Loading page content
35 original everyday scenarios · Seven complete guides free
Reflect on seven everyday difficulties with 35 original questions. Read separate frequency summaries, concrete examples and seven complete guides for free.
35 questions · about 8 minutes · no signup
Think about the past four weeks. For each situation that was relevant to you, choose how often the described pattern occurred on those occasions. Use Not applicable / prefer not to answer if you had no relevant occasion, cannot judge, or do not wish to answer. Choose one option for all 35 prompts to finish. There are no correct answers.
Preparing the test…
All questions and full results are free, with no signup. Saving is optional; only saved attempts can be resumed after a refresh or language change. Tab drafts expire after 24 hours and clear on completion or retake.
When an ordinary plan stalls, the details can be more useful than a broad judgment about yourself. These original questions explore emotional recovery, self-doubt, direction and attention, outward actions, rigid standards, imagined scenarios, and interest. Each topic has its own descriptive frequency mean when all five answers are numeric. Seven complete guides remain available to everyone. About eight minutes is an editorial estimate; there is no timer.
Think about relevant occasions in the past four weeks. Values 1–5 mean Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often and Almost always. Each five-item topic needs all five numeric answers for its mean, shown to one decimal. Any unscored choice withholds only that topic’s mean. There is no overall score, leading type, severity band or ranking.
Choose Not applicable / prefer not to answer when there was no relevant occasion, you cannot judge or you do not wish to answer. It is not zero, Never or a guessed response. One explicit choice for every prompt finishes the check-in, even if all 35 are unscored. Every complete guide remains readable; an unanswered prompt still needs a choice.
These 35 everyday scenarios and their seven descriptive averages were written for FermatMind. Research on intrapersonal problems informed the topic map only. This check-in is not the Intrapersonal Problems Rating Scales (IPRS), has no established norms or screening cutoffs, and has not inherited the research instrument’s validation. The imagined-scenarios topic deliberately covers everyday mental absorption only; it does not cover the full research domain of Fantasy Proneness or assess unusual perceptual experiences.
Topic background: Boudreaux, Lengel, Oltmanns and Ozer (2021), Assessment of self-related problems in functioning: Intrapersonal Problems Rating Scales, Psychological Assessment, 33(6), 526–540, DOI 10.1037/pas0001007. FermatMind Editorial wrote these everyday scenarios and guides independently. Their averages do not identify a cause, assess personal worth or choose a clinical explanation.
No name or personal story is needed. Answers stay in this browser; optional progress saving follows the visible tab-only controls. Public links lead to general guides, without answers or scores. You can finish here, review one familiar situation privately or return to all tests.
All seven complete guides are public. A completed check-in presents the topics separately in their fixed order. A topic needs all five numeric choices for its descriptive mean. Any unscored choice withholds only that mean; even all 35 unscored choices finish and retain every guide.
This topic concerns how stress or frustration carries into the next part of an ordinary day. It asks about the time and room needed to regain a workable response, rather than whether you ever have strong feelings. A difficult week, repeated interruptions or a demanding environment can all matter when you interpret your own answers.
This topic concerns discouragement, harsh private judgments and uncertainty about your own decisions in everyday situations. It leaves room for the difference between a specific mistake and a sweeping conclusion about yourself. The answers describe what you remember during four weeks; they do not tell you what other people think of you or determine your worth.
This topic separates having a chosen aim from making its next step concrete and staying with it through ordinary distractions. A person can care deeply about an activity while finding it difficult to keep the action in view. The label describes situations, not laziness, moral weakness, intelligence or a diagnosis of an attention condition.
This topic concerns acting before checking consequences, permission or a shared agreement. It includes the practical effect on other people rather than treating every difficulty as private emotion. It is not a claim that someone is dangerous or has a fixed antisocial character. A frequency response cannot settle a disputed event or establish another person’s rights or intentions.
This topic concerns the cost of insisting on an exact method, repeated check or preferred level of polish after a task’s practical purpose is already clear. Care, accuracy and standards can be useful; these prompts focus on situations where extra control delays another needed activity. They do not say that conscientiousness or a preference for order is itself a problem.
This deliberately narrow topic concerns imagined scenes occupying time intended for an available real-world activity. Imagination can be enjoyable and useful. The situations ask about a mismatch with what you meant to do at that moment. They do not rate creativity, the content of your fantasies or unusual perceptions, and do not represent the full research construct called Fantasy Proneness.
This topic concerns whether available, freely chosen activities feel engaging during the past four weeks. It separates the pull toward an activity from the ability to organize its steps. A quiet period, changing interests, limited options or exhaustion can all deserve attention. A few frequency answers cannot identify a cause or label a person as uncaring.
Seven everyday topics: emotional recovery, self-doubt, direction and attention, actions and shared boundaries, rigid standards, imagined scenes taking time, and interest or engagement. They are offered together without choosing a dominant label.
These 35 everyday scenarios and their seven descriptive averages were written for FermatMind. Research on intrapersonal problems informed the topic map only. This check-in is not the Intrapersonal Problems Rating Scales (IPRS), has no established norms or screening cutoffs, and has not inherited the research instrument’s validation. The imagined-scenarios topic deliberately covers everyday mental absorption only; it does not cover the full research domain of Fantasy Proneness or assess unusual perceptual experiences.
Add the five numeric frequency values and divide by five, then show one decimal. For example, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 give 3.0. The example is arithmetic, not a population average or a medium category. The seven means are never added or ranked.
Yes. Select the explicit unscored option for each of the 35 prompts. You receive no numeric means, but all seven complete guides remain available. An unanswered prompt and an unscored choice are different.
No. These original descriptive averages do not establish causes, a dominant type or a severity order. Read the concrete situations and available opportunities. Several topics may overlap in one event without any score explaining another.
Choose one familiar, low-stakes situation if you want and use its guide’s optional observation. You can also leave the result there. If a persistent difficulty concerns you or disrupts daily life, choose support according to that experience rather than waiting for a website cutoff.
These sources provide background, not validation of this questionnaire or an individual diagnosis.
Website content edition 1.0.0 ·
Source question / scoring / report versions: fm_holding_back_original35_fourweeks_v1 / fm_seven_strict5_means_1dp_no_overall_v1 / fm_holding_back_seven_full6_root_copy_v1