Loading page content
32 original four-axis choices · 16 full guides free
Take 32 original paired choices across four relationship preferences. Keep every tie and read all 16 complete combination guides free. No signup or compatibility prediction.
32 questions · about 7 minutes · no signup
Use one current or imagined safe relationship situation. Choose the closer option in each of 32 pairs; both may sometimes apply. No right answer or superior side. If neither fits, you may stop and read all guides. Four separate counts, with all 4:4 ties retained.
Preparing the test…
All questions and full results are free, with no signup. Saving is optional; only saved attempts can be resumed after a refresh or language change. Tab drafts expire after 24 hours and clear on completion or retake.
Explore four relationship preferences through 32 original choices, then read your separate counts and every compatible combination in full. All 16 neutral code guides are free and public. Independent reflection edition; no official characters or relationship predictions.
This Love Type Test uses 32 newly written pairs and four separate comparisons: initiating/responding to proposals, receiving/offering care, a practical/romantic starting point, and flexible arrangements/explicit intention. Choose a current or imagined safe relationship situation and keep it in mind throughout. There are no right answers; neither side is better.
The public L/F, C/A, R/P and O/E terms are a framework reference. Our questions, calculation and neutral code readings are independent; this is not the official LoveType test or its character system. The existing two-axis Relationship Preferences Test and four-theme Love Personality Test remain different questionnaires, without a conversion between their results.
Each axis has eight pairs, with each side shown first four times. Select the option closer to what you would prefer in that moment, even if both sometimes apply. Count the chosen letter once on that axis. Five or more choices retain that letter; four each retain both. No total across axes, population percentile, random tie-break, or couple success probability is calculated.
The four retained-letter sets are combined, producing one, two, four, eight, or sixteen compatible codes. All sixteen complete guides are public before answering, and every compatible guide is available in full after completion. No result is interpreted from a partial attempt. If neither option fits well enough, you can stop and read the guides instead; this bank has no not-applicable score.
Four binary comparisons mathematically produce sixteen possible codes; that does not establish sixteen natural personality types. This original bank has no established reliability, validity, norms, or English–Chinese measurement equivalence. Counts describe choices within this edition and situation, not the strength of love, maturity, attachment, fidelity, safety or another person’s inner state.
Use a result as a private prompt for describing a preference. It cannot decide whom to date, whether to stay, or how a relationship will develop. A small optional conversation example is included in each guide, but no contact, disclosure, purchase or matching result from a partner is required.
Answers and counts remain in this browser’s current attempt. Saving progress is optional and uses a session draft valid for 24 hours; you can clear it or continue without saving. Public guide URLs identify a general code only. Sharing copies the public title and entry link, excluding your answers, counts and compatible-code set.
The complete result is free, without an email wall. You can compare all sixteen guides, return to the test list, or finish here. The references below explain the framework context; they do not validate our original questions or authorize conclusions about a real partner.
These are public explanations, not anyone's private attempt. Full reports cover all 8 single directions and every tied combination. Reading one does not affect your score.
You may enjoy getting an ordinary plan moving, being looked after within it, and keeping the next step practical but adjustable. Initiating and receiving care are different jobs: suggesting the afternoon does not require you to provide every form of support.
This combination brings together proposing a direction, wanting care, checking everyday feasibility, and preferring explicit intentions. You might be comfortable initiating the conversation while still wanting reassurance that the arrangement matters to both people. Clarity is a request to discuss, not a right to obtain agreement.
You may like starting a romantic possibility, receiving a tender response, following emotional excitement, and leaving room for the experience to unfold. These choices describe what attracts you in the selected situations. They do not establish that you need constant attention or cannot make practical decisions.
This pattern combines initiating, wanting reassurance, valuing romantic feeling, and seeking clear intention. You might want to express an affectionate idea openly and hear what it means to the other person. The code does not imply entitlement to an equally intense response or prove how committed either person is.
You may enjoy proposing a workable plan, being someone a partner can lean on, and keeping the wider arrangement flexible. Organizing and offering care can reinforce one another, but they are still chosen actions. This combination does not appoint you the relationship’s permanent manager or responsible adult.
This combination joins initiating, offering care, checking practical conditions, and wanting explicit agreements. You might like making a considerate arrangement that both people can rely on. Reliability here is an intended feature of a small agreement, not a measured virtue or a forecast of relationship stability.
You may like opening a romantic experience, giving support within it, following emotional appeal, and preserving spontaneity. A caring initiative can be as small as noticing a shared mood and offering something welcome. This does not establish that grand gestures, surprise, or constant availability are your defining traits.
This combination brings initiative and care together with romantic feeling and explicit intention. You might want to create a meaningful shared moment while also knowing how each person understands it. Planning such a moment does not authorize you to define the relationship for both people or to expect a matching declaration.
You may prefer responding to a partner’s first proposal, receiving some care, checking ordinary feasibility, and keeping the arrangement adaptable. Responding is still an active choice: you can express a preference, suggest changes, or decline. The combination does not imply passivity or a need for another person to make decisions for you.
This combination links responding to another person’s initiative, wanting care, checking practical fit, and preferring clear expectations. You may appreciate an invitation more when its timing and meaning are easy to understand. That preference does not establish dependency, attachment style, or an inability to initiate when necessary.
You may enjoy responding to a romantic opening, being warmly received, following the feeling of connection, and letting details unfold. A response can be enthusiastic and self-directed even when someone else starts. This combination is not a claim that you are naturally compliant, fragile, or destined to need a particular partner.
This pattern combines welcoming a partner’s initiative, wanting reassurance, valuing emotional connection, and seeking explicit intention. You may like an affectionate invitation and also want to understand what it means. Asking about meaning does not guarantee a particular answer or establish a need for constant confirmation.
You may prefer responding to another person’s proposal, offering useful support, checking practical conditions, and allowing room for adjustment. Joining a plan can include a thoughtful contribution rather than merely following instructions. This pattern does not mean that supporting someone else should always take priority over your own preferences.
This combination brings responding, offering care, practical judgment, and explicit expectations together. You may like contributing to a plan once its purpose is clear. Supporting an agreed arrangement is not the same as being assigned a duty, and these choices do not establish that you are more dependable than people with other combinations.
You may enjoy responding to romantic energy, offering warmth, valuing the feeling of connection, and leaving the experience flexible. Supporting a moment can be active even when someone else begins it. This does not imply that you should absorb every mood, accept every invitation, or keep your own wishes out of view.
This combination connects responding to initiative, offering care, valuing romantic meaning, and wanting explicit intention. You may enjoy warmly joining a meaningful proposal once you understand what it means to both people. It does not establish selflessness, loyalty, moral seriousness, or compatibility with a particular four-letter code.
No. This is an independent FermatMind edition with 32 original pairs, an open counting rule and 16 neutral combination guides. It uses public four-axis terms as context, without copying the official bank, algorithm, characters, artwork or result prose.
Each axis has eight choices. A 4:4 tie retains both letters. Cross-combining retained letters gives all compatible codes, from one to sixteen; all complete readings are shown. No random winner, hidden priority or additional tie-break is used.
No. The counts describe choices in this original bank and chosen situation. Reliability, validity, norms and language equivalence are not established. There are no matching pairs, success probabilities, diagnoses of a partner, or predictions about staying together.
All 16 complete guides and every compatible result are free, without signup, email or purchase. Sharing copies only the public test title and entry link. Your answers, counts and compatible-code set are excluded. Saving a browser session draft is optional.
These sources provide background, not validation of this questionnaire or an individual diagnosis.
Website content edition fm_love_type16_original32_v1 ·
Source question / scoring / report versions: fm_love_type16_original32_v1 / fm_love_type16_four_counts_keep_all_ties_v1 / fm_love_type16_original16_full_v1