Loading page content
60 original statements · Four full guides free
Explore expression, thinking, lifestyle and public-policy preferences with 60 original statements and four complete free guides.
60 questions · about 10 minutes · no signup
Current-page memory only: no draft or result is saved and choices are not uploaded. Reloading, changing language or leaving clears answers.
Preparing the questionnaire. Please wait.
Take four perspectives on how you describe yourself today. Read each statement as an everyday preference, with no right answer or desired endpoint.
This original self-portrait brings together expression, thinking experience, lifestyle values and selected public-policy preferences. The familiar online four-axes format supplies the topic structure. FermatMind wrote the statements, translation, scoring and reading guides independently.
The axes do not explain one another. A preference for preserving family rituals need not imply a particular economic policy, and an associative imagination does not establish a mental-health condition. Read each bar alongside a concrete example from your life.
Each axis has 15 statements scored 0–4, with seven reverse-keyed as 4 minus the chosen value. The sum is 0–60. The displayed high-end position is sum ÷ 60 × 100, and the other end is 100 minus that value, shown to one decimal. Fifty is a response midpoint, not a population average or probability. All 60 choices are required; no combined type is assigned.
Equal weights are an editorial choice, not an estimated scientific model. Each axis has eight forward and seven reverse statements, so agreeing strongly with every statement produces 53.3 rather than 50.0 at the high end. Different combinations can yield the same sum.
Choosing the middle response is valid when you neither agree nor disagree. It is different from leaving an item blank. If a statement feels too personal or does not fit, you can leave without submitting and read every public guide freely.
A position near the middle may reflect repeated neutral choices or agreement with both ends. A bar cannot distinguish these without looking back at the actual statements. There is no preferred endpoint, ideal profile or instruction to make your beliefs fit a label.
Answers and bars stay in current-page memory. Reloading, changing language or leaving clears them. Copying includes only the same four public guide links, without answers or scores.
No account, name, biological sex, gender identity or party affiliation is requested. The four guide addresses describe whole domains and are identical for every score. You can read them before answering; they are not links to anyone’s personal political or health profile.
Four complete guides explain both ends, middle positions and context on each axis. All 60 valid responses show four positions and all four full readings together, without a combined type. Public pages contain no personal answers or positions and can be read before answering.
Explore direct, self-directed and relational ways of communicating without assigning a sex or gender identity.
Understand familiar explanations, vivid associations and mixed answers without turning them into a clinical label.
Read preferences for familiar practices and revised arrangements without turning tradition or change into a moral ranking.
Explore public provision, market discretion and mixed economic preferences with neutral examples and clear score boundaries.
No. It is an original FermatMind questionnaire informed by the public four-domain format. Its statements, equal weights and guides do not reproduce a proprietary algorithm or inherit another test’s validation.
They locate your response sum within this form’s possible 0–60 range. They are not population percentiles, probabilities or the proportions of people who resemble you.
No. The source format uses normal/abnormal language, which this original version does not adopt as a clinical conclusion. Everyday imagination and associations do not establish a diagnosis.
No. Directness and relational care are available to anyone. This form has no male/female comparison sample and does not infer sex or gender identity.
No. The axes summarize separate selected statements. Neither a lifestyle position nor a public-policy sum identifies a party, vote, moral worth or complete ideology.
They stay only in current-page memory and clear when you reload, change language or leave. The copy button shares four fixed public guide links, without answers, values or an individual profile.
These sources provide background, not validation of this questionnaire or an individual diagnosis.
Website content edition 2026-10-28.2 ·
Source question / scoring / report versions: fm_four_axes_original60_v1 / fm_four_axes_balanced_polarity_0to4_60_v1 / fm_four_axes_four_full_domain_readings_v1