Loading page content
Original attachment reflection · Full results free
Take 24 original situation ratings to explore relationship worry and distance from closeness. See two means and all four full attachment-style guides, free without signup or a fixed label.
24 questions · about 6 minutes · no signup
Choose one adult close relationship you are willing to reflect on, and consider typical situations in that same relationship over the past three months. Rate frequency from 1, never, to 5, almost always. Use the unscored option when no experience applies, you are unsure or you prefer not to answer. No name or private text is needed; do not answer for the other person.
Preparing the test…
All questions and full results are free, with no signup. Saving is optional; only saved attempts can be resumed after a refresh or language change. Tab drafts expire after 24 hours and clear on completion or retake.
What is my attachment style? A useful starting point is to separate worry about a connection from distance from closeness and reliance. Secure, anxious, avoidant and fearful-avoidant prototypes describe combinations of those two experiences. This original edition shows two continuous means and all four full guides, with everyday examples and comparisons rather than a fixed box for you or a partner.
Use one adult close relationship you want to reflect on and frequencies over the past three months. Do not answer for someone else or merge different relationships into a fixed judgment about everyone. No applicable experience, uncertainty or a wish not to answer can be unscored. No other person’s name or private text is required.
Each axis has 12 items: eight use the selected 1–5 value and four use six minus the response. After all 24 selections, an axis with at least eight ratings uses keyed sum divided by rated count, rounded to one decimal. Otherwise it shows insufficient information. Unscored items are neither zero nor midpoints. The eight-rating minimum is a website information-completeness rule, not a research or clinical cutoff.
There are no high/low category cutoffs, norms, percentiles or combined security total. All four adult prototypes appear in full: security describes less of both experiences, anxious emphasises worry, avoidant emphasises distance and fearful-avoidant combines more of both. They explain concepts without certifying a personal type. Insufficient information or middle-range responses need no forced label.
These four adult prototype guides compare combinations of relationship worry and distance from closeness without personal attempts. After all 24 selections, read two means and rated counts separately, without fixed type cutoffs. Insufficient information remains explicit.
Explore security in an adult two-dimensional framework, without treating this questionnaire as certification or proof that a relationship has no problems.
Understand the anxious prototype as more relationship worry with less distance from closeness, without treating a mean as evidence of an anxiety disorder, childhood history or a partner’s feelings.
Explore the avoidant prototype as more distance from closeness with less relationship worry, without equating solitude, clear boundaries or one mean with an avoidant identity.
Compare the conceptual combination of more relationship worry and more distance from closeness, without inferring trauma, a disorganised-attachment diagnosis, compatibility or relationship quality.
This edition uses 24 original situation-frequency items to explore worry and distance from closeness. A complete attempt shows two means or insufficient-information states and all four adult prototypes in full. It starts reflection rather than certifying a fixed type or classifying a partner.
In an adult two-dimensional framework, security describes less worry and distance, anxious emphasises worry, avoidant emphasises distance and fearful-avoidant combines more of both. They are not four separate abilities or percentages adding to one hundred, and the quiz establishes no natural category border.
No. FermatMind independently authored these items, keying and explanations. This is neither the ECR, ECR-R, ECR-S, ECR-RS nor an authorised translation, with no established website validity or norms. Sources explain theory and method limits, not validation of these items.
Dimensions are continuous, and cutting scores into one type discards information. This edition has no validated category cutoff, so it retains two means, rated counts and four complete conceptual guides. A response-scale midpoint of three is neither a population average, health boundary nor compatibility rule.
No. This reflection investigates no past, observes no interaction, conducts no clinical interview and assesses no relationship safety. It is not an infant disorganised classification or diagnosis of anxiety or another condition, and predicts neither compatibility, relationship outcomes nor work performance.
All 24 items, two summaries and four full guides are free without signup. Optional drafts last 24 hours in this tab and clear on completion, retake or clearing. Sharing contains names and the public entry only, without answers, means, another person’s name or internal IDs. Blocked storage or copying still permits an attempt.
These independently authored items and explanations do not administer ECR-family instruments or borrow their validity, norms, permission or score interpretations. Sources discuss adult attachment dimensions and category limits. This quiz cannot establish infant classifications, childhood, trauma, clinical conditions, a partner’s actual wishes, relationship safety or job suitability.
These sources provide background, not validation of this questionnaire or an individual diagnosis.
Website content edition 1.0.0 ·
Source question / scoring / report versions: 1.0.0 / 1.0.0 / 1.0.0