Loading page content
24 original behavior statements · Four full guides free
Reflect on your own past three months with 24 original statements and four free full guides. Separate behavior records, skipped answers and safety limits without danger labels.
24 questions · about 6 minutes · no signup
Current-page memory only: no saved draft or result, choice uploads or personal-result sharing; analytics is off by default. Reloading, changing language or leaving clears answers.
Preparing the questionnaire. Please wait.
Look back at your own behavior in the past three months. Four separate groups organize responses about conflict, expressed boundaries, impact and follow-through; they do not label a dangerous personality.
The 24 Chinese statements and their four groups come from FermatMind’s original Mini conflict_boundary_signals_likert_24 preview. This web edition adds working English translations and expanded general guides, not a licensed clinical risk instrument.
The source records model-based editorial review, not completed human expert review. Reliability, validity, cognitive interviews, norms and fairness studies have not been completed; other scales’ findings cannot validate this one.
Answer about your own concrete behavior in the past three months. The four parts concern pressure during conflict, reactions to boundaries, responses to impact and follow-through after repair.
Do not assess another person, infer their motives or use this preview for clinical, legal, hiring, school or relationship decisions. No result certifies safety or predicts harm.
Each group has six forward-scored statements. At least four numeric answers make its sum and mean available: add those 1–5 values and divide by their count, rounded to four decimal places.
For 1, 2, 3, 4 and two skips, sum 10 divided by four is 2.5000. Four-decimal display is arithmetic, not psychological precision. No total, ranking, cutoff, probability or normative percentile is calculated.
A 3 means uncertain or depends on the situation and remains numeric; it is not frequency or a medium risk level. Prefer not to answer is excluded without zero or midpoint replacement.
Every statement needs a number or an explicit skip before any personal result. A group with fewer than four numbers has no sum, mean or personal interpretation. If all four groups are insufficient, only the general information and boundaries appear.
The four groups cover different actions and remain separate. Neither the highest group nor their sum creates a personality type, responsibility judgment, abuse determination or forecast.
Lower agreement cannot rule out harmful conduct, and higher agreement cannot establish dangerousness. Actual conduct and consent need their own attention regardless of the numerical record.
The full guides give ordinary hypothetical examples, distinguish intentions from consequences and suggest small private fact checks. Examples illustrate scope; they are not validated explanations of why you acted.
You may skip every suggested exercise. Do not disclose names, seek unwanted contact, override a pause or require anyone to forgive, reassure or validate a result.
Choices and results stay in current-page memory, without saved drafts, persisted results, answer uploads, analytics or personal-result sharing. Reload, language change, departure and retake clear them.
Public guide addresses contain no answers or personal values. They remain readable before answering; opening a guide does not create a personal assessment or restore a past attempt.
If actual threats, violence, coercion, stalking or urgent safety concerns are present, prioritize local emergency services, a trusted supporter or qualified professional services as appropriate. Do not wait for a score.
This page cannot establish or rule out real harm or legal responsibility. A different score on retest does not prove behavior changed, safety improved or future harm became less likely.
Four full guides explain the statements, arithmetic and optional fact checks for conflict pressure, boundaries, impact and repair follow-through. After all 24 numbers or explicit skips, each group needs four numeric answers for a personal sum and mean. A 3 is uncertain or depends. There is no total, ranking or danger judgment. Read all general guides first, without personal responses or values.
Read six conflict-pressure statements, a worked mean, repeated-contact and pause examples, and optional fact checks. No danger labels or predictions.
Explore responses to no, pauses, silence and contact boundaries. Read the six-item arithmetic and consent limits without rating another person.
Separate intention, concrete actions and reported impact. Read six self-report statements, count-aware arithmetic and one optional fact check.
Examine plans, promised updates and changes after a repeated issue. Read six-item scoring and repair boundaries without grading sincerity or predicting recurrence.
No. It summarizes your responses to four groups of concrete statements. Neither high nor low agreement establishes or rules out dangerousness, real harm, a diagnosis or future behavior.
They describe how a statement fits your recollection, not event frequency. A 3 is uncertain or depends on the situation and is included as a numeric answer.
Yes. Explicitly prefer not to answer is a valid choice, excluded without replacement. You do not need to give a reason or repeat an attempt to fill a gap.
Each group needs at least four numeric answers among six. This is a display rule, not a validated clinical threshold. Insufficient groups have no personal numbers or interpretation; available groups remain.
No. It is self-report about your own past three months. It cannot infer another person’s feelings, motives, diagnosis or legal responsibility, or justify continuing contact after a refusal.
Yes. All four bilingual general guides are public and free, before and after answering. They contain no personal records and are separate from any available personal arithmetic.
No draft, persisted result, answer upload, analytics or personal-result sharing is used. The current page holds responses in memory; reload, language change or leaving clears them.
No. Recall, context and willingness to answer can change. Actual behavior and safety concerns need separate attention, without waiting for a score or requiring anyone to restore trust or contact.
Website content edition 1.0.0 ·
Source question / scoring / report versions: conflict_boundary_mini_original_0.1.0_fm_en_working_v1 / four6_min4_skip_sum_mean4dp_no_ranking_v1 / conflict_boundary_four_full8_v1