Loading page content
Seven separate observations · Full guides free
Use FermatMind's original 28-item reflection with new working English. Read seven full guides free, with separate sums and means and no moral ranking, good-or-evil total or assigned virtue type.
28 questions · about 8 minutes · no signup
For each original statement, choose the 1–5 option that best describes what you can currently confirm. 3 means uncertain or depends on the situation and remains numeric. All 28 responses must be valid before any personal interpretation; there is no NA option. You may leave or read all seven full guides without answering. No response is a virtuous answer, and no particular mean is a goal.
Preparing the test…
All questions and full results are free, with no signup. Saving is optional; only saved attempts can be resumed after a refresh or language change. Tab drafts expire after 24 hours and clear on completion or retake.
What becomes noticeable when recognition, resources, attraction, comparison, immediate rewards, anger or getting started enter an everyday choice? These 28 original statements provide seven separate reading prompts. Cultural names open the discussion; they do not judge faith, character, a soul or a person's worth. Each group may combine a reaction with a way of responding, so an average is never the whole explanation.
All twenty-eight original statements use 1–5 agreement choices. Midpoint 3 means uncertain or depends on the situation and is numeric. Each four-item group is added separately (4–20) and divided by four (1–5), with no reverse key. The display retains quarter steps such as 1.25. There is no total, cross-group ranking or high/low band. The mean summarizes unlike statements; read their wording and context rather than treating it as one intensity.
All twenty-eight responses must be valid before any personal interpretation appears. There is no NA option. A missing or invalid response withholds every group, rather than filling gaps or publishing partial meanings. You can leave without a score and read all seven full guides free. Equal sums remain equal; they do not mean a balance between sins and virtues or equivalent psychological meaning.
This is FermatMind's original seven-group Mini form, adapted for the web with unchanged Chinese statements and new working English. These groups can combine reactions with ways of responding. Sins and virtues are cultural metaphors only; neither the original nor the translation is a validated moral, religious, ability or diagnostic scale. Complete personal results and all full public guides are free, without registration.
Read all seven full guides first. All twenty-eight valid answers are needed for seven separate four-item sums and means; midpoint 3 is numeric. There is no total, ranking or moral verdict, and equal numbers do not imply equal psychological meaning.
Four statements consider outside feedback, self-evaluation and the wish to be seen.
Four statements consider keeping resources, maintaining a margin and deciding whether to share.
Four statements consider attention being drawn, checking willingness and clarifying boundaries.
Four statements consider comparison, differences in opportunity, disappointment and appreciation.
Four statements consider attention to immediate rewards under pressure or while waiting, and decisions about pausing.
Four statements consider bodily or emotional signals and response timing when something feels unfair, blocked or misunderstood.
Four statements consider starting a task, recovery from fatigue, ending a break and lowering the threshold for action.
No. You receive seven separate observations and their full guides, not a leading sin, first virtue, good-or-evil total or fixed identity.
All items are forward agreement choices 1–5. Each group's four response numbers are added (4–20), then divided by four (1–5). Sums and means stay separate across seven groups.
No. It is the source's numeric midpoint. There is no NA option; you can leave without a score and still read every full guide.
No. The statements and their mixtures differ. A larger mean is not a more important weakness, a stronger trait or a worse moral standing.
Only equal arithmetic in this attempt. It is not a balance of sins and virtues, equivalent meaning, a combined personality or equal seriousness.
It is a culturally framed, original reflection, without psychometric validation. Religious references explain names, not a scoring key, endorsement or evidence of validity.
Only an actively saved, compatible tab draft can be resumed, for at most 24 hours. Completion, clearing or retaking removes it. This web edition stores no final-result cache.
Chinese keeps all 28 original Mini statements. English is a new working translation; expanded guides and the web display have no independent validation.
Any missing or invalid response withholds all seven groups. Incompatible source or content versions make the edition unavailable; they do not cause a fallback personality.
No. These are your responses to a small original item set, not evidence about someone else, permission to ignore consent, or a basis for consequential decisions.
The early lineage of the seven capital sins is associated with Christian monastic and ascetic traditions. Frameworks called seven virtues also include theological and cardinal traditions, while other discussions contrast virtues with sins. Different traditions cannot be merged into one exclusive list. The product borrows cultural metaphors only: its seven observation groups do not claim a one-to-one historical correspondence or religious endorsement.
These seven groups are a product-created everyday observation framework. Historical cultural concepts are not modern measured psychological constructs; religious language is not scientific evidence for this questionnaire.
This is not a doctrine examination or a judgment of faith. It does not preach or condemn and respects believers and nonbelievers.
First note five things: sins and virtues are cultural metaphors here; there is no good-or-evil score, moral level or ranking of people; seven groups are read separately without a total, ranking or bands; a result concerns agreement with this set of statements in this attempt; groups may combine reactions and ways of responding, so a mean is not a single intensity.
Seven separate groups each have a sum of four responses and a mean on the 1–5 scale. There is no total.
A raw sum adds four response numbers and ranges 4–20. It concerns this attempt, without establishing a level.
The mean divides the sum by four and ranges 1–5. A mean nearer 5 indicates more overall agreement with those statements; a mean nearer 1 indicates less agreement.
Read the groups separately. Do not combine, subtract or rank them as more important than one another.
There is no overall score, good-or-evil score, sin index or virtue index.
No group is selected as a greatest weakness, leading sin or first virtue. There is no winner.
There are no high, medium or low bands, normality labels, red alerts or moral-risk levels.
A number summarizes agreement across four statements. Read the statements and context together; the aggregate does not explain the reasons behind a response or establish a statement as a fact about your behaviour.
Some groups combine reactions with ways of responding: attraction with checking boundaries, reward appeal with deciding to pause, anger signals with leaving time to respond, and starting difficulty with making a first step easier. No group is one underlying intensity.
Results do not judge good and evil, character or a soul. They are not for shame, punishment, reward or evaluating another person.
Results do not assign a sins personality, virtues personality, original-sin type, dark personality or fixed identity.
This is not a medical, psychological or psychiatric diagnosis and does not assess mental health or personality disorders.
Results do not judge willpower, discipline, self-control, work ability or moral cultivation, and do not predict addiction, violence or dangerousness.
Do not use results to decide hiring, admissions, a relationship, responsibility or other consequential matters.
Choices involving another person require their explicit, voluntary and revocable consent. This reflection supplies no permission or exemption.
This web edition keeps an active attempt in memory. Only choosing Save progress places individual responses in sessionStorage for this tab, for at most 24 hours. Refreshing or changing language offers recovery only for a saved, compatible draft. Completing, clearing or retaking removes it; closing the tab may end the session. No final-result cache is stored here. Raw answers and these personal sums are not sent by this local scoring flow, and copying uses only the public entry title and URL.
This is for entertainment and self-exploration, without established reliability, validity, norms, fairness, percentiles or accuracy evidence.
Psychometric validation is incomplete. These statements are not themselves evidence of validity, diagnosis, assessment or moral judgment.
On a later attempt, answer from what you can confirm then. A different result may reflect context, pressure or interpretation; it does not automatically establish a change in personality or morality.
Insufficient responses: missing or invalid answers mean no personal factor interpretation. You may continue or leave. Only a draft you actively saved in this web tab is recoverable; an incomplete attempt makes no final result cache. No result is not avoidance of flaws and does not require an explanation about your character.
Unavailable edition: incompatible item, scoring or content versions stop interpretation. Old results and partial meanings are not substituted. This is a version problem, not a judgment of your responses; no repeated immediate attempt is required.
Equal numbers: two or more identical raw sums establish identical numbers only. There is no tie-break, combined personality, sin–virtue balance or equal seriousness. Statements differ across groups, so read each complete guide separately.
These sources provide background, not validation of this questionnaire or an individual diagnosis.
Website content edition 1.0.0 ·
Source question / scoring / report versions: 0.1.0-preview / 0.1.0-preview / 0.2.0-editorial-candidate