Original · Just for fun · Full results free
Six shared-choice scenes compare clarifying criteria, taking turns, trying a small sample and choosing separate parts. Four complete decision-style portraits await.
6 questions · about 2 minutes · no signup or prerequisite test
Follow each question’s wording. There are no right answers, and your complete result appears here immediately.
Imagine two willing people choosing an ordinary leisure activity. No method is best for every situation, and the four approaches can be combined. The result describes the choices in this game rather than fairness, decisiveness or the quality of a relationship.
Settling a small shared choice through explicit criteria, a turn arrangement, a bounded trial or a divisible plan.
Each option adds its declared points to a portrait. The highest total leads; ties show every leading portrait in the authored order. No result is drawn at random. Points belong only to this quiz, not a psychological scale or population ranking.
Every question, full portrait, example, and small experiment is free. Answers are evaluated in your browser, never sent to a server or put in the URL. Tab-session saving is optional, expires after 24 hours, and is not reused after a quiz-version change. It clears on completion, exit-and-clear, or retake. You can still finish on this page if storage is unavailable.
These are public portrait introductions, not anyone’s personal answers or result. No portrait is superior; different situations may bring out different sides.
Your shared choice becomes clearer when the relevant conditions are named. Time, interest or effort can be discussed before an option wins. The portrait follows your chosen decision method, not a score for rationality or a claim that feelings are less important.
Your shared plan gives choosing a turn rather than asking every occasion to contain both first preferences. The arrangement remains something both people can revise. The result is not proof that exact alternation is the fairest method in every relationship.
Your decision starts with a little actual experience. A small sample can answer something discussion alone has not settled. The ending values a bounded test without claiming that another trial is always better than accepting a no.
Your plan asks whether the choice can have more than one part. Separate preferences do not always need a single winner. The portrait describes a divisible leisure arrangement, not a claim that splitting up is the answer to every disagreement.
Content and rules version 1.0.0 · Substantive update