drafting procedural documents and the structure of the reasons for the findings. | Editorial ability checks: research conclusions accurate, document structure clear and the basis corresponding to the facts. No employer recognition or hiring validity was obtained. | A fictional procedural progress memorandum containing the matters in dispute, the applicable basis, the steps to be taken and the evidence to be supplied. | Differs from a judicial post: this direction is constrained by the parties' choice and the scope of appointment and does not carry judicial adjudicative power. |
| Community and family mediation direction | Assisting with receiving the parties, explaining the mediation process and the principle of confidentiality and organising the facts and claims in family and neighbourhood disputes. | Editorial ability checks: patient communication, facts and claims recorded separately, and able to identify emotional and safety risks. No employer recognition or hiring validity was obtained. | Fictional key points of a mediation plan containing the parties' claims, interests, options and performance arrangements. | Differs from a community worker: this direction centres on facilitating a mediation agreement and keeping procedural records and does not take on social assistance or administrative management. |
| Administrative and public dispute mediation support direction | Assisting with organising the policy and legal basis and the procedural steps, and organising the views of interested parties and filing them. | Editorial ability checks: procedural steps clear, basis citations traceable and views fully recorded. No employer recognition or hiring validity was obtained. | A fictional explanatory document containing the procedural steps, the basis of authority, the views of each party and the handling recommendations. | Differs from an administrative clerical officer: this direction mainly coordinates disputes and explains the basis and does not make administrative decisions. |
United States: BLS usually requires a bachelor's degree and related experience; the O*NET37% professional degree, 16% bachelor's and 11% post-baccalaureate certificate are answers about the education needs of new hires, not the composition of current qualifications, and Job Zone Five is not a Chinese qualification standard. The typical BLS experience of less than 5 years and medium-term OJT are not Chinese uniform thresholds.
Mainland China side: arbitrators are appointed by an arbitration institution from fair and upright persons under the Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China and must meet one of the statutory conditions (holding the legal professional qualification and having worked in arbitration for at least eight years, having practised as a lawyer for at least eight years, having served as a judge or procurator for at least eight years, holding a senior title in legal research or teaching, or having legal knowledge and having engaged in professional work in law, economics and trade, maritime affairs or science and technology with a senior title or an equivalent professional level), and are listed on a panel by specialism; people's mediators are served by members of the people's mediation committee and by persons it appoints and must be adult citizens who are fair and upright, enthusiastic about people's mediation work and have a certain level of education, policy understanding and legal knowledge.
Education and preparation ability must be checked against the specific post; the Chinese People's Mediation Law sets no uniform university education requirement, and the five conditions for civil and commercial arbitrators are not the same as a uniform degree threshold.
Ordinary civil and commercial arbitration in China requires checking institutional appointment and the panel; the special foreign-related arbitration under Article 82 is checked separately against the specific conditions. Arbitration is in principle not public, and where the parties agree to publicity it remains private if state secrets, a third party's trade secrets or personal privacy are involved. People's mediation follows the principle of voluntariness and may be public or private, protecting privacy and trade secrets in accordance with the law.
Vendor A and buyer B signed a contract: 100 items at 1,000 yuan each; the price is written as 100,000 yuan in figures but as "one hundred and ten thousand yuan" in words, which conflicts. Delivery is agreed for June 1, and A says that all 100 items were delivered on June 3, while B says that only 90 are qualified and 10 await inspection. The parties have chosen a lawful civil and commercial arbitration procedure; this exercise reviews the materials only and no actual award is made.
Four items of evidence: E1 delivery note records 100 items on June 3 and bears only A's signature; E2 acceptance sheet records 90 qualified and 10 awaiting inspection, signed by B but undated; E3 the parties' email of June 4 agrees to supplementary testing of the 10 items, and A's June 5 email unilaterally claims that all are qualified; E4 test summary lists only 5 items as qualified, with no full report, sampling method or sample handover.
The party writes to ask about the time limit, the fee and the consequences of refusing mediation. Fictional exercise rules: a communication is arranged within 5 days of receiving complete materials, with no promise of a closing date; the simulated fee is 1% of the amount in dispute, no definite fee is quoted before the amount is verified, and this is not a real institution's fee standard. If both parties agree to the plan on June 10: first confirm the 90 undisputed items, then supplementary testing of the 10 items, with payment after A and B jointly confirm the amount. All names, dates and amounts are fictional.
① Write a procedural memorandum: list the three issues of price, delivery and quality and mark the existing evidence and the items still to be supplied for each; do not find a breach of contract or damages at this stage. ② Prepare the four-row table E1—E4, listing the source, what can be proven, the gaps and the checking action; note whether each can alone support that all 100 items are qualified.
③ Write a neutral reply of no more than 500 characters explaining the simulated time limit and fee without passing yourself off as a real institution; also write the mediation opening and the plan record, distinguishing the proposed plan from the items the parties have confirmed.
Preparation requirements matrix: one row per item (a legal or related professional education, whether the conditions for arbitrators under the Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China are met, whether the conditions for people's mediators under the People's Mediation Law of the People's Republic of China are met, practical experience, legal research and document ability, confidentiality and withdrawal training, and court appearance and travel conditions), listing the checking source and status.
Map each requirement to the rules of the judicial administration departments, arbitration institutions and people's mediation organisations, or to institutional training plans and public institutional information, and note the date consulted.
Record the items not yet met or that you personally need to strengthen (such as practice years, chairing experience, document writing experience and foreign-related or specialist field ability).
Information review: check whether it comes from official channels of the judicial administration departments, arbitration institutions, people's mediation organisations or institutions of learning and whether the date and scope of application are noted.
Material review: check that the exercise materials use only public information and fictional data and contain no real party or case information.
Portfolio review: check that the citations of the basis are complete, that evidence and statements are kept separate, and that the conclusions match the materials and state the uncertainties.
One-page preparation summary: the target direction (labour and commercial arbitration, community and family mediation, administrative and public dispute mediation, environmental and natural resources dispute mediation), the items met and to be strengthened, and the timetable.
| Selection and probation stage | Checkable checkpoints | Observable evidence | Boundaries and warnings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Education and practical training | Whether the legal or related professional education and practical experience required by the post or for handling cases are held. | Able to provide proof of education, grades and practice or work history and to report practical experience honestly. | Falsifying education or practical experience directly affects appointment and the bearing of responsibility. |
| Selection conditions and listing on a panel | Whether the conditions for arbitrators under the Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China are met and the person is listed on a panel by specialism, or the conditions for people's mediators under the People's Mediation Law of the People's Republic of China are met. |
Check the arbitrator appointment conditions, the people's mediator conditions and the practical training path through official channels of the judicial administration departments, arbitration institutions, people's mediation organisations and institutions of learning, and record the items to be confirmed.
Consult the Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China and the People's Mediation Law of the People's Republic of China and compile a checklist of the selection conditions, procedure, confidentiality and withdrawal boundaries.
Using fictional materials, write a procedural progress memorandum for a contract price dispute (the matters in dispute, the applicable basis, the steps to be taken and the evidence to be supplied).
Judge the admissibility and probative value of the four fictional items of evidence and complete the table (source, facts provable, gaps, items to be supplied), explaining the reasons for setting an item aside or strengthening it.
Write an opening statement for a mediation meeting (the procedure, the principles of confidentiality and voluntariness, the timetable and the next steps) and list the points for identifying emotional and safety risks.
| Path or preparation item | Who it applies to | Effect on entering the occupation | Whether it is a universal threshold | Applicable conditions | Input and duration | Limitations and risks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arbitrator appointment (listed on a panel by specialism) | People intending to handle arbitration cases in mainland China | After meeting the statutory conditions and institutional appointment, the specific formation, selection or designation of the tribunal and the authority are checked under the procedure | Statutory conditions (Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China) | Meeting the standards of conduct and one of the five conditions under Articles 21—23 of the current Arbitration Law and being appointed by the institution; the appointment of persons from outside mainland China and specific special foreign-related arbitration are checked separately under Articles 22 and 82. |
Typical scope：Editorial development scenario: under the guidance of the person handling the case, registering case materials, building the evidence index and procedural timeline, and organising the issues and the items to be confirmed. Check against the real training, jurisdiction and institutional authorization; a stage name does not confer full independent chairing, adjudication, supervision or management authority.
Readiness evidence：Able to produce a standards-compliant working paper containing a case material index, an evidential judgement and a procedural timeline (editorial suggestion).
Credential boundary：Chinese civil and commercial arbitration is checked under Articles 21—23 of the current Arbitration Law: professional conduct, one of the five conditions and the specialist panel; labour arbitration follows dedicated law and people's mediation follows its own selection conditions.
Next moves：Editorial suggestion: practise material registration, the evidence index and the procedural timeline item by item under the guidance of the person handling the case, and improve with feedback; this page sets no one-year statutory internship threshold.
Typical scope：Editorial development scenario: independently handling routine contract and property rights dispute cases and taking responsibility for the findings, the basis and the conclusion. Check against the real training, jurisdiction and institutional authorization; a stage name does not confer full independent chairing, adjudication, supervision or management authority.
Readiness evidence：Able to produce the appointment and panel information and independently completed awards or procedural documents and review records (editorial suggestion).
Credential boundary：Meeting the conditions under the Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China and being appointed by an arbitration institution and listed on a panel; the scope and authority of handling are subject to the appointment information and institutional arrangements.
Next moves：Editorial development scenario: completing the procedural progress and document preparation for a routine case independently, accepting review and correcting problems. Check against the real training, jurisdiction and institutional authorization; a stage name does not confer full independent chairing, adjudication, supervision or management authority.
Typical scope：Editorial development scenario: reviewing other people's documents, handling disputes over the basis and conflicts of withdrawal and independence and taking responsibility for technical quality. Check against the real training, jurisdiction and institutional authorization; a stage name does not confer full independent chairing, adjudication, supervision or management authority.
Readiness evidence：Able to produce review records and document standards and supervision materials (editorial suggestion).
Credential boundary：Take on review duties under institutional rules and apply for deeper specialisation and supervision tasks.
Next moves：Develop towards document review and technical responsibility, or move to the corporate dispute management line.
Typical scope：Editorial development scenario: coordinating business and the team and taking responsibility for the institution's case handling quality and compliance. Check against the real training, jurisdiction and institutional authorization; a stage name does not confer full independent chairing, adjudication, supervision or management authority.
Readiness evidence：Able to produce quality system, team development and major case organization records (editorial suggestion).
Credential boundary：Work according to the requirements of the institution and the competent authorities; where foreign-related and specialist field cases are involved, the professional and language ability and the scope of handling must be confirmed.
Next moves：Develop towards institutional business management or professional guidance.
Typical scope：Editorial development scenario: helping to organise labour dispute materials, checking the labour contract, wages, attendance and termination materials and building a factual timeline. Check against the real training, jurisdiction and institutional authorization; a stage name does not confer full independent chairing, adjudication, supervision or management authority.
Readiness evidence：Able to produce case handling records and a statement of the basis (editorial suggestion).
Credential boundary：Enter through the conditions of the labour and personnel dispute handling body and post, and take on the case handling and document duties after meeting the conditions.
Next moves：Editorial suggestion: first complete a fictional labour dispute material index and learn the specialist rules under the guidance of an authorized case handler; this page sets no uniform promotion target of 20 cases.
Typical scope：Editorial development scenario: chairing mediation or a hearing as the case requires, organising the facts and basis of the labour relationship and facilitating an agreement or making an award. Check against the real training, jurisdiction and institutional authorization; a stage name does not confer full independent chairing, adjudication, supervision or management authority.
Readiness evidence：Able to produce the mediation agreement or award document and procedural records (editorial suggestion).
Credential boundary：Work according to the institution's and the system's requirements; where collective disputes are involved, the order, safety and reporting requirements must be observed.
Typical scope：Editorial development scenario: receiving the parties, explaining the mediation process and the principle of confidentiality, organising the facts and claims and facilitating a mediation agreement. Check against the real training, jurisdiction and institutional authorization; a stage name does not confer full independent chairing, adjudication, supervision or management authority.
Readiness evidence：Able to produce mediation registration and work records and a sample mediation agreement (editorial suggestion).
Credential boundary：Enter through the conditions and the election or appointment procedure of a people's mediation organisation and a public legal service body.
Next moves：Editorial suggestion: start with simulated dispute records and guided participation and check the parties' voluntariness, confidentiality and filing; this page sets no uniform threshold of 30 cases.
Typical scope：People's mediation is chaired, recorded, filed and supervised for performance in accordance with the law; Articles 28 and 30 allow written or oral agreements, and whether a written agreement is made is checked against the parties and the statutory conditions.
Readiness evidence：Able to produce the mediation file and the materials for the judicial confirmation application (editorial suggestion).
Credential boundary：Work under the People's Mediation Law and the requirements of the judicial administration departments; no fee is charged and the principle of voluntariness of the parties is followed.
Editorial development scenario: independently handling common civil disputes and guiding the parties to apply for judicial confirmation. Check against the real training, jurisdiction and institutional authorization; a stage name does not confer full independent chairing, adjudication, supervision or management authority.
Editorial development scenario: able, under guidance, to complete case material registration, the evidence index and the procedural timeline to standard, to carry out the procedural requirements accurately and to state gaps in the materials honestly. Check against the real training, jurisdiction and institutional authorization; a stage name does not confer full independent chairing, adjudication, supervision or management authority.
Editorial development scenario: able to complete the procedural progress and document preparation for a routine case independently and produce a reviewable document, and to explain the basis and the reasons for the findings and accept review comments. Check against the real training, jurisdiction and institutional authorization; a stage name does not confer full independent chairing, adjudication, supervision or management authority.
Editorial development scenario: able to chair hearings or mediation in complex or foreign-related cases, handle disputes over the basis and conflicts of withdrawal and independence independently and supervise newcomers. Check against the real training, jurisdiction and institutional authorization; a stage name does not confer full independent chairing, adjudication, supervision or management authority.
Editorial development scenario: able to take on institutional business management and the quality system and external collaboration, or move into corporate dispute management and compliance and specialist research. Check against the real training, jurisdiction and institutional authorization; a stage name does not confer full independent chairing, adjudication, supervision or management authority.
Employment growth rate and annual average job openings
BLS EP shows an exact growth of 4.7% and 300 annual openings; the OOH shows 5% rounded, and openings include replacement and growth and are not the net increase.
Does not establish：An independent occupational basis; the U.S. projection is not a guarantee for an individual or a Chinese projection; the current O*NET growth band of 5—6% is kept separately and not mixed in as the exact EP value.
United States (wages and employment) · exact (independent basis for this occupation)
75,530 US dollars a year; about 10,500 people in 2025
U.S. median wage and employment size for this occupation
Employment in 2025 of about 10500; the May2025 median is 75530 US dollars / 36.31 an hour. Employment includes the self-employed and the wages exclude them, so they are not the same survey sample.
Does not establish：Wages and employment are different survey bases. BLS has published the May 2025 occupational wage medians for four industries, given in the U.S. wage table; they do not support per-institution or individual wages and cannot be extrapolated to China.
Mainland China · contextual (basis note)
Occupational wages not listed separately; arbitrators and people's mediators must meet the statutory selection conditions
Occupational wage availability and selection conditions
Chinese arbitration and people's mediation conditions are checked separately; this NBS table does not list occupational wages, and this round obtained no national employment projection or demand share for the occupation, so growth is not inferred from the law or from dispute handling demand.
Does not establish：Insufficient evidence: this round obtained no exact Chinese occupational wage distribution or national employment projection. The NBS industry and job category figures serve as a broad reference only and do not represent this occupation's wages or demand, and statutory selection cannot prove employment growth.
These are capability relationships, not automatic promotions or credential waivers.
Transfers：Editorial transferability check: evidence review, application of the law, chairing hearings and document writing can serve as check leads for the target task. No direct transfer validity was obtained; the method, training, qualifications, assessment and authority are checked separately, and hiring is not guaranteed.
Build next：Requires additional ability in judicial procedure, adjudication rules and judgment writing.
View career profileTransfers：Editorial transferability check: chairing the procedure, establishing the facts and applying the basis can serve as check leads for the target task and apply to administrative disputes. No direct transfer validity was obtained; the method, training, qualifications, assessment and authority are checked separately, and hiring is not guaranteed.
Build next：Requires additional ability in administrative procedure, administrative law standards and administrative adjudication writing.
View career profileTransfers：Editorial transferability check: legal research, document writing and evidence analysis can serve as check leads for the target task. No direct transfer validity was obtained; the method, training, qualifications, assessment and authority are checked separately, and hiring is not guaranteed.
Build next：Requires additional ability in representation, legal opinions, negotiation and litigation technique.
View career profileTransfers：Editorial transferability check: material organization, legal research and record keeping can serve as check leads for the target task and apply to legal support. No direct transfer validity was obtained; the method, training, qualifications, assessment and authority are checked separately, and hiring is not guaranteed.
Build next：Requires additional ability in case file management, research support, document layout and compliant document standards.
View career profileTransfers：Editorial transferability check: labour dispute handling and communication and negotiation can serve as check leads for the target task. No direct transfer validity was obtained; the method, training, qualifications, assessment and authority are checked separately, and hiring is not guaranteed.
Build next：Requires additional ability in collective bargaining, labour contracts, employee relations and dispute prevention.
View career profileTransfers：Editorial transferability check: organising rules, researching the basis and written explanation can serve as check leads for the target task. No direct transfer validity was obtained; the method, training, qualifications, assessment and authority are checked separately, and hiring is not guaranteed.
Build next：Requires additional ability in regulatory rules, internal review and follow-up on rectification.
View career profileTransfers：Editorial transferability check: factual investigation, communication and procedural records can serve as check leads for the target task. No direct transfer validity was obtained; the method, training, qualifications, assessment and authority are checked separately, and hiring is not guaranteed.
Build next：Requires additional ability in anti-discrimination and equal opportunity law, investigation and mediation.
View career profileTransfers：Editorial transferability check: communication, dispute prevention and process records can serve as check leads for the target task. No direct transfer validity was obtained; the method, training, qualifications, assessment and authority are checked separately, and hiring is not guaranteed.
Build next：Requires additional ability in recruitment, performance, labour relations and personnel systems.
View career profileArbitrators and mediators chair the procedure, review the materials and apply the basis and make an award or facilitate an agreement within the scope of the engagement or appointment; the hearing and adjudication of litigation cases are conducted by the people's court in accordance with the law; representation and legal opinions are provided by lawyers; administrative decisions are made by administrative organs in accordance with the law; labour and personnel disputes are handled by the labour and personnel dispute arbitration committee under dedicated rules; in-house employee relations and collective bargaining are handled by the labour relations specialist on behalf of the organisation; and compliance review and the implementation of regulatory requirements are the responsibility of the compliance officer. An arbitral award and a mediation agreement are lawful dispute resolution outcomes; they do not replace a court judgment, representation or an administrative decision.
Look at observable behaviour: whether one can invest over the long term in case file reading, legal research and document writing (65% consider precision or accuracy extremely important and 35% very important), whether one can stay neutral and patient in conflict situations and multi-party communication (45% face conflict situations every day and 25% need to deal with unpleasant or angry people at least once a week), whether one can adapt to long hours of sitting and irregular schedules (80% sit continually or almost continually, 47% work more than a 40-hour week and 63% have an irregular schedule), and whether one can accept the relatively serious error consequence requirements (20% extremely serious and 30% serious). The interest code ECS (Enterprising, Conventional, Social) is a checkable starting point, but suitability is decided by legal or related professional training, practical experience and the selection conditions. This page does not constitute appointment, an examination opinion or a health diagnosis.
This page obtained no occupation-level research on AI adoption or substitution rates. Legal research, summaries, deadline reminders and document drafts are trial assistance scenarios; tool output must be checked and cannot be used to predict the disappearance of the job.
Judging the admissibility and probative value of evidence, establishing the facts and organising the issues, choosing and explaining the applicable law, chairing and communicating in hearings or mediation, confirming the parties' genuine wishes and voluntariness, judging independence and conflicts of interest, and signing the award or agreement documents and keeping procedural records. These steps are judged by the arbitrator or mediator personally and recorded honestly, and tool output cannot replace them.
Insufficient evidence: no exact national occupational wage distribution or comparable full-time and part-time pay sample for China was obtained. The NBS 2025 category means are 110,162 yuan for business services, 182,064 yuan for professional and technical services, 133,539 yuan for education and 119,465 yuan for public administration and similar, all non-private annual average wages and not an occupational median. Whether part-time work is included must be checked against the payment relationship of the surveyed unit and cannot be excluded wholesale.
The BLS May 2025 wage percentiles shown on the O*NET 23-1022.00 page are: an annual median of 75,530 US dollars (hourly 36.31 US dollars), a 10th percentile of 47,220 US dollars, a 25th percentile of 57,360 US dollars, a 75th percentile of 108,000 US dollars and a 90th percentile of 155,440 US dollars; the median annual wage is consistent with the 2025 data in the BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook. The median is the midpoint of the distribution rather than a starting salary; employment and the projection use another data period, 2025—2035 (about 10,500 posts, growth of 5% and a net increase of about 500), which this page labels separately and which cannot be extrapolated to mainland China.
Chinese civil and commercial arbitration is checked under Articles 21—23 of the current Arbitration Law for conduct, one of the five conditions and the panel; people's mediation is checked under Articles 13—14 for selection; labour arbitration follows dedicated law. There is no uniform national licence in the United States, but some states and courts require certification, training or a professional licence for specific cases. The O*NET37% professional degree figure is a survey answer, not a statutory threshold.
On the U.S. side, the BLS projection shown on the O*NET 23-1022.00 page is average growth of 3% to 4% over 2024—2034 with an annual average of about 300 openings and about 9,100 employed in 2024; the BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook separately gives growth of 5% over 2025—2035, a net increase of about 500 and an annual average of about 300 openings, and the two have different data periods, which this page labels separately. On the mainland China side, arbitrators and people's mediators are subject to statutory selection conditions and procedural management, and the number of cases is related to economic activity and the volume of contractual and labour relations disputes, but there is no published national employment projection. Moves are possible into judicial and court work, administrative adjudication, law and representation, paralegal and legal support, labour relations and collective bargaining, compliance and regulation, equal opportunity and anti-discrimination, and human resources management, but each direction has a different qualification and responsibility system; this page provides no individual employment prediction.
An arbitral award and a mediation agreement must be distinguished: mediation helps the parties negotiate voluntarily. Ordinary civil and commercial arbitrators in China are lawfully appointed and listed on a panel, and special foreign-related arbitration is checked separately under Article 82; people's mediators are selected in accordance with the law, so no one can perform statutory duties merely by calling themselves a mediator. A people's mediation agreement is legally binding, and judicial confirmation follows a separate procedure; tool drafts and individual outcomes must be verified and cannot be taken directly as general rules.
FermatMind career content editorial team
In this window, on 2026-10-09, the occupational materials and legal sources above were checked; the NBS was reused in a limited way from October 8. The Ministry of Education web page for the Arbitration Law failed to read in the browser, while the terminal successfully retrieved the statutory text of 81768 bytes, and a Ministry of Justice reposting was also checked; the SVAMC PDF was actually read for its applicable premises and guidelines 1—7, without verifying every comment paragraph.
This round actually read the O*NET23-1022 current detail, wages and HotTech, the BLS EP and OOH, the 2025 revised Arbitration Law and the People's Mediation Law; the NBS broad statistics read are reused in a limited way. The SVAMC2024 guidelines are industry background only, and aliases used for the same source do not amount to several studies.
Limitations：Used for occupational identity, the tasks (20), work activities, the interest code (ECS) and common job titles. This update shows current 2025 employment of 10500, a 25—35 growth band of 5—6% and 300 annual openings; in 2025 professional and technical 43% / government 29%. The band and the EP4.7% / OOH5% are checked separately, and no reason or Chinese inference is drawn.
Limitations：U.S. 2025 employment, May2025 wages and the 25—35 rounded growth of 5% / 300 annual openings; the exact EP figure of 4.7% is listed separately. U.S. licensing and training rules are not extrapolated to China.
Limitations：Occupation 23-1022 employment from 10.5 thousand in 2025 to 11.0 thousand in 2035, net 0.5 thousand, 4.7%, 9.5% self-employed and 0.3 thousand annual openings, with the classification of bachelor's degree / less than 5 years related experience / medium-term OJT; not Chinese entry conditions or AI causality.
Limitations：Used for the annual 10/25/50/75/90 percentile values and the data period (including the hourly median).
Limitations：Published by industry category, unit type and job category and does not contain separate wages for this occupation; it serves as a broad reference only.
Limitations：Chinese civil and commercial arbitration: the five conditions and the panel under Articles 21—23, disclosure and withdrawal under Articles 45—48, the exceptions to publicity under Article 52 and the boundaries of specialist arbitration under Article 93; people's mediation is cited separately under cnmed.
Limitations：U.S. Work Context respondent proportions, where Very important means very important; they do not support Chinese law, accident rates or an occupational health diagnosis.
Limitations：Used for the work activity weights (getting information 91, resolving conflicts and negotiating with others 91, making decisions and solving problems 90, analysing data or information 85 and so on).
Limitations：Used for U.S. tasks, work activities and context; it cannot support Chinese law, industry wages or an AI adoption rate.
Limitations：Used for workweek length, schedule regularity, the proportion of sitting and the proportion of indoor work.
Limitations：Articles 3—4 on the wage bill and its six components and Article 11 on the exclusions; the pre-tax basis before individual deductions is supported separately by the NBS annual wage notes on this page.
Limitations：This update shows 43% professional, scientific and technical services and 29% government in 2025, which are classified differently from the OOH legal services / local / state / other professional services figures; no Chinese occupational distribution or wage causality is inferred.
Limitations：There is no uniform national licence in the United States; some states and courts require certification, training or a professional licence, which cannot be extrapolated to China.
Limitations：Used for a combined view of occupational tasks and job characteristics.
Limitations：Used for the description of procedural record, document and archive requirements.
Limitations：Used for checking the task list.
Limitations：Used for the description of record and data requirements and practice responsibility.
Limitations：Used for the description of related occupations (judges and magistrates, administrative law judges, lawyers, paralegals, labour relations specialists, compliance officers and so on).
Limitations：Used for checking the task description.
Limitations：Used for checking the occupational attributes.
Limitations：Used for checking the data notes.
Limitations：Used for the Job Zone Five (SVP 8.0 and above) and the preparation period description.
Limitations：37% professional degree, 16% bachelor's and 11% post-baccalaureate certificate are answers about the needs of new hires, not the education composition of current practitioners.
Limitations：May 2025 U.S. national wage quintiles; industry medians are provided separately by the BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook.
Limitations：Used for the description of work intensity and work context and responsibility.
Limitations：Article 4 on no fee, Articles 13—14 on selection and Articles 27—33 on records, the effect of the agreement and judicial confirmation; not a civil and commercial arbitration qualification.
Limitations：Proportion of advertisements mentioning software; not AI adoption, employment causality research or a Chinese qualification.
Limitations：Fictional exercises, pieces and path suggestions; not measured recruitment statistics, a regulatory threshold or legal advice.
Limitations：Industry advice applicable within the scope of the parties' agreement and/or adoption by the tribunal or institution and not reducing mandatory rules; it covers tool limitations, confidentiality, case-by-case AI disclosure, verification of output and evidence, not delegating personal adjudication duties and due process. It is not a Chinese mandatory rule, a whole-occupation adoption rate or comparative, wage or employment causality research, and not all comments and later versions were verified.
Insufficient evidence: Chinese occupational and city wages, part-time or per-case income, complete recruitment and the national projection, the occupational AI adoption rate, cross-task comparison effects, wage and employment causality and a disappearance year, the 2022 occupational and institutional industry sub-categories, the state-by-state U.S. and complete adjacent entry rules, personality predictive validity and medical accident causality are still missing. The current O*NET 2025 / 25—35 material and the growth band of 5—6%, EP4.7% and OOH5% are checked separately, and no reason for the difference is invented. SVAMC2024 is an industry guideline after adoption and does not stand for Chinese statutory authorization, and all comments and later versions were not verified. Old-period historical values in the fact register that have no currently visible consumer are retained within scope; the frozen exercise pieces are not claimed to have been revised.
Big Five (English) · MBTI (English) · Enneagram (Chinese) · IQ (Chinese)
Look at the work direction and the nature of the institution, not the job title.
The selection conditions and the institution's business scope determine whether cases can be handled and in what capacity one takes part in the procedure.
The working pattern, intensity and record-keeping requirements directly affect whether the work can be completed compliantly and sustainably.
The nature of the institution and fluctuations in case intake affect long-term sustainability.
Deeper specialisation, being listed on a panel and handling complex cases determine long-term development and the occupational ceiling.
First check the official and institutional requirements, then decide on the investment.
Articles 45—48 of ordinary civil and commercial arbitration govern written disclosure, statutory withdrawal and the decision of the competent body; people's mediation is checked for its neutrality and confidentiality duties, and the arbitration withdrawal procedure is not applied uniformly. Material permissions are checked under the law and with the actual institution.
Insufficient evidence: no complete recruitment sample supporting a uniform criminal record certificate or training period requirement for this occupation was obtained. The actual appointment, confidentiality and withdrawal requirements must still be checked.
The O*NET 23-1022.00 interest code is ECS (Enterprising, Conventional, Social); the main work activities are getting information (91) and resolving conflicts and negotiating with others (91), followed by making decisions and solving problems (90), analysing data or information (85) and evaluating information to determine compliance with standards (84).
The work context is characterised by high precision and relatively serious consequences when an error is hard to correct (65% consider precision or accuracy extremely important and 35% very important; 20% consider the consequences very serious when an error is hard to correct and 30% fairly serious), the frequency of time pressure (30% every day, 30% at least once a week but not every day), long hours of sitting and irregular schedules (80% sit continually or almost continually, 47% more than 40 hours, 63% irregular) and frequent conflict situations (45% face conflict situations every day and 25% need to deal with unpleasant or angry people at least once a week but not every day); 50% consider competition highly fierce and 20% moderately competitive. These are not shares of working time or risk incidence rates.
In the U.S. survey 85% have a great deal of decision freedom; 21% consider communication with external customers or the public very important and 16% important. This is a survey distribution and does not prove that every post has high external contact demands.
Editorial tool checks: check the case management, legal research, document and spreadsheet and online meeting systems against the real institution, and which materials and stages they are used for; the tool list this round cannot prove the actual degree of adoption across the occupation.
Some directions use electronic case files and evidence organisation tools; whether dedicated systems and databases are provided must be checked with the institution.
Tools cannot replace judgement: the admissibility of evidence, the finding of facts, the choice of the applicable law and chairing and the conclusion remain the responsibility of the arbitrator or mediator and are recorded honestly.
Memorandum: the amounts 100,000 and 110,000 conflict, so the original contract, the payment and both parties' confirmation must be checked; the fact that June 3 is two days later than June 1 is only a date comparison and cannot establish liability, exemption or loss without supplementary evidence. List the 90 items and the 10 items separately and do not write all qualified as confirmed.
Evidence table: E1 supports only A's claim of delivery, so B's receipt or transport records must be supplied; E2 supports B's statement about quantity and quality, so the date and the record of how it was made must be supplied; E3 supports the June 4 agreement to supplementary testing, and A's unilateral June 5 email does not prove that all are qualified; E4 is only a test summary of 5 items, so the full report, method, samples and handover must be supplied. All four require hearing the other side, and the existing materials cannot alone prove that all 100 items are qualified.
Example reply: we will check the price, the delivery and the supplementary testing materials. Under the rules of this exercise, a communication is arranged within 5 days of complete materials, and the timing of service and supplementary evidence affects progress, so no closing date can be promised. The simulated rate is 1% of the amount in dispute; if it is verified as 100,000 yuan that is 1,000 yuan and if 110,000 yuan then 1,100 yuan, and no definite quotation is given for now. Mediation presupposes the voluntariness of both parties, and refusing mediation is not the same as refusing arbitration; where arbitration has begun it continues under the applicable procedure. Please supply the original contract, the date of receipt and the complete test report.
Opening and plan check: explain neutrality, voluntariness and confidentiality; each side states its case and then restates the issues. The June 10 plan is only a conditional arrangement, and the supplementary testing of 10 items and the confirmation of the amount and the payment date still await clarification by the parties; where confirmation is incomplete, do not write all settled. If mediation is refused or fails, record the status and continue under the original procedure, without compelling a signature.
All of this is an editorial simulation and does not replace legal training, arbitrator appointment or real institutional advice; no real case files, party information or internal templates are used. The reference answers are an approach to review, not a decision in the case.
Attach the list of public materials and the source links, noting the date consulted.
The preparation record should show an understanding of procedural standards, the rules of evidence and record-keeping requirements, not institutional internal documents or another person's documents.
Do not write internet rumours or unofficial information into the preparation record; for content on legislation and judicial interpretations, note the name and the date of entry into force.
| Able to produce the appointment or selection information and explain the personal scope of handling and the boundaries of authority. |
| Being appointed without meeting the statutory conditions or handling cases beyond scope is a violation. |
| Material review and document ability | Whether material review, evidential judgement and document drafting can be completed to standard and errors corrected under review. | The material index is to standard, evidence and statements are kept separate, and the document structure and basis correspond. | Forging procedural records, evidence or the basis makes the document untrue and may be unlawful. |
|---|
| Neutrality and compliance | Whether the procedural, confidentiality, withdrawal and independence requirements are understood. | Able to explain the scope of the engagement and personal boundaries and to disclose and withdraw in accordance with the law where an interest relationship exists. | Failing to disclose and withdraw in accordance with the regulations, or disclosing party and case information, may be unlawful or a violation. |
|---|
Write up one mediation outcome as a 500-character explanation for the parties (including the reasons for settlement or failure, the key points of any agreement and the further options and remedies).
Review the week's preparation: whether you are willing to do case file reading, document writing and multi-party communication over the long term, which direction you prefer, which training or conditions are still missing, and list the next checking checklist.
| According to the practice years and the examination and appointment cycle |
| The specific violation, removal from the panel and responsibility must be checked against the real facts in accordance with the law |
| People's mediator selection | People intending to work in people's mediation | Determines whether one may chair mediation as a people's mediator | Statutory conditions (People's Mediation Law of the People's Republic of China) | Served by members of the people's mediation committee and by persons it appoints, and must be adult citizens who are fair and upright, enthusiastic about people's mediation work and have a certain level of education, policy understanding and legal knowledge | According to the election or appointment and training cycle | Mediation must follow the principles of voluntariness and confidentiality, and compulsory mediation is not permitted |
|---|
| Legal or related professional education | All intending entrants | Helps build the legal and professional foundation; a degree alone does not confer the authority to handle cases | Checked against the specific post; not a uniform university education threshold | According to institutional training plans and the conditions of institutions and competent authorities | Duration of college diploma or bachelor's and higher programs | An education level is not the same as practical ability, which still requires practical training and document and record keeping |
|---|
| Practical experience and chairing training | All intending entrants | Editorially check the real training and records, which do not directly prove the ability to handle cases independently | The institution's actual requirements | According to the institution's or organisation's arrangements, under the guidance of persons who meet the conditions | According to the institution and the accumulated cases | Actual handling is checked against the statutory conditions, appointment or selection and the institution, and training alone does not determine competence |
|---|
| Legal research and document tool ability | All directions | Editorially check the tools and material review; this round obtained no comparison of effects on efficiency or document quality | Checked against the actual institutional systems and duties, with no uniform requirement set for the whole occupation | According to the institution's case management system and databases and document standards | According to the training and project practice | Tool ability is not the same as the judgement of the applicable law and responsibility |
|---|
| Confidentiality and withdrawal training | All directions (more necessary where foreign-related and commercial cases are involved) | Check confidentiality and disclosure and withdrawal in accordance with the law, and training does not directly determine the admissibility of a document or the avoidance of risk | The requirements of the law and institutional standards | According to the confidentiality system and the withdrawal and independence requirements | According to the training and review cycle | Failing to disclose and withdraw in accordance with the regulations may be unlawful or a violation |
|---|
The People's Mediation Law of the People's Republic of China (adopted 2010-08-28, Presidential Order No. Thirty-Four, in force from 2011-01-01) provides that people's mediation committees are mass organizations established in accordance with the law to mediate civil disputes, and mediation charges no fee; people's mediators are served by members of the people's mediation committee and by persons appointed by it, and must be adult citizens who are fair and upright, enthusiastic about people's mediation work and have a certain level of education, policy understanding and legal knowledge; the judicial administration department of the State Council and the judicial administration departments of local people's governments at or above county level are responsible for guidance, and primary people's courts provide professional guidance; a mediation agreement reached through mediation is legally binding, and the parties may jointly apply to a people's court for judicial confirmation within thirty days from the date the agreement takes effect. This page did not verify a uniform Chinese occupational classification mapping for arbitration and mediation posts; it provides no unverified sub-category code and no institution's specific appointment conditions or pass rates. Articles 28 and 30 of the People's Mediation Law allow written or oral agreements, so a written agreement is not required in every case.
Where party and case materials involve identity, trade secrets or personal privacy, the confidentiality and personal information protection requirements must be observed; where an interest relationship exists or a circumstance that may affect independence arises, it must be disclosed and withdrawal made in accordance with the law.
U.S. O*NET lists Job Zone Five, SVP8.0 and above; 37% professional degree, 16% bachelor's and 11% post-baccalaureate certificate are answers about the education needs of new hires, not the education composition of practitioners. BLS notes that there is no uniform national licence, but some states or courts require certification, training hours or a professional licence such as that of a lawyer; the specific local rules are checked separately.
Those intending to enter should check the rules of the competent authorities and institutions and institutional training plans and take part in practical training and the appointment procedure through official or compliant channels; this page does not constitute legal, examination or appointment advice.
Next moves：Editorial development scenario: independently completing the mediation or arbitration hearing of a labour dispute case and forming a reviewable conclusion. Check against the real training, jurisdiction and institutional authorization; a stage name does not confer full independent chairing, adjudication, supervision or management authority.
Typical scope：Editorial development scenario: reviewing conclusions and documents, unifying case handling methods and taking responsibility for quality. Check against the real training, jurisdiction and institutional authorization; a stage name does not confer full independent chairing, adjudication, supervision or management authority.
Readiness evidence：Able to produce review records and basis standards and training materials (editorial suggestion).
Credential boundary：Work according to the institution's and the system's requirements; where collective incidents and public opinion are involved, reporting and response must follow the rules.
Next moves：Develop towards review and technical responsibility or team management.
Typical scope：Editorial development scenario: managing institutional business and personnel and taking responsibility for handling quality and compliance. Check against the real training, jurisdiction and institutional authorization; a stage name does not confer full independent chairing, adjudication, supervision or management authority.
Readiness evidence：Able to produce system, personnel development and cross-institution collaboration records (editorial suggestion).
Credential boundary：Work according to the institution's requirements; where institutional management and external collaboration are involved, the appointment conditions must be met.
Next moves：Develop towards heading the institution or research and system development.
Typical scope：Editorial development scenario: checking whether mediation files are to standard, guiding the handling of difficult disputes and reporting under the rules. Check against the real training, jurisdiction and institutional authorization; a stage name does not confer full independent chairing, adjudication, supervision or management authority.
Readiness evidence：Able to produce record checking, training and joint mediation collaboration materials (editorial suggestion).
Credential boundary：Take on record checking and guidance duties under the organisation's rules and apply for professional deepening and training tasks.
Next moves：Develop towards being responsible for the mediation organisation or cross-field joint mediation.
Typical scope：Editorial development scenario: coordinating regional mediation work and team building and taking responsibility for quality and compliance. Check against the real training, jurisdiction and institutional authorization; a stage name does not confer full independent chairing, adjudication, supervision or management authority.
Readiness evidence：Able to produce system, team development and cross-departmental collaboration records (editorial suggestion).
Credential boundary：Work under the rules; where organisational management and cross-departmental collaboration are involved, the requirements must be met.
Next moves：Develop towards regional mediation management and system development.
Limitations：Editorial ratings use the existing occupational responsibilities and AI task analysis on this page. They are not adoption rates, measured effects, job-disappearance or personal-unemployment probabilities, or official scores from Stanford or another external institution. No measured time weights or future robot deployment are assumed.
