Loading page content
Original policy-choice edition · Two axes and four full guides free
Compare 36 original policy choices on separate economic left–right and social communitarian–liberal axes. Read raw counts, ties, uncertainty and all four full guides.
36 questions · about 8 minutes · no signup
Treat each item as a hypothetical policy discussion. Choose the proposal you would prefer under the stated conditions, without assuming it describes current law or guarantees an outcome. The two alternatives are deliberately limited. If neither represents your position, the context is unclear or you prefer not to answer, select NA. All thirty-six items require a selection. Each axis needs all eighteen valid choices for its own counts and coordinate; any NA withholds only that axis. A combined point needs both axes complete. Optional progress stays in this browser tab. Do not enter personal identifiers.
Preparing the test…
All questions and full results are free, with no signup. Saving is optional; only saved attempts can be resumed after a refresh or language change. Tab drafts expire after 24 hours and clear on completion or retake.
This original bilingual edition asks about hypothetical public policies, not personal lifestyle habits. Eighteen comparisons concern economic provision, ownership, taxation and bargaining; eighteen concern shared civic purposes and individual civic freedom. For each item choose between two stated proposals, or keep uncertainty with the separate NA. Every item has equal weight. The result describes the choices offered here, not your complete political outlook or a place in a population. This is not the IDRlabs bank, Political Compass, SECS or a conversion from 8values. All thirty-six items and four full guides are free, with no signup.
Economic left–right here compares greater public provision, redistribution or collective economic influence with greater private financing, owner discretion or retention of earnings. The separate social communitarian–liberal axis compares common civic purposes, obligations and continuity with voluntary participation, neutral rules and individual civic freedom. These are this edition’s definitions for the offered proposals, not personal lifestyle, moral worth, authoritarianism, a political party or a universal map of societies. The policy choices and equal-count rule are our original materials; theory references do not validate the instrument.
All thirty-six items need a selection. With eighteen valid choices on an axis, count both endpoints: economic x = right minus left, social y = liberal minus communitarian. Each coordinate runs from −18 to +18 in steps of two, without normalization, weights or percentages. Twelve left and six right give x = −6; seven communitarian and eleven liberal give y = +4. Zero is a valid nine-to-nine tie, retaining both adjacent comparisons; two zero axes retain all four. A positive sign is a drawing convention, not approval. All four full guides always remain available.
Any NA withholds its own axis’s personal endpoint counts and coordinate while preserving the valid count; the other complete axis can still be read. No combined point or quadrant comparison is assigned until both axes are complete. Unanswered items remain incomplete rather than becoming NA or zero. The new prompts, bilingual wording and counting rule have no established psychometric or cultural-equivalence validation. No population ranks, purity levels, leader or party comparisons, political predictions or personalized political persuasion are generated. Optional tab drafts expire after twenty-four hours and clear on completion or retake; share text contains public titles and links only.
Four complete public guides compare combinations of the two axes in this original bank, not fixed personalities or party identities. After all 36 selections, each eighteen-item axis shows its endpoint counts and raw difference separately. A zero axis retains adjacent comparisons; any NA withholds only its own axis. All four full texts stay available. Public pages contain no personal answers or coordinates; read before deciding whether to answer.
This reading describes a count pattern in two sets of hypothetical policy proposals: more economic-left choices and more communitarian choices. It does not identify a party, a moral character or a position in a real population.
This comparison links more economic-left selections with more liberal selections on the separate social axis. Read it as a description of the offered proposals, without converting it into a party label or a claim about all your beliefs.
More private financing or owner discretion on the economic items can occur alongside more shared obligations and cultural continuity on the social items. This is one comparison of this bank’s choices, with no automatic party, national or moral identity.
This comparison brings together more economic-right proposals and more liberal proposals on the separate social axis. It reports the pattern of these selections without measuring ideological purity, political knowledge or a real-world group identity.
An original FermatMind bilingual edition with thirty-six hypothetical policy comparisons, eighteen on each of two explicitly defined axes. It does not reproduce a competitor’s questionnaire or import another quiz’s scoring key.
The economic axis compares the offered public or collective economic proposals with private-discretion proposals. The social axis compares shared civic purposes and obligations with individual civic freedom and voluntary participation. It does not equate a preference for community with authoritarianism.
With eighteen valid choices, count each endpoint. Economic x is right minus left; social y is liberal minus communitarian. Both use raw differences from −18 to +18 in steps of two. No percentage, weight, hidden centering or population comparison is used.
Nine to nine is a valid zero and keeps both neighboring comparisons. Two zero axes keep all four. Any NA instead withholds only its own axis’s personal counts and coordinate; the combined point waits for both complete axes. Every full guide stays available.
No. It describes choices between these limited hypothetical proposals. There are no population norms, party or politician placements, purity scores, voting predictions or established cross-language validity. The chart’s positive directions are drawing conventions rather than approval.
All questions and all four complete bilingual guides are free without signup. Optional progress is limited to this tab for up to twenty-four hours and clears on completion or retake. Copying shares a public title and link without personal answers or coordinates.
These sources provide background, not validation of this questionnaire or an individual diagnosis.
Website content edition 1.0.0 ·
Source question / scoring / report versions: 1.0.0 / 1.0.0 / 1.0.0