Loading page content
Original self-reflection questionnaire · Full results free
Reflect on five intimacy priorities with 25 original statements and full guides. Separate importance from uncertainty, without a type or partner rating.
25 questions · about 5 minutes · no signup
For your own view of adult, voluntary intimacy, rate how important each condition is when discussing communication, expectations and personal boundaries. Rate what matters to you, without judging a partner or describing private acts. Consent and respect are baseline conditions, not points to trade. Choose unscored if uncertain, without a suitable context or unwilling to rate. Respond to all 25 prompts; each part needs at least four numeric ratings for a separate raw mean. No total, ranking or type is generated. You can stop or read every guide without answering.
Preparing the test…
All questions and full results are free, with no signup. Saving is optional; only saved attempts can be resumed after a refresh or language change. Tab drafts expire after 24 hours and clear on completion or retake.
This original reflection considers privacy, playfulness, steadiness, trust and emotional closeness when adults discuss voluntary intimate relationships. It asks about the importance of stated conditions, not sexual acts, history, identity or the quality of a partnership. All five priorities can matter at once. Every full guide is free, and personal responses do not enter public links or ordinary analytics.
Each of five parts has five original prompts. Rate importance from 1, not important to me, to 5, extremely important to me; 3 means moderately important, not missing or neutral about agreement. An uncertain, unsuitable or declined item stays unscored. After all 25 responses, a part needs at least four numeric ratings: sum divided by rated items, rounded to one decimal. With three or fewer, it shows insufficient information instead of a guessed value.
A larger mean records more importance placed on that set of conditions, not a better relationship or a more desirable person. All five parts can be high or equal. No total, percentile, compatibility score or persona is assigned. The same mean can come from different item patterns. Consent and respect remain baseline conditions for every response; no score justifies pressure, disclosure or ignoring another person’s boundaries.
These original conditions focus on intimacy communication, expectations and boundaries. The separate Relationship Values test compares romantic rituals, practical cooperation, emotional companionship and growth/autonomy through forced choices. Its role counts are not converted into privacy or trust means here. Neither test measures orientation, private acts, actual partner behaviour or whether a relationship should continue. This original method has no established psychometric norms or cross-language equivalence.
Read what each of the 5 parts explores. Your complete result presents them together; they are not mutually exclusive personality types. These public guides contain no one’s answers or personal means.
A complete original reading of privacy and personal space, with concrete examples, mixed ratings and clear limits.
A complete original reading of playfulness and variety, with concrete examples, mixed ratings and clear limits.
A complete original reading of steadiness and predictability, with concrete examples, mixed ratings and clear limits.
A complete original reading of trust through clear expectations, with concrete examples, mixed ratings and clear limits.
A complete original reading of emotional closeness, with concrete examples, mixed ratings and clear limits.
It is an original reflection on the importance of intimacy conditions: privacy, playfulness, steadiness, trust and emotional closeness. It asks no sexual history or private acts and infers no orientation, identity, behaviour or partner quality. It is not a published sexual-values scale.
None needs to win. All five raw means remain separate, and every complete guide stays available. Equal or high importance across all five is valid; no tie-break, rank or assigned type is used.
No. Consent and respect are baseline conditions, not scored trade-offs. An importance rating is not permission to pressure someone, publish private information or disregard an agreement. Uncertainty and declining a rating can remain unscored.
All 25 prompts require a response, but a part needs four numeric ratings out of five for a mean. With fewer, its missing data are not filled with zero or the midpoint. You can still read the full general guide without a personal mean.
Optional drafts stay in this browser tab for up to 24 hours and clear on completion, clearing or retake. Sharing copies only the public test title and entry link. Answers and raw means are not put in URLs, public shares or ordinary analytics.
Website content edition fm_intimacy_values25_v1 ·
Source question / scoring / report versions: fm_intimacy_values25_v1 / intimacy25_importance1_5_na_min4_separate5_complete25_v1 / fm_intimacy_values_five_full8_20261029_v1