Loading page content
Original Mini interaction choices · Four full guides free
Compare four pairs of interaction choices with FermatMind’s original 24-item form. Read all four full guides and ties free, without signup or an attractiveness score.
24 questions · about 5 minutes · no signup
Choose the approach that feels more natural to you currently in each situation. Both choices are acceptable; neither is a correct answer. Consider your own current way of interacting, without a required recall period. All 24 choices are needed before any of the four comparisons is interpreted. If neither option fits or you do not wish to choose, you may leave the attempt unfinished; a missing answer is never converted into the other side. This bank records interaction choices and does not ask you to increase disclosure, perform warmth or contact anyone.
Preparing the test…
All questions and full results are free, with no signup. Saving is optional; only saved attempts can be resumed after a refresh or language change. Tab drafts expire after 24 hours and clear on completion or retake.
Looking for a Mote Type test? This is FermatMind’s own interaction-choice version, reused from our original mini-program form. It compares expressive energy and calm presence, direct clarity and tactful pacing, immediate response and later follow-up, and open sharing and bounded reserve. Each pair has six choices. All four full readings are free, including both sides and ties. This version does not assign the four charm archetypes used by other quizzes, rate your appeal or infer how others feel about you. The original bank and this new English translation have not completed psychometric validation.
The original Chinese form contains 24 paired choices, with four groups of six. Its item IDs, order, Chinese wording and pole mapping are preserved. English is a new translation of those original items. The form is an unvalidated editorial self-observation tool, not a translated official Japanese instrument or the same bank and four-type system used by another Mote quiz.
Each answer adds one choice to its named side. The two sides of each group sum to six. Four, five or six choices mean that side was selected more often in this group; three each retain both sides. No total, cross-group rank, percentage, population comparison or combined personality type is calculated. A less-selected approach is not a missing capacity or a defect.
The source paired form has no scored skip option. All 24 answers must be valid before any comparison is interpreted. An unanswered question stays missing, never becomes zero or a vote for the other side, and never produces a substitute result. If neither choice fits or you do not wish to answer, keeping the attempt unfinished is a valid choice.
After all 24 valid paired choices, four groups show separate raw counts across six comparisons each. A 3:3 tie keeps both sides. All four full guides are public, without a combined attractiveness type or an inference about other people’s liking.
This comparison records whether you more often selected a visible expression of energy or a steadier way of participating in six situations. Both can be available to the same person.
Six choices compare stating the point earlier with arranging timing, background and sequence first. A direct message can still be considerate; a tactful introduction can still lead to a clear answer.
This comparison records which moment you prioritised in six paired situations. Responding now and following up later can happen in the same real conversation; the score does not compare kindness or reliability.
Six choices compare earlier personal sharing with keeping information within a chosen boundary. Neither side establishes sincerity, closeness or a right for someone else to know more.
This is FermatMind’s own original interaction-choice form, reused from its mini-program. It reports four separate paired comparisons, not Playful, Regal, Healing or Mysterious archetypes.
Each group has six two-choice items. Count how often each side is selected; the pair sums to six. A 3:3 result keeps both sides. There is no overall winner, combined type, intensity scale or cross-group ranking.
You may leave the attempt unfinished. No comparison is interpreted until all 24 choices are valid; missing is never counted toward either side. The form does not require you to force an answer merely to obtain a result.
No. They record your own choices in this bank, not other people’s reactions. They cannot determine appearance, charm, social worth, compatibility or romantic success. Two approaches can coexist in real interactions even when the question asks for a relative choice.
All 24 questions and all four complete public guides are free without signup. Every guide covers both sides and ties, so no explanation is withheld behind a paid upgrade.
Optional drafts stay in this browser tab for up to 24 hours and clear after completion or reset. Copying shares the public title and URL, without answers or personal counts. You do not need to share a result or contact anyone.
Every completed attempt shows all four dimension guides. Each explains both approaches, all seven possible count pairs, ties, a concrete example, a counterexample and an optional small experiment. There is no hidden result report or paid explanation. The same guide remains useful at 6:0, 3:3 or 0:6 because the arithmetic and the examples are explained rather than replacing them with a fixed charm label.
You can privately review one interaction: what you wanted, what you chose and whether it worked for that situation. Nobody owes disclosure, warmth, contact or a change of personality because of a result. The questionnaire cannot establish popularity, social value, relationship compatibility, employment suitability or the reasons another person likes you. Sharing a link shares a public page, not your answers or counts.
Website content edition 1.0.0 ·
Source question / scoring / report versions: 0.2.0-preview / 0.2.0-preview / fm_interaction_pairs_four_full_readings_v1