Loading page content
40 original emotion prompts · No EQ ability score
Reflect on eight emotion families with 40 original context prompts. Read separate frequency means or insufficient information and eight full free guides. No EQ ability score.
40 questions · about 9 minutes · no signup
Choose one ordinary work, study or voluntary-group setting and recall the past four weeks; this window is editorial. Keep the same setting throughout. For each described occasion, rate how often you felt the stated feeling when that occasion applied, from 1 Never to 5 Almost every relevant occasion. If it did not apply, you cannot recall or prefer not to answer, choose the separate unscored option. Do not create, repeat or re-enter an uncomfortable situation for a rating. All 40 recognized choices finish the attempt; each five-item part needs at least three numeric ratings for a mean. No names, private events or conversations are requested.
Preparing the test…
All questions and full results are free, with no signup. Saving is optional; only saved attempts can be resumed after a refresh or language change. Tab drafts expire after 24 hours and clear on completion or retake.
This original FermatMind EQ Dashboard explores remembered Joy, Trust, Fear, Surprise, Sadness, Disgust, Anger and Anticipation in ordinary situations. The eight theoretical emotion families organize reflection; they are not eight emotional-intelligence abilities. Each has five independently written prompts and its own complete guide. We do not administer MSCEIT, WLEIS, the Emotions Profile Index or the competitor questionnaire, and do not calculate an overall EQ, a dominant personality or an emotional-intensity percentage. All eight full readings are free before you start.
Each emotion family has five original frequency statements, all forward-scored from 1 to 5. At least three numeric ratings are needed: add them and divide by the number rated, rounded to one decimal. For example, 2+4+3=9 across three ratings gives 3.0. Unscored is excluded, never zero or a midpoint. All forty statements need a recognized choice before any personal reading. The three-rating minimum is an editorial completeness rule, not a validated or clinical cutoff.
The means summarize how frequently the stated feelings were reported on relevant occasions in your chosen setting. They do not measure intensity, duration, actual occurrence counts, regulation skill or objective emotion-reading ability. Different prompts and opportunities prevent treating the eight values as a dominant-emotion ranking. Higher is not inherently better or worse, and a low mean is different from insufficient information.
All eight complete guides appear together, even for unavailable means. Joy and Sadness can both be reported in different moments; Trust does not cancel Fear. There is no overall average, positive-minus-negative score, wheel area, percentage, tier, winner, fixed personality or clinical severity. Equal or close means are not a tie to break and have no established statistical significance. Different answers can yield the same mean.
Read what each of the 8 parts explores. Your complete result presents them together; they are not mutually exclusive personality types. These public guides contain no one’s answers or personal means.
This reading concerns reported joy in five ordinary contexts. It does not measure optimism, social warmth, well-being or your ability to create a positive mood.
This reading concerns felt trust in five ordinary situations. It does not assess another person’s trustworthiness, relationship safety or your attachment style.
This reading concerns remembered fear or apprehension in five ordinary contexts. It does not measure courage, risk skill, danger or a clinical condition.
This reading concerns remembered surprise in five ordinary situations. It does not measure curiosity, adaptability, attention or how quickly you recover from an unexpected event.
This reading concerns reported sadness around five ordinary losses or disappointments. It does not measure empathy, emotional depth or a clinical condition.
This reading concerns reported aversion to five ordinary sensory or hygiene situations. It does not measure moral standards, discernment or the safety of an object or food.
This reading concerns reported anger or frustration in five ordinary contexts. It does not assess aggression, assertiveness, justice or the effectiveness of a response.
This reading concerns interested, forward-looking feelings in five ordinary contexts. It does not measure planning ability, optimism or whether an expected outcome will occur.
It describes responses to forty original emotion-occurrence prompts, not emotional-intelligence ability. Eight emotion families differ from skill or performance branches. There is no overall EQ, accuracy score, diagnosis or conversion into a core EQ result.
Joy, Trust, Fear, Surprise, Sadness, Disgust, Anger and Anticipation. They use theoretical category names as reflection topics, with five original contexts each. The names do not establish eight independent biological or psychological factors.
All forty recognized choices, including unscored, complete the attempt. Each five-item part uses at least three numeric ratings for its own mean. Unscored is excluded rather than filled; fewer ratings withholds only that part. There are no reverse-keyed items or overall score.
Neither follows. A mean describes selected frequency ratings for those items, not ability, moral worth or emotion intensity. Different opportunities and contexts mean the eight values do not identify a dominant personality or strongest emotion.
No. The forty prompts and eight full readings are original. Plutchik’s theory is background vocabulary, not validation or endorsement. No published test bank, diagram, norm or competitor explanation is administered or reproduced.
All eight guides are free before and after answering, including when information is insufficient. Optional sharing includes only the public title and entry. Answers, means, private events and a personal-result identifier are excluded.
Plutchik’s 2001 article discusses an eight-family theoretical organization of emotion, including conceptual relations and different intensities. It does not validate these forty new items, their mean rule or the four-week window. The diagram, published measures, figures, competitor stimuli and report text are not reproduced. Eight categories are one model rather than a settled inventory of every human feeling; this edition has no established reliability, norms, validity or Chinese–English measurement equivalence.
Read all eight complete guides without an email, account, payment or another-test gate. A personal result stays in this page unless you opt into temporary tab storage; optional sharing copies only the public title and entry, not answers, means or a personal-result ID. You may review a manageable example privately, choose unscored responses or finish without taking action. No emotion-induction, exposure, purchase or contact task is required.
These sources provide background, not validation of this questionnaire or an individual diagnosis.
Website content edition fm_emotion_dashboard_original40_v1 ·
Source question / scoring / report versions: fm_emotion_dashboard_original40_v1 / fm_emotion_dashboard_forward1to5_min3of5_v1 / fm_emotion_dashboard_original8_full_v1