Loading page content
24 original breakup-reflection items · Four full guides free
Review one ended relationship through 24 original statements. Read four full guides on communication, needs, boundaries and life changes, with optional skips.
24 questions · about 6 minutes · no signup
Think only about one intimate relationship that has ended. Choose how well each statement fits what you remember before it ended. The numeric midpoint means uncertain or depends on the situation; choose unscored if you cannot or prefer not to answer. Keep the other person’s identity private.
Preparing the test…
All questions and full results are free, with no signup. Saving is optional; only saved attempts can be resumed after a refresh or language change. Tab drafts expire after 24 hours and clear on completion or retake.
Use four separate groups to revisit communication, differing needs, boundaries and outside pressures. The result offers complete explanations and optional reflection prompts for your own records. About six minutes is an editorial estimate; there is no timer.
The 24 Chinese statements, their four six-item groups and the five numeric anchors come from FermatMind’s original miniature-program product for reviewing a breakup. English is a new working translation. The explanatory guides add original examples while retaining the source’s four separate themes.
This original preview is for entertainment and self-exploration. Reliability, validity, norms and percentiles have not been established.
The test has not completed psychometric validation and is not a diagnostic, assessment or legal basis. Having a set of items is not itself evidence of validity.
First, four points: this is one person’s retrospective view of one relationship that has ended; the four scores are read separately and do not identify a main cause; the result cannot allocate responsibility or decide reconciliation or partner compatibility; violence, coercion, control and safety threats are not ordinary mutual incompatibility, and safety comes first.
This reflects your memory and understanding. The other person may remember or feel differently, and some facts may remain unconfirmed. It is reasonable to keep that uncertainty.
Feelings after an ending, new information and time can influence memory. Recalling a situation differently on another occasion is not unusual.
The result contains four separate groups. Each adds the six numeric responses and calculates a mean from 1 to 5. There is no total score.
The raw sum adds six item scores and ranges from 6 to 30. It describes only the current responses and is not a grade.
The mean divides the sum by six, ranging from 1 to 5. It represents how well the six statements fit overall, rather than frequency or probability.
The original numeric midpoint 3 means uncertain or depends on the situation. It remains a valid score of 3. Each complete six-item group has a sum of 6–30; divide by six and round to four decimal places. For example, a sum of 20 gives 3.3333. The extra decimal places show arithmetic, not measurement precision.
Read the four groups separately, like parallel notes. They are not combined, offset against one another or compared for strength.
The four scores cannot be ranked against each other. Different numbers do not establish that one group was more important, and no main cause is assigned.
There are no high, medium or low thresholds. The test does not label the situation severe, ordinary or mild, so do not use its numbers to assign a level.
The website adds an explicit unscored option that is different from the source’s numeric midpoint. Choose an answer or this option for all 24 statements to finish. A skipped statement withholds that group’s sum and mean; a different complete group remains readable. An all-unscored attempt finishes with no personal numbers and all four full guides available.
This is a stated web adaptation: the original miniature-program scorer suppresses personal interpretation when its full 24-item numeric attempt is incomplete. The website’s separate complete-group display and skipped-item completion are not a new validation of the source. An unanswered blank also remains different from an explicit skip.
The scores describe your retrospective impression and cannot prove that an event caused the relationship to end.
The result does not allocate responsibility, judge who was right or wrong, or require you to reflect on what you caused.
The result does not decide who suits you, select a partner or predict a future relationship.
The result does not advise reconciliation or require contact, confrontation, explanation or attempts to win someone back. Any decision about contact remains yours, informed by practical safety.
Violence, coercion, stalking, threats, force and control are not poor communication or mutual incompatibility. This test cannot manage safety risk or allocate responsibility. If there is a practical safety threat, prioritise safety: you may pause contact and seek help from a trusted person, local emergency services or appropriate professional support. Do not seek two-sided causes for harmful acts or treat staying or reconciling as consent.
The website keeps answers and results on this page. If you explicitly choose to save progress, individual choices are stored in this browser tab’s session storage for up to 24 hours, including a refresh or language change. Completion, retaking, exit-and-clear or expiry clears that draft. No final-result cache is saved. Without opting in, a refresh loses progress.
The original miniature-program version used a device draft and a final-result cache. That historical storage description is not the website’s promise. Website public guide links contain no answers, group scores or partner identity, and the copy action includes only the public title and entry link.
If you answer again later, use the experiences you can confirm at that time. Different results may reflect changes in memory, context or understanding, and do not automatically mean that the truth about the relationship has changed.
Four full guides review communication, needs and expectations, boundaries and trust, and external pressures around one relationship that ended. Each group needs all six numeric answers for its separate mean. The numeric midpoint 3 means uncertain; unscored choices are not zero. All guides remain open without a main-cause verdict, blame, compatibility or reconciliation decision. Public pages contain no personal answers, values or private relationship record.
These six statements ask whether important topics became harder to discuss fully, with less clarification and checking.
These six statements concern whether expectations about contact, support, space, responsibilities and future arrangements remained difficult to coordinate.
These six statements concern whether expressed words and agreements were consistently remembered and whether a refusal was respected.
These six statements ask whether conditions outside the relationship, such as work, study, finances, distance, family and caregiving, changed how you spent time together.
The four groups organise one person’s recollection. They do not identify a main cause, assign responsibility or estimate which factor caused a share of the breakup. Specific facts and other perspectives remain outside the score.
The source’s value 3 means uncertain or depends on the situation. It is a valid numeric response, not a diagnosis or moderate severity. The additional unscored choice is separate and receives no numeric value.
Each group contains six forward-scored statements from 1 to 5. Add all six for a raw sum of 6–30, divide by six and round to four decimal places. Groups are not combined, ranked or classified by thresholds.
You can choose the website’s unscored option for any statement. That group has no personal sum or mean, while other complete groups remain available. All-unscored attempts can finish and read all four full guides.
Contact, confrontation and reconciliation are not required. You can reflect privately or stop. Violence, coercion, control and safety threats are not treated as ordinary mutual incompatibility; practical safety comes first.
This is FermatMind’s original preview with a new English working translation. Reliability, validity, norms and cutoffs have not been established. It does not diagnose, decide legal responsibility or predict compatibility.
Answers stay in the page. Saving progress is an explicit opt-in to a 24-hour draft in this browser tab; completion, retaking or exit-and-clear removes it. Public links and copied text contain no personal answers or scores.
You may privately note one fact, one uncertainty and a need you would want to communicate more clearly in future. Read any of the four guides, retake or leave. None of these steps requires a particular score or sending anyone your result.
Website content edition 1.0.0 ·
Source question / scoring / report versions: breakup_mini_original_0.1.0_fm_en_working_v1 / four_complete6_sum_mean4dp_no_ranking_causality_v1 / breakup_mini_four_full8_v1