Loading page content
Preparing content…
SOC 17-3012 · O*NET 17-3012.00
Under the U.S. combined framing 17-2070, designs, develops, and tests electrical and electronic equipment, components, and systems and turns requirements, standards, cost, and safety constraints into manufacturable, testable, and verifiable solutions and documents.
Model impact index for three equally weighted representative core tasks; not a measured share of working time or a job-loss probability. floor((75+50+25)/3+0.5)=50; fermatmind-ai-impact-v1; 2026-10-18.
The focus is not “liking electronic products,” but whether you can link design — simulation — testing — change — compliance into a checkable closed loop under requirements, interface, standards, and cost constraints.If you only want to give conclusions quickly, avoid records and checking, or are unwilling to accept review and revision, the actual work will be very hard.
Adjacent engineering positions have similar names but different responsibilities: design responsibility and signature and technical approval authority are verified per organizational rules, applicable standards, and the jurisdiction.
Try first if: you are willing to check designs per standards and processes, can record assumptions and deviations, accept review comments, and stop when conditions or authorization are unclear.AI can be used as a controlled aid for organizing materials and retrieval, but generated content must not be treated as unchecked parameters, criteria, or design conclusions.
Occupational boundary: U.S. BLS SOC 17-2070 “Electrical and Electronics Engineers” is an official combined statistical framing covering 17-2071 Electrical Engineers and 17-2072 Electronics Engineers (except computer); this page states things under the combined framing and labels each figure as combined or sub-occupation scope. This occupation designs, develops, and tests electrical and electronic equipment, components, and systems and may provide technical guidance on design, manufacturing, and installation; it is not the same as computer hardware engineers (17-2061), who focus on computer equipment design, nor the same as electrical and electronic engineering technologists and technicians (17-3023), who focus on implementation, testing, and maintenance records and typically work under the guidance of engineering staff.
Career direction comparison
Compare design object, input, responsibility boundaries, and delivery; do not substitute based on names or shared tools.
| Career direction | Core work and outputs | Key differences | Which choice is a better fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electronics Engineers, Except Computer (electronics-engineers-except-computer) | Researches, designs, develops, and tests electronic components and systems, such as communications, control, instrumentation, and consumer electronics circuits. | Focuses mainly on electronic circuit and device design, unlike the power and distribution systems on the electrical side. | A better fit if you prefer circuit-level design and device selection and are responsible for signals and electromagnetic compatibility. |
| Electrical Engineers (electrical-engineers) |
AI's impact on the occupation
AI and automation tools can assist with literature and manual retrieval, simulation parameter organization, test data analysis, and document drafts; they cannot replace standard conformity judgments, safety and failure analysis, measurement condition confirmation, and design approval. AI Impact Score 50% is an editorial estimate. Model impact index for three equally weighted representative core tasks; not a measured share of working time or a job-loss probability. floor((75+50+25)/3+0.5)=50; fermatmind-ai-impact-v1; 2026-10-18.The three tasks, ratings and sources are listed in the FermatMind method source record on this page.
FermatMind AI Impact Score estimation method v1
FermatMind / 费马测试 · 2026-10-18
Mainland China pay reference
Chinese pay framing
Public material classifications
Insufficient evidence: no national single-occupation framing was obtained
Insufficient evidence: no national single-occupation framing was obtainedNationwide 2025 pre-tax annual average: non-private/private manufacturing 113,594/76,055 yuan; technical services 182,064/83,560 yuan. These are broad-scope industry proxies only, not an electrical and electronics engineer median or individual take-home pay.
Insufficient evidence: a single recruitment quote is not used to substitute for occupational wages
U.S. pay reference
The 17-2070 combined median is 125,040 USD/year (60.12 USD/hour, May 2025). The combined 10/25/75/90 percentiles were not obtained this round, and the two sub-occupations are not stitched together into a combined distribution.
| Framing | Value | Statistical position | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low end | Insufficient evidence: no combined-occupation percentile was obtained this round | Combined 17-2070 10th percentile not obtained | Sub-occupation reference: the 10/50/90 percentiles for electrical 17-2071 are 76,550/120,630/184,300 USD/year (May 2025); these cannot serve as the combined occupation's low end. |
| Median | 125,040 USD/year (60.12 USD/hour, May 2025) | Combined-framing (17-2070) median | The combined-framing median is 125,040 USD/year (60.12 USD/hour, May 2025); half of practitioners are below and half above this value. |
Career fit guide
Fit depends on whether you can link requirements, interfaces, standards, design, and verification into a checkable chain and stop when conditions or authorization are unclear.Interest codes are used only to explore directions and are not used for hiring or capability conclusions.
Worth experiencing further： Positive signal: proactively checks requirements and versions, keeps measurement conditions and deviations, and explains the reasons for design trade-offs.
Check the real conditions first： Caution signal: tends to skip simulation and measured-data comparison, is unwilling to maintain version and change records, or delivers unverified conclusions directly.
Do a small trial first： Verification action: complete a design exercise from fictional requirements and make two variants, one on “device derating” and one on “test criteria change”.
Work pressure and occupational boundaries
Identify six categories of risk: high-voltage and stored energy, design compliance, version and change, device substitution, test criteria, and AI overreach.
The six risks and measures are an editorial summary; the occupational profile supports tasks, OSHA supports the conditional machine maintenance energy scope, and NIST supports general AI risk methods, none of which provides occupational incident rates.
Typical scenario：Touching equipment during live commissioning when stored-energy equipment discharge or capacitor residual charge has not been confirmed.
Main positions：Power and electrical system design, field commissioning positions
Possible consequences：Can cause personal injury and equipment damage and change accident and compliance responsibility.
Entering the field, qualifications, and career development
A related engineering bachelor's degree is typical in the U.S., and an entry-level PE license is usually not required; Chinese position conditions and registered engineering design business requirements are checked separately, without generalizing a unified national education requirement.
Career prospects and transitions to related occupations
The U.S. combined framing was about 297,900 in 2025, with a projected 8% increase over 2025—2035 (much faster than average).This outlook corresponds only to the U.S. combined framing and does not represent China or a specific employer or an individual's hiring probability.
United States · O*NET-SOC 17-2070 (combined framing)
8% (much faster than average)
Employment growth
Projected growth under the combined framing; the sub-occupations (17-2071／17-2072) have different growth rates and must be checked separately.
Cannot show：A projection is not a guarantee of individual hiring.
Under the U.S. combined framing 17-2070, this occupation designs, develops, and tests electrical and electronic equipment, components, and systems, turning requirements, standards, cost, and safety constraints into manufacturable, testable, and verifiable solutions and documents, and provides technical guidance on design, manufacturing, and installation.
Choose a real task from this page for a small practice project or a conversation with someone in the field. Use the planning guides to set a date, an output and feedback questions before deciding whether to continue.
Be cautious if: you tend to skip simulation and measured-data comparison, are unwilling to maintain version and change records, or deliver unverified conclusions directly.Fit should be judged using real design task samples, review feedback, and qualification checks, and is not replaced by an interest type or a single test.
Low-risk test: using fictional requirements and device manuals, complete one “requirements — solution — test criteria — record” exercise to judge your work preferences; it is not equivalent to qualification, practice, or hiring.All paper exercises on this page use fictional materials; real high-voltage, live, stored-energy, and field work is carried out by trained and authorized personnel under the applicable rules.
First check the design object and requirement version, interface definitions, applicable standards, and permissions, then confirm simulation or test conditions; when input is missing or versions conflict, flag it for checking and escalate first and do not fill it in with assumptions.
Governed by requirement specifications and interface definitions
Includes cost, schedule, and supply chain constraints
A closed loop means the complete chain from requirement confirmation to verification and change documentation; issuing drawings does not mean the work is done. If any step lacks a version, criteria, or authorization, the conclusion cannot be passed forward.
| Dimension | Main directions | Comparison direction |
|---|---|---|
| Requirements and interfaces | Confirm requirement version, interface definitions, and applicable standards | Record assumptions and open items |
| Solution and trade-offs | Compare the trade-offs among performance, cost, reliability, and safety | Keep alternatives and the reasons for the trade-offs |
| Simulation and calculation | Complete simulation, calculation, and tolerance analysis under boundary conditions | Record models, parameters, and versions |
| Prototype and testing | Test per criteria and record measurement conditions and results each time | Record deviations separately and retest |
| Compliance and safety | Verify electrical safety, electromagnetic compatibility, and product standards | Hand matters beyond scope to a qualified role for confirmation |
| Changes and documentation | Submit changes per process and update drawings and bills of materials | Keep software configuration consistent with the physical object |
| Handover and mass production | Hand design and process requirements to manufacturing, procurement, and the field | Mass production introduction is approved by an authorized role |
Design delivery: complete the schemes, calculations, and drawings for circuits, control and signal systems, power and distribution equipment, and embedded and communication electronic components so the design is manufacturable, testable, and verifiable.
Analysis and trade-offs: turn requirement specifications, interface definitions, applicable standards, simulation and test data, and cost and schedule constraints into design parameters, recording assumptions, boundary conditions, and open items.
Testing and verification: define test criteria and verification plans, record measurement conditions and results each time, handle deviations and retest, and produce traceable reports.
Compliance and safety: verify electrical safety, electromagnetic compatibility, and product standard conformity, assess key failure modes, protection, and redundancy, and hand matters beyond qualification scope to a qualified role.
Collaboration and guidance: collaborate with technicians, manufacturing, procurement, suppliers, and project management, review supplier parts and processes, and guide assembly and installation.
Documentation and governance: maintain design change, version, review, and approval records and ensure drawings, bills of materials, software configuration, and the physical object on site are consistent.
At least design trade-offs, device and process selection, test criteria and tolerances, compliance and failure risk, and when to stop and hand the decision to a qualified role.
Turn performance, cost, reliability, and safety constraints into design criteria.
Confirm the electrical or electronic design object, requirement version, and interfaces.
Keep simulation models, parameters, and measured conditions and explain deviations.
Standard applicability and conformity are checked by a role with the competence and authority, and sealing authority is not inferred from a job title.
| Designs, develops, and tests electrical equipment and systems, such as power generation, transmission and distribution, motor drives, and industrial electrical controls. |
| Focuses mainly on the safety, capacity, and reliability of power and electrical systems, unlike the electronic signal chain direction. |
| A better fit if you prefer working with high voltage, high current, and distribution systems and taking on the corresponding safety responsibility. |
| Computer Hardware Engineers (computer-hardware-engineers) | Researches, designs, develops, and tests the hardware of computers and related equipment, such as processors, boards, and storage systems. | Focuses on computer architecture and digital hardware, a different scope from general electrical and electronic systems. | A better fit if you prefer going deep into digital architecture, board-level design, and coordination with low-level drivers. |
|---|
| Mechanical Engineers (mechanical-engineers) | Plans and designs mechanical equipment and systems, dealing with structure, materials, thermal, and motion problems. | The work object changes to mechanical systems and mechanics problems, requiring added mechanics of materials and mechanical design fundamentals. | A better fit if you prefer structures, mechanisms, and manufacturing processes over circuits and signals. |
|---|
| Mechatronics Engineers (mechatronics-engineers) | Researches, designs, develops, and tests automation, intelligent systems, and industrial controls, combining mechanical, electrical and electronic, and software. | Leans more toward system integration and control algorithms, with heavier cross-discipline interface responsibility. | A better fit if you are willing to do system-level design at the intersection of mechanical, electronic, and software. |
|---|
| Electrical and Electronics Drafters (electrical-and-electronics-drafters) | Uses CAD and drafting specifications to draft and revise electrical and electronic system drawings and documents. | Mainly drawing and document delivery, without design or technical approval responsibility. | A better fit if you prefer focusing on drafting standards and drawing and document management rather than design analysis. |
|---|
Adjacent directions differ in design responsibility, authorization, and education, and theory, tools, and responsibility evidence must be added separately.
Use checkable design or test deliverables next to verify the direction.
Editorial ratings use the existing occupational responsibilities and AI task analysis on this page. They are not adoption rates, measured effects, job-disappearance or personal-unemployment probabilities, or official scores from Stanford or another external institution. No measured time weights or future robot deployment are assumed.
Distinguish tasks that can be assisted (retrieval, organization, drafts) from judgments that engineers must make (standard conformity, safety and failure, design approval).
A tool demonstration does not equal organizational adoption: the object and version must be clear, data sources reliable, and human review and documentation in place.
A displacement rate, layoff timeline, or net job change cannot be derived from task exposure; this page does not give such predictions.
| Work direction | Task | Current changes | Human control points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Requirements and standards | Retrieve standard clauses and manual parameters | Can assist: locate clauses and device parameters and list items to verify. | Return to the original standards and data sheets to check applicable conditions. |
| Solutions and simulation | Organize simulation parameters and results | Can assist: parameter archiving, result comparison, and anomaly flagging. | Engineers confirm model assumptions, boundary conditions, and conclusions. |
| Testing and data | Analyze test data | Can assist: data cleaning, statistics, and deviation flagging. | Keep raw readings and measurement conditions; criteria are confirmed by engineers. |
| Documents and drawings | Draft technical documents and explanations | Can assist: drafts, terminology consistency, and version comparison. | Design documents and approvals are reviewed and signed by an authorized role. |
| Compliance verification | Compare against standard conformity checklists | Not automatically determined: conformity must be verified item by item against standards. | Confirmed by a role with the qualifications and authorization. |
| Safety and failure | Assess failure modes and protection | Not automatically determined: personal and equipment safety is involved. | Confirmed by a qualified role, with evidence retained. |
| Supply chain and substitution | Organize device substitution information | Can assist: summarizing parameters and supply information. | Substitute parts must be re-verified against data sheet conditions. |
Evidence has three layers: technical capability, actual adoption, and job outcomes are judged separately and do not substitute for one another.
The three work directions differ in how their tasks change and which responsibilities are retained.
What AI mainly changesCan assist: standard retrieval, load calculation organization, and document drafts.
Still the responsibility of peopleSystem capacity, protection coordination, and electrical safety responsibility remain with engineers.
What AI mainly changesCan assist: device parameter organization, simulation result comparison, and layout checking.
Still the responsibility of peopleCircuit and device design trade-offs, electromagnetic compatibility, and verification conclusions remain with engineers.
What AI mainly changesCan assist: organizing interface lists and initial screening of change impacts.
Still the responsibility of peopleCross-discipline trade-offs, system-level verification, and approval responsibility remain with the responsible persons.
The order of responsibility from input checking to approval documentation.
Confirm requirements, interfaces, standards, and versions and record items to verify.
Tools are used only for retrieval, organization, and drafts and do not produce approval conclusions.
Parameters return to standards and data sheets and conclusions return to measured evidence, reviewed by engineers.
Record the tool, input, version, and reviewer and keep a traceable basis.
Beyond authorization, stop and hand off to a qualified role, with approval records entering configuration management.
May base the design on inapplicable conditions.
Control method:Control method: return to the original standards and data sheets to check applicable conditions.
May treat unverified conformity as a conclusion.
Control method:Control method: conformity is verified item by item by a qualified role.
May make verification conclusions non-reproducible.
Control method:Control method: keep raw readings, conditions, and uncertainty.
May invalidate verification and affect mass production.
Control method:Control method: update documents per configuration management and check the physical object.
May cause material leaks or rights risk.
Control method:Control method: choose tools and data scope per organizational rules.
First build up math, circuits, and signals fundamentals and use course projects to accumulate verifiable design records.
Make checking standards and data sheets, recording measurement conditions, and documenting changes into habits.
Use tools for retrieval and organization, with specialist indicators still re-checked against standards and measurements.
Define the scope of tool use, review responsibility, and documentation requirements, and retain approval authority.
No occupational adoption, time-savings, or net job change evidence was obtained this round, so tasks are not described as already compressed; retrieval, organization, and drafts are only editorial trial suggestions, and design and approval still require human evidence and authorization.
Source:O*NET OnLine — 17-2071.00 Electrical EngineersOriginal materials ↗
No: parameters must be checked back against the original standards and device data sheets for applicable conditions, with sources and versions retained.
Source:NIST AI RMF 1.0Original materials ↗
Not automatically: conformity must be verified item by item against the applicable standards and confirmed by a role with the qualifications and authorization.
Source:O*NET OnLine — 17-2071.00 Electrical EngineersOriginal materials ↗
Can assist with data cleaning, statistics, and deviation flagging; criteria, measurement conditions, and conclusions are still confirmed by engineers.
Source:O*NET OnLine — 17-2071.00 Electrical EngineersOriginal materials ↗
The object and version are clear, data sources are reliable, and human review and documentation are in place; organizational adoption also requires compliance with its data and compliance rules.
Source:BLS OOH — Electrical and Electronics Engineers (combined 17-2070)Original materials ↗
Task exposure does not equal adoption rate or job outcomes; it must be judged by the sample, indicators, and period of the original research.
Source:O*NET OnLine — 17-2072.00 Electronics Engineers, Except ComputerOriginal materials ↗
Qualitative discussion and quantitative research are kept separate, and since no quantitative evidence of this occupation's adoption rate or job outcomes was obtained, no figures are given.
Source:NIST AI 600-1：Generative AI ProfileOriginal materials ↗
Use tools first for retrieval and drafts, with real parameters, criteria, and approvals still borne by traceable evidence and authorized roles.
Historical case status
| Position or scope | Pay and disclosure situation | Scope of application and gaps |
|---|---|---|
| Entry requirements | Engineering design and R&D positions | Chinese position education, discipline, and experience are checked against the actual employer; no precise national education distribution was obtained this round, so a unified junior college or bachelor's requirement is not generalized. |
| On-the-job training | Design and simulation tools | On-the-job training focuses on design tools, simulation, programmable controllers, and test methods and deepens with the equipment and industry. |
| Safety and authorization | High-voltage and live work | Where high-voltage, live, and stored-energy work is involved, qualifications and authorization are verified per organizational safety rules and work permits. |
| Occupation-level wage framing | National single occupation | Occupation-level wage framing: insufficient evidence, no national single-occupation distribution was obtained. |
If you see a recruitment figure, first check whether it is monthly, annual, hourly, a project total, or a benefits-inclusive framing.
Industry averages are not used to substitute for occupational wages.
Industry averages are not used to substitute for occupational wages.
Differences by position and region are pronounced.
Differences by position and region are pronounced.
Must be checked against the specific position and project.
Must be checked against the specific position.
That AI may assist with design materials and documents is an editorial judgment; there is no Chinese data this round on this occupation's adoption, wages, or causal demand effects, so income is not described as already changed.
| High end | Insufficient evidence: no combined-occupation percentile was obtained this round | Combined 17-2070 90th percentile not obtained | Sub-occupation reference: the 10/50/90 percentiles for electronics 17-2072 are 81,840/130,220/206,960 USD/year (May 2025); these cannot serve as the combined occupation's high end. |
|---|
Pay · combined 17-2070 10th percentile：Insufficient evidence: no combined percentile was obtained this round；Sub-occupation percentiles are listed separately and cannot be stitched together or interpolated.
Pay · combined 17-2070 25th percentile：Insufficient evidence: no combined percentile was obtained this round；Sub-occupation percentiles are listed separately and cannot be stitched together or interpolated.
Pay · median (combined framing 17-2070)：125,040 USD/year (60.12 USD/hour, May 2025)；National median under the combined framing； half of practitioners are below and half above this value.
Pay · combined 17-2070 75th percentile：Insufficient evidence: no combined percentile was obtained this round；Sub-occupation percentiles are listed separately and cannot be stitched together or interpolated.
Pay · combined 17-2070 90th percentile：Insufficient evidence: no combined percentile was obtained this round；Sub-occupation percentiles are listed separately and cannot be stitched together or interpolated.
The statistical subject is U.S. OEWS/OOH May 2025 wages and the 2025—2035 projection; the combined framing covers two sub-occupations.
Cannot be extrapolated to China: Chinese and U.S. occupational framings are not automatically equivalent, and no purchasing power conversion is made.
Individual outcomes cannot be guaranteed: the median is not a starting salary, a percentile is not a seniority level, and openings are not net gains.
When using it, combine sub-occupation direction, industry, region, education, and scope of responsibility, and keep the statistical period and units.
| Industry | Industry annual wage median for the sub-occupation (USD/year) | How to understand |
|---|---|---|
| Electrical 17-2071 · aerospace product and parts manufacturing | 141,160 USD/year (May 2025) | The annual wage median for this sub-occupation within the listed industries, not the combined 17-2070 or the average of all occupations in the industry. |
| Electrical 17-2071 · physical, engineering, and life sciences R&D | 135,230 USD/year (May 2025) | The annual wage median for this sub-occupation within the listed industries, not the combined 17-2070 or the average of all occupations in the industry. |
| Electronics 17-2072 · semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing | 146,700 USD/year (May 2025) | The annual wage median for this sub-occupation within the listed industries, not the combined 17-2070 or the average of all occupations in the industry. |
| Electronics 17-2072 · federal government (except postal) | 135,890 USD/year (May 2025) | The annual wage median for this sub-occupation within the listed industries, not the combined 17-2070 or the average of all occupations in the industry. |
Pay is determined by paid hours and actual arrangements; the standard work year conversion in the statistics is a framing assumption, not an individual's hours.
Specialist direction (electrical／electronic), industry, and scope of responsibility affect pay, and the job title alone should not be used.
Workplace, safety requirements, and travel arrangements vary by position and must be checked against the specific employer.
Combined-framing employment size in 2025, which is not exactly the same population covered by the wage statistics.
Projected change over the period under the combined framing, not an individual's probability of getting a job.
Openings include growth and replacements and are not net new jobs.
O*NET occupational interest baseline
Official interest code RIC; not used for personality diagnosis or hiring decisions.Official interest code RIC (Realistic, Investigative, Conventional): hands-on work with equipment and systems, analysis and troubleshooting by principle, and recording and checking data per standards.
Interests only suggest directions to explore; actual fit is verified through checkable design tasks and review feedback.
Can you link requirements, interfaces, standards, and verification into a traceable chain?
Use checkable design calculations and verification records to check whether requirements — design — testing — change are linked into a chain.
Do not use it this way:Not used for personality diagnosis or hiring conclusions.
Learn about my career interestsCan you maintain version, change, and measurement records over the long term?
Use a design log covering one continuous week to check willingness to maintain parameter, version, and deviation records.
Do not use it this way:Not used for personality diagnosis or hiring conclusions.
Learn about my Big Five traitsWould you rather do design analysis and simulation, or testing and field commissioning?
Preference descriptions are not capability conclusions: use actual design and debugging tasks to observe work preferences.
Do not use it this way:Preference descriptions are not capability conclusions.
Learn about my personality preferencesCan you accept review, revision, and long-cycle project rhythms?
Check against a course project or cooperative education cycle.
Do not use it this way:Not used as a basis for hiring.
Learn about my motivation cuesWhen parameter conflicts or simulation-versus-measured discrepancies appear, can you stop and review?
Use fictional anomaly scenarios to observe their troubleshooting order and escalation approach.
Do not use it this way:Not used for capability scoring.
Learn about my cognitive performanceCan you hand over interfaces and risks clearly with mechanical, software, manufacturing, and suppliers?
Verify handover completeness with interface lists and review records.
Do not use it this way:Not used for a hiring conclusion.
Learn about my communication cuesBetter match:Can you complete reviewed design and verification per requirements and standards?
Note:Do not treat simulation results as measured conclusions.
Better match:Can you correctly use simulation, measurement, and configuration management tools?
Note:Check versions and parameter sources; do not rely on default settings.
Better match:Willing to deepen power systems, protection, and electrical safety calculations.
Note:Design capability and responsibility must be checked by sub-direction; communication ability does not imply fit.
View related occupations:Electrical Engineers (electrical-engineers)Better match:Willing to deepen analog/digital/RF and device verification.
Note:Directional expertise must be added; review and revision alone does not prove electronics employment.
View related occupations:Electronics Engineers, Except Computer (electronics-engineers-except-computer)Better match:Willing to deepen architecture, board-level interfaces, and hardware-software co-design.
Note:Tolerance under milestone pressure does not substitute for hardware system design capability.
View related occupations:Computer Hardware Engineers (computer-hardware-engineers)Better match:Willing to add mechanics of materials, mechanisms, and mechanical design.
Note:Cross-discipline fundamentals are needed; electrical and electronic study habits do not prove mechanical employment.
View related occupations:Mechanical Engineers (mechanical-engineers)Verify with paper design calculation and verification record exercises.
Save raw data and sources in a design log.
Set stop and escalation conditions.
Check applicable standards, criteria, and measurement conditions.
Revise per review records and keep change traces.
Verified per the target position and industry.
Tools cannot replace standard conformity judgments and design approval.
Assess per data sheet conditions and re-verify.
Verify item by item per applicable standards and work permits.
Complete this page's paper exercises, make the two variants, and then review the stop conditions.
Basis：OSHA 29 CFR 1910.147
Typical scenario：Releasing a design without verifying it against applicable electrical safety, electromagnetic compatibility, or product standards.
Main positions：Solution design and compliance verification positions
Possible consequences：Can make the product unmarketable, trigger recalls, or create traceable liability.
Reduce risk：Verify item by item per standards and retain conformity evidence, handing matters beyond qualification scope to a qualified role.
Basis：BLS OOH — Electrical and Electronics Engineers (combined 17-2070)
Typical scenario：Drawings, bills of materials, software configuration, and the physical object on site are at inconsistent versions.
Main positions：Design change and configuration management positions
Possible consequences：Can invalidate verification conclusions and create untraceable differences in mass production and in the field.
Reduce risk：Update documents and configuration per the change process, check the physical object before release, and keep review and approval records.
Basis：BLS OOH — Electrical and Electronics Engineers (combined 17-2070)
Typical scenario：A key device is discontinued, or a substitute's parameters differ from the data sheet conditions.
Main positions：Device selection and procurement collaboration positions
Possible consequences：Can affect derating, lifetime, and electromagnetic performance, making existing verification no longer valid.
Reduce risk：Assess substitute parts per data sheet conditions and re-verify the affected indicators, recording the approval and limitations.
Basis：BLS OOH — Electrical and Electronics Engineers (combined 17-2070)
Typical scenario：Skipping criteria review to meet a milestone, or treating simulation results as measured conclusions.
Main positions：Test verification and quality support positions
Possible consequences：Can let unverified designs enter mass production and amplify safety and quality risk.
Reduce risk：Test item by item per criteria and record measurement conditions and uncertainty, with deviations recorded separately and retested before reporting conclusions.
Basis：BLS OOH — Electrical and Electronics Engineers (combined 17-2070) · O*NET OnLine — 17-2071.00 Electrical Engineers
Typical scenario：Using AI-generated parameters, criteria, or compliance conclusions directly in a design.
Main positions：Design and documentation positions using AI tools
Possible consequences：Can introduce parameters without source support or incorrect compliance judgments.
Reduce risk：AI output is used only for retrieval and drafts; parameters and criteria return to standards, data sheets, and measured evidence for review.
Basis：BLS OOH — Electrical and Electronics Engineers (combined 17-2070) · O*NET OnLine — 17-2071.00 Electrical Engineers
| Entry directions | What you mainly do initially | Employer requirements and observation basis | How to demonstrate ability without experience | Differences from other directions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry in the electrical direction | Completes electrical system calculations, drawing organization, and test records under supervision. | Education and coursework, internship or cooperative education experience, electrical safety awareness. | Use course projects or a paper calculation book to show a checkable design process. | Leans toward power and distribution systems; attention to capacity, protection, and electrical safety responsibility. |
| Entry in the electronics direction | Completes circuit design, simulation, and prototype measurement under supervision. | Circuit and signals coursework, simulation and instrument experience. | Show design judgment through simulation-versus-measured comparison records. | Leans toward circuits and devices; attention to electromagnetic compatibility and device selection. |
| Entry in control and automation | Completes control loop construction, parameter tuning, and commissioning records under supervision. | Control theory, programmable controller, and sensor experience. | Show the troubleshooting process with paper control logic and commissioning records. | Leans toward systems and algorithms; attention to safety interlocks and fail-safe protection. |
| Entry in testing and verification | Executes tests per criteria under supervision and records conditions and results each time. | Measurement methods, instrument use, and data recording standards. | Show rigor with test criteria tables and deviation handling records. | Leans toward verification and quality; attention to uncertainty and retest requirements. |
| Entry in R&D and new product introduction | Takes part in prototype iteration, manufacturability checks, and mass production introduction preparation. | Project collaboration experience and awareness of documentation and change records. | Show cross-discipline communication ability with a change impact analysis. | Leans toward productization and mass production; attention to cost, process, and supply risk. |
Check the discipline, coursework, and education level in the job posting, and record the posting date and whether it is still open.
Check the explicit requirements for simulation, measurement, programmable controller, and configuration management tools, and distinguish “familiar with” from “expert in”.
Check the project type, scope of responsibility, and whether independent design ownership is required, distinguishing participation from ownership.
Check whether electrical safety training, work permits, or compliance experience are required, and record the applicable jurisdiction.
Complete a design statement from fictional requirements, covering requirements, interfaces, solution trade-offs, and assumptions.
Record model assumptions, parameter sources, boundary conditions, and tolerance analysis.
Design a test sheet per fictional criteria, covering measurement conditions, raw readings, and deviation handling.
Simulate one design change and write clearly the impact scope, items to retest, and the approving role.
| Scenario | What to check | How to observe | What cannot be inferred from it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interview | Can they explain requirements, interfaces, standards, and design trade-offs? | Check whether assumptions, boundary conditions, and open items are written clearly. | Where conditions do not match, the employer and the position decide, not the individual. |
| Technical assessment or portfolio review | Can they complete a paper calculation or simulation review per standards and criteria? | Check data sources, units, model assumptions, and deviation handling. | If not passed, they must not independently take on design and approval. |
| Probation and mentorship period | Completes module design and verification under supervision with documentation. | Check participation in reviews, change records, and compliance with safety procedures. | Any overreach or error means immediate stop and retraining. |
| Independent responsibility period | Independently completes module design and delivers per process. | Check compliance verification, review, and configuration management records. | Safety or compliance overreach is handled per organizational rules. |
| Qualification / preparation item | Who it mainly suits | Practical value in job seeking | Whether it is a common entry requirement | Application / processing conditions | Investment considerations | Important limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bachelor's degree (in a related engineering field) | Most entry-level position candidates | Yes: in the O*NET survey, more than eight in ten responses for both sub-occupations required a bachelor's | A typical U.S. entry point, not a unified statutory condition for all positions; check the actual employer and jurisdiction. | Apply per the institution's and program's accreditation requirements | Four years of study plus tuition and project and internship investment | A degree is not the same as a practice qualification or technical approval authority |
| Associate's degree plus experience | Some technical or manufacturing positions | Depends on the position: can serve as a supplementary path | No: it is not a common requirement | Weighed by institutional and employer recognition | Two years of study plus on-the-job training investment | Requires additional evidence of design capability and responsibility level |
| Master's or doctoral degree | R&D, algorithm, or research positions | Depends on the position: required for some R&D roles | No: it is not a common requirement | Apply based on the research direction and supervisor resources | Two to five years of research and publication investment | An education level is not the same as a position's technical approval authority |
| Professional Engineer (PE) license | Positions that provide engineering services externally or sign documents | Depends on the position and jurisdiction: required for some roles | No: verified per jurisdiction and position | Requires passing an examination and meeting experience-year requirements | Examination, experience years, and maintenance costs | Valid only within its applicable jurisdiction and scope of business |
| Employer internal design approval authorization | Positions holding design and change approval responsibility | Yes: internal organizational authorization | Internal authorization to perform duties must be checked; it is not a national qualification certificate and does not mean approval authority is unnecessary. | Granted per organizational rules and review records | Internal training and responsibility-period investment | Cannot be inferred from a job title or personal assumption |
| Electrical safety and work permits | Positions involving high-voltage, live, and stored-energy work | Yes: carried out as required when electrical work is involved | Yes: verified per organizational safety rules and the jurisdiction | Handled per work permit and training requirements | Training, refresher training, and protective measures investment | It is a work authorization, not the same as design or approval qualification |
Gives requirement versions, interface definitions, and constraints as exercise input.
Exercise output: list assumptions, boundary conditions, and open items.
Gives key parameters, rated conditions, and derating requirements for checking.
Exercise output: write the parameter sources and assumptions for derating and tolerance calculations.
Gives per-reading values and measurement conditions, including one out-of-range value and one missing condition.
Exercise output: mark the out-of-range item and the missing-condition item and write the retest requirements.
Lists the reference deliverables and the scope that must not be exceeded (no real live or high-voltage work involved).
Copy one applicable standard clause and write its scope of application and uncertain points.
Use fictional requirements to organize interfaces and constraints and flag assumptions and open items.
Complete derating and tolerance calculations per the device excerpt and record parameter sources.
Write pass criteria, measurement conditions, and how uncertainty is handled.
Record readings each time from the fictional data sheet and mark out-of-range and missing-condition items.
Change device derating and test criteria respectively and write clearly the impact scope and items to retest.
Summarize the conditions under which you must stop and escalate, producing a one-page review record.
Typical duties：Completes calculations, simulation, and drawing organization under senior engineer guidance.
Promotion evidence：Reproducible calculation books and simulation records, and mentorship comments.
Qualification boundaries：Verified per work location and employer.
Next step：Independently completes routine module design and is subject to review.
Typical duties：Independently takes on the design and verification of a single module or subsystem.
Promotion evidence：Module test reports, review records, and change orders.
Qualification boundaries：Verified per work location and employer.
Next step：Takes on cross-module interface definitions.
Typical duties：Responsible for subsystem interfaces, trade-offs, and system-level verification.
Promotion evidence：System-level verification reports and compliance evidence.
Qualification boundaries：Verified per work location and employer.
Next step：Takes on system-level technical decisions and reviews.
Typical duties：Leads technical solutions, reviews, and risk decisions.
Promotion evidence：Solution review records and project technical conclusions.
Qualification boundaries：Verified per work location and employer.
Next step：Check the next level's responsibility and authorization boundaries.
Typical duties：Go deep in one direction: power, control, RF, analog, digital, or embedded.
Promotion evidence：Course, project, or portfolio evidence for that direction.
Qualification boundaries：Verified per work location and employer.
Next step：Add the direction's specialist tools and methods.
Typical duties：Takes on key design, simulation, and device selection in that direction.
Promotion evidence：Specialist design statements and measured-comparison records.
Qualification boundaries：Verified per work location and employer.
Next step：Review specialist indicators and failure modes.
Typical duties：Completes verification, compliance checking, and problem closure for that direction per standards.
Promotion evidence：Conformity evidence, deviation handling, and retest records.
Qualification boundaries：Verified per work location and employer.
Next step：Takes on responsibility for compliance and verification conclusions.
Typical duties：Arrange design, testing, and supplier tasks within authorization.
Promotion evidence：A plan with clear boundaries and responsible persons.
Qualification boundaries：Verified per work location and employer.
Next step：Check delivery and documentation.
Typical duties：Organize design and verification reviews and track problem closure.
Promotion evidence：Review records and problem lists.
Qualification boundaries：Verified per work location and employer.
Next step：Handle exceptions and disputes.
Typical duties：Set stop conditions and report compliance risk.
Promotion evidence：Risk ledger and escalation records.
Qualification boundaries：Verified per work location and employer.
Next step：Keep the basis for decisions.
Confirm that requirements, interfaces, standards, and the physical object versions are consistent.
Complete simulation, calculation, and testing and record conditions each time.
Isolate deviations per process, retest, and submit changes.
Verify compliance within authorization and hand off for approval.
United States · O*NET-SOC 17-2070 (combined framing)
About 297,900
Employment size
Employment size and job openings are not the same indicator.
Cannot show：Cannot serve as a personal employment guarantee.
United States · O*NET-SOC 17-2070 (combined framing)
About 16,300 per year
Annual job openings
Openings include growth and replacements and are not net new jobs.
Cannot show：Cannot serve as a personal employment guarantee.
These are ability adjacency relationships and do not represent automatic promotion or exemption from further study.
Transferable：Circuit and device fundamentals, testing and measurement, and design documentation standards.
Needs to be filled in：Requires added specialist depth and design responsibility in RF, analog, or high-speed digital design.
View occupation detailsTransferable：Electrical principles, power equipment, and system commissioning experience.
Needs to be filled in：Requires added power system calculations, protection, and electrical safety responsibility.
View occupation detailsTransferable：Digital circuits, interfaces, and debugging experience.
Needs to be filled in：Requires added computer architecture, board-level design, and low-level software co-design.
View occupation detailsTransferable：Engineering drawings, tolerances, and system integration experience.
Needs to be filled in：Requires added mechanics of materials, mechanisms, and mechanical design fundamentals.
View occupation detailsTransferable：Control systems, sensors, and actuator commissioning experience.
Needs to be filled in：Requires added control algorithms and cross-discipline system integration responsibility.
View occupation detailsTransferable：Electrical and electronic drawing and document standards, and version and change awareness.
Needs to be filled in：Requires added drafting standards and CAD file management specialization.
View occupation detailsTransferable：Test equipment operation, measurement records, and maintenance and troubleshooting experience.
Needs to be filled in：Engineers moving to technician roles need to match field equipment, assembly and testing, and maintenance skills plus position authorization; they do not necessarily still need added higher theory or degrees, and duties and pay are checked separately.
View occupation detailsTransferable：Awareness of version and document consistency.
Needs to be filled in：Moving to drafting requires added CAD, symbols, annotations, and drawing management; design analysis does not equal proficiency in drafting delivery, and sealing authority is checked separately.
View occupation detailsThis occupation carries design, analysis, and technical approval responsibility, and the typical U.S. entry point is a bachelor's degree; technologists and technicians (17-3023) focus on implementation, assembly, testing, maintenance, and recording support and typically work under the guidance of engineering staff.
U.S. O*NET-SOC 17-2070 is an official combined framing covering 17-2071 Electrical Engineers and 17-2072 Electronics Engineers (except computer); employment, growth, and openings use the combined figures, while wage percentiles use the two sub-occupations' figures with the scope labeled in each case.
BLS OOH shows a May 2025 combined-framing median annual wage of 125,040 USD (60.12 USD/hour); the percentiles come from the sub-occupations: electrical engineers 76,550—184,300 USD, and electronics engineers (except computer) 81,840—206,960 USD.
BLS OOH shows about 297,900 in the combined framing in 2025, a projected 8% increase over 2025—2035 (much faster than average), an employment change of about +23,400, and about 16,300 annual openings; openings include growth and replacements.
The National Bureau of Statistics materials checked here reach only industry and broad personnel-category framing and do not provide a national occupational wage distribution precisely corresponding to 17-2070; this page registers insufficient evidence accordingly and does not substitute industry averages or a single recruitment quote.
The typical U.S. entry point is a bachelor's degree in a related engineering field, and employers value internships and cooperative education; Mainland China education and qualification requirements are checked item by item against the target employer's job postings and competent authority rules, and this page obtained no nationally unified conditions that can be cited externally, nor can U.S. framing be used to infer Mainland China conditions.
AI and automation tools can assist with manual and standard retrieval, simulation parameter organization, test data analysis, and document drafts; they cannot replace standard conformity judgments, safety and failure analysis, measurement condition confirmation, and design approval.
High-voltage and stored-energy equipment, live commissioning, mechanical and thermal hazards, and the compliance consequences of design defects are all borne by roles with the qualifications and authorization; paper exercises and simulation cannot replace field work permits, isolation, and acceptance.
Judge by observable behavior: whether you can consistently check requirements and versions, keep measurement conditions and deviations, accept review and revise, and stop and escalate when conditions or authorization are unclear. The interest code RIC is used only to explore directions.
FermatMind research workflow
May 2025 wage data; 2025—2035 projection
BLS OOH — Electrical and Electronics Engineers (combined 17-2070)
Limitations of use：Supports only the editorial summary of adjacent capability, and does not represent automatic promotion or exemption from further study.
Limitations of use：Does not carry this occupation's wage or demand figures.
Limitations of use：The entry page does not carry this occupation's figures.
Limitations of use：Applies only to the U.S. combined framing; the median is not a starting salary, and openings are not net gains.
Limitations of use：The entry page does not carry occupational wage figures.
Limitations of use：Does not carry this occupation's adoption rate or job outcome data.
Limitations of use：Applies only to the adjacent occupation, used to explain direction differences.
Limitations of use：Applies only to the adjacent occupation, used to explain direction differences.
Limitations of use：Applies only to the adjacent occupation, used to explain direction differences.
Limitations of use：Applies only to the adjacent occupation, used to explain responsibility differences.
Limitations of use：The entry page does not carry occupation-level wage distributions.
Limitations of use：Interest results are not used for capability or hiring conclusions.
Limitations of use：Cannot substitute for occupation-level wages; used only to explain framing boundaries.
Limitations of use：International materials do not provide this occupation's adoption or displacement rate data.
Limitations of use：Explains statistical methods and does not substitute for specific occupational figures.
Limitations of use：Applies only to that sub-occupation and does not represent the combined framing or Chinese positions.
Limitations of use：Does not provide this occupation's adoption rate or job change data.
Limitations of use：Applies only to that sub-occupation; a percentile is not a seniority level.
Limitations of use：Applies only to the U.S. combined framing; does not represent Mainland China education requirements.
Limitations of use：Method descriptions do not substitute for specific occupational figures.
Limitations of use：Does not substitute for a specific country's or employer's work permits and standards.
Limitations of use：Applies only to that sub-occupation and does not represent the combined framing or Chinese positions.
Limitations of use：Applies only to that sub-occupation; a percentile is not a seniority level.
Limitations of use：Applies only to the adjacent occupation, used to explain delivery differences.
Limitations of use：Not engineering safety standards, occupational adoption, or causal effects.
Limitations of use：Not engineer adoption rate, displacement rate, or incident rate.
Limitations of use：Exclusions and exceptions exist; not a procedure for all electrical commissioning.
Source scope, limitations, and statistical periods are checked separately against the original evidence: U.S. wages are May 2025 and the outlook is 2025—2035; Mainland China figures are industry and broad personnel-category framing, with no precise occupational percentile obtained. Education, discipline, experience, and any relaxation relationships in a job posting must be read item by item; one relaxable item does not mean other conditions can be substituted. The paper exercises and simulation on this page are for career exploration only and do not constitute practice, design approval, work permits, or safety authorization. Judgments involving high voltage, live work, stored energy, and field work may only be made by trained and authorized roles under the applicable rules.
Test whether my career interests suit Electrical and Electronics Engineers · Learn about my Big Five traits · Learn about my personality type · Learn about my career anchors
When a device is substituted or verification fails, record the impact and re-verify, with approval borne by an authorized role.
Maintain changes, reviews, drawings, and bills of materials and deliver per authorization.
Typical duties：Provides technical judgment and guidance in that direction.
Promotion evidence：Technical review records and internal and external technical conclusions.
Qualification boundaries：Verified per work location and employer.
Next step：Re-confirm authorization before expanding responsibility.
Typical duties：Take on technical approval and responsibility governance per rules.
Promotion evidence：Approval records and the evidence chain.
Qualification boundaries：Verified per work location and employer.
Next step：Develop toward technical management.
Limitations of use：Editorial ratings use the existing occupational responsibilities and AI task analysis on this page. They are not adoption rates, measured effects, job-disappearance or personal-unemployment probabilities, or official scores from Stanford or another external institution. No measured time weights or future robot deployment are assumed.
