Loading page content
Original self-reflection questionnaire · Full results free
Use 20 original ratings for four separate A/B-related behaviour reflections. Full guides free; no fixed type, overall score, health or career verdict.
20 questions · about 5 minutes · no signup
Recall ordinary activities over the past four weeks where you had some choice. Rate how often each statement applied from 1 Never to 5 Almost always. Choose NA when context or choice was absent, information is insufficient or you prefer not to answer. Twenty original items separately explore felt time urgency, competitive comparison, irritation during ordinary waits and difficulty stopping chosen activities. Each part has five items, two oppositely worded as six minus a valid response; at least three ratings permit a one-decimal mean. NA is excluded without zero-filling and insufficient information stays explicit. Parts remain separate without a total, highest-score personality or fixed A/B assignment; the body explains the framework and mixed patterns. This is no Jenkins, Bortner, clinical screening or cardiac-risk instrument and assesses no health, ability, morality or job fit.
Preparing the test…
All questions and full results are free, with no signup. Saving is optional; only saved attempts can be resumed after a refresh or language change. Tab drafts expire after 24 hours and clear on completion or retake.
Added hurry, comparison, irritation during a wait and continuing beyond an endpoint can be different experiences. Twenty original items separately record how often you encountered them over four weeks in ordinary situations with some choice. Full guides explain the A/B framework and mixed patterns. This edition presents four means or insufficient-information states and all full text, without a total or fixed A, B or Balanced assignment. Actual duties, resources and health require their own facts.
After all 20 selections, calculate four parts separately. Each has five items rated 1 Never, 2 Rarely, 3 Sometimes, 4 Often or 5 Almost always. Two opposite statements per part, eight overall, use six minus a valid response. NA means absent context, insufficient information or declining to answer; exclude it without zero or midpoint substitution. At least three ratings permit a one-decimal mean from 1 to 5, using scored sum divided by rated items. Otherwise retain insufficient information without borrowing another part’s score. Parts produce no total, highest-score type, A/B score, percentile or fixed label. Equal means stay equal; decimals establish no significance or change. A middle mean proves no flexibility, ideal moderation or health. The minimum is a website completeness convention, without norms, scientific cutoffs, reliability or validity evidence.
Type A and Type B are historical names in discussions of behaviours such as urgency, competition and impatience, rather than two fixed personalities measured here. Research instruments can differ in structure; a familiar concept establishes no questionnaire validity. This edition offers four separate frequency reflections and all full guides, without an A, B or Balanced assignment from a highest mean, total or cutoff. Mixed can mean different settings, different parts or contrasting answers within a part; it proves neither ideal flexibility, superiority nor a population majority. Insufficient information is not Type B.
Time urgency concerns added hurry, competitive comparison other people, waiting irritation a feeling during an ordinary pause, and difficulty stopping an available endpoint. Parts can differ and can each be higher, lower or insufficient; decimals establish no true cause. All four full guides appear together with higher, lower and mixed readings, examples, wording, counterexamples and optional observations. Scores, NA, signup and other tests never hide the body.
Read what each of the 4 parts explores. Your complete result presents them together; they are not mutually exclusive personality types. These public guides contain no one’s answers or personal means.
Explore added hurry in a chosen organising activity, with higher, lower and mixed readings, examples and limits; no fixed A/B, ability or health verdict.
Explore comparison in an ordinary activity without a contest, with higher, lower and mixed readings; no equation with ambition, excellence, selfishness or a fixed A type.
Explore irritation in an ordinary brief wait, with mixed readings, examples and limits, without labels of hostility, illness, morality or fixed A/B type.
Explore additions beyond a chosen activity’s endpoint, with mixed readings, examples and limits; no verdict of diligence, procrastination, addiction or a fixed A/B type.
Type A and Type B are historical names in discussions of behaviours such as urgency, competition and impatience, rather than two fixed personalities measured here. Research instruments can differ in structure; a familiar concept establishes no questionnaire validity. This edition offers four separate frequency reflections and all full guides, without an A, B or Balanced assignment from a highest mean, total or cutoff. Mixed can mean different settings, different parts or contrasting answers within a part; it proves neither ideal flexibility, superiority nor a population majority. Insufficient information is not Type B.
The editorial observation categories are felt time urgency, competitive comparison, irritation during ordinary waits and difficulty stopping chosen activities, each with five original frequency items. They are separate rather than exclusive types or established factors from a standard instrument. All four full guides are available before and after answering.
After all 20 selections, calculate four parts separately. Each has five items rated 1 Never, 2 Rarely, 3 Sometimes, 4 Often or 5 Almost always. Two opposite statements per part, eight overall, use six minus a valid response. NA means absent context, insufficient information or declining to answer; exclude it without zero or midpoint substitution. At least three ratings permit a one-decimal mean from 1 to 5, using scored sum divided by rated items. Otherwise retain insufficient information without borrowing another part’s score. Parts produce no total, highest-score type, A/B score, percentile or fixed label. Equal means stay equal; decimals establish no significance or change. A middle mean proves no flexibility, ideal moderation or health. The minimum is a website completeness convention, without norms, scientific cutoffs, reliability or validity evidence.
No. Different answer combinations can produce the same middle mean, and parts can differ. There is no norm, ideal position or health interpretation. This edition assesses no ability, output, emotional intelligence or illness and infers no other person’s feelings, actual task requirement or external pressure from your mean.
This original FermatMind 20-item reflection draws on A/B behaviour discussions to organise four weeks of ordinary experiences with some actual choice. Its four parts are editorial observation categories, not four website dimensions validated by the cited research. It replaces no Jenkins Activity Survey, Bortner scale, structured interview, MMPI or other standard instrument and adopts none of their items, keys or norms, nor a competitor’s twelve items or result text. English and Chinese questions, examples, mappings and explanations are independently authored, without local psychometric validation or established language equivalence. Historical A/B names explain a discussion rather than assigning a fixed A, B or Balanced type or assuming several dimensions are identical. Sources explain concepts and measurement limits without validating this questionnaire: the 1990 Bortner findings concern a particular measure and sample, and the 2012 six-facet study does not validate these four parts. Results diagnose no illness, hostility, anxiety, work addiction or other psychological state, estimate no cardiac or other health risk and assess no ability, IQ, genetics, morality, output, relationship, hiring or career fit. Actual duties and external constraints require their own facts.
Yes, without signup, email or another test to unlock anything. Read all four full guides first; all 20 selections produce four means or explicit insufficient-information states. Retaking clears this attempt. Optional sharing contains no answers or means; further assessments require separate answers.
Answers are scored in your browser without uploading them or placing them in URLs or analytics. Drafts require opt-in, restore only in this tab, expire after 24 hours and clear on completion, retake or exit-and-clear. Optional sharing contains public test information and a link without answers or means. Full results are free without signup or email. Further assessments are optional and require separate answers rather than conversion from this edition.
These sources provide background, not validation of this questionnaire or an individual diagnosis.
Website content edition 1.0.0 ·
Source question / scoring / report versions: 1.0.0 / 1.0.0 / 1.0.0