Loading page content
Preparing content…
SOC 13-1131
Occupational definition | O*NET-SOC13-1131.00 Fundraisers organize activities to raise funds, monetary donations or other gifts for organizations, and may design promotional materials explaining the organization's work, goals and funding needs. The 28 tasks include donor relationships/pledges, cash/in-kind sponsorships, databases/acknowledgments, strategies/plans, grant applications, donor/investor research, staff/volunteer supervision, targets/progress, recruitment/outreach, community promotion, reports/presentations, explaining donation tax benefits, publicity/speeches/press releases, budget/cost monitoring, special/online campaigns, speaker invitations, corporate matching, logistics, media contacts and event materials. Management, strategy, events and tax explanations are official tasks and cannot be excluded categorically. Verify personal authority and jurisdictional procedures separately.
Model impact index for three equally weighted representative core tasks; not a measured share of working time or a job-loss probability. floor((75+75+25)/3+0.5)=58; fermatmind-ai-impact-v1; 2026-10-18.
Exploration method | Independently use G/V2 below to check receipts, pledges, goods and restrictions, recalculate and draft communications, preserving original errors/proposed corrections. Artifacts support task exploration, not personality diagnosis, qualifications or organizational authorization. No real donors, institutional materials or experienced person's sign-off needed.
Tradeoff suggestions | 81% select a typical workweek over 40 hours, 43% decision outcomes important, 43% pressure at least monthly but not weekly, 33% accuracy extremely important, 48% moderate responsibility for others' results and 57% moderate competition. These describe respondents' occupations, not individual health effects, fundraising-season causality or violation frequencies. Observe recordkeeping/communication in fictional exercises.
Work context | O*NET respondents: 100% daily email/face-to-face, 95% daily telephone, 67% external public extremely important and continual contact, 60% teamwork extremely important, 57% considerable task-priority freedom. 62% public speaking at least monthly but not weekly does not mean everyone speaks a fixed monthly number. Editorial exercises may observe listening, information grounds and commitment records, not predict personal fit from percentages.
Occupational definition | O*NET-SOC13-1131.00 Fundraisers organize activities to raise funds, monetary donations or other gifts for organizations, and may design promotional materials explaining the organization's work, goals and funding needs. The 28 tasks include donor relationships/pledges, cash/in-kind sponsorships, databases/acknowledgments, strategies/plans, grant applications, donor/investor research, staff/volunteer supervision, targets/progress, recruitment/outreach, community promotion, reports/presentations, explaining donation tax benefits, publicity/speeches/press releases, budget/cost monitoring, special/online campaigns, speaker invitations, corporate matching, logistics, media contacts and event materials. Management, strategy, events and tax explanations are official tasks and cannot be excluded categorically. Verify personal authority and jurisdictional procedures separately.
Career direction comparison
Introduction | Four columns compare directions, core work/outputs, key differences and choices each may suit. Fundraising, communication, marketing/events often connect within an organization but are not interchangeable. Relearn processes, law and authority for transitions.
| Career direction | Core work/outputs | Key differences | Choices it may suit better |
|---|---|---|---|
| This occupation: Fundraisers | Core work/outputs: Donor research/segmentation, strategies/events/targets, messages/materials/cadence, solicitation/pledges/records, thanks/disclosure/cost-conversion reviews. Outputs include plans, briefs, pledge/restriction fields, thank-you templates and review records. | Key difference | Fundraising centers on donation resources and includes strategy, supervision, budgets, events/communication. Neighbors are compared by management, research, events, PR/marketing emphasis; donation communication/disclosure may be shared. Verify powers separately. | May better suit people who listen first in frequent external communication, turn missions into verifiable donation requests and accept rejection/deadline pressure. |
AI occupational impacts
Insufficient evidence: Quantified occupational generative-AI exposure, adoption and job causality unavailable. No medium/high ratings or promised acceleration. Based on 28 tasks, editorial trials may include public research, drafts, deduplication/statistics. Check permissions, versions/results against originals; judge feasibility, adoption/employment separately. AI Impact Score 58% is an editorial estimate. Model impact index for three equally weighted representative core tasks; not a measured share of working time or a job-loss probability. floor((75+75+25)/3+0.5)=58; fermatmind-ai-impact-v1; 2026-10-18.The three tasks, ratings and sources are listed in the FermatMind method source record on this page.
FermatMind AI Impact Score estimation method v1
FermatMind / 费马测试 · 2026-10-18
Editorial ratings use the existing occupational responsibilities and AI task analysis on this page. They are not adoption rates, measured effects, job-disappearance or personal-unemployment probabilities, or official scores from Stanford or another external institution. No measured time weights or future robot deployment are assumed.
Mainland China pay reference
Insufficient evidence: Chinese classification correspondence to US 13-1131 absent. Chinese title/search aliases are not code mappings. Charity Law separates public-fundraising organizational qualification/targeted fundraising, not personal certificates.
Occupational definition | O*NET-SOC13-1131.00 Fundraisers organize activities to raise funds, monetary donations or other gifts for organizations, and may design promotional materials explaining the organization's work, goals and funding needs. The 28 tasks include donor relationships/pledges, cash/in-kind sponsorships, databases/acknowledgments, strategies/plans, grant applications, donor/investor research, staff/volunteer supervision, targets/progress, recruitment/outreach, community promotion, reports/presentations, explaining donation tax benefits, publicity/speeches/press releases, budget/cost monitoring, special/online campaigns, speaker invitations, corporate matching, logistics, media contacts and event materials. Management, strategy, events and tax explanations are official tasks and cannot be excluded categorically. Verify personal authority and jurisdictional procedures separately.
US pay reference
Direct answer | US 13-1131 | 2025 annual percentiles US$46,630 / 57,480 / 72,550 / 92,180 / 115,820; hourly US$22.42 / 27.63 / 34.88 / 44.32 / 55.68. Median is not starting pay; cutoff ratio about 2.5 does not establish seniority/regional causes. OEWS2025 | US 13-1131 full-time/part-time employee pretax regular-hours pay, excluding self-employment. Includes base, piece rates, commissions, production bonuses, cost-of-living/hazard pay; excludes overtime premiums, shift differentials, nonproduction bonuses/benefits. Do not exclude all performance pay, commissions/allowances. Annual usually hourly ×2080, not personal hours/take-home pay.
| Wage-statistics position | Annual wage reference | Conversion boundaries | Understanding this position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lowest 10% | 10th percentile US$46,630/year (2025, BLS OEWS) | Official annual pay, not personal monthly income | 10th percentile is a national cutoff, not evidence of graduate/support/narrow-duty roles. |
| Median (50%) | Median hourly US$34.88 / annual US$72,550 (2025, BLS OEWS and OOH) |
Career fit guide
Direct answer | Tests do not replace task evidence. Independently recalculate G/V2 receipts, correct errors/draft communication, observing records/explanations. Artifacts are not qualifications/real fundraising; no volunteering or sign-off required.
You may fit better： Fit signals: Listen first in frequent external communication, translate missions into verifiable requests, record pledges/restrictions checkably and accept rejection/deadlines.
Situations requiring caution： Caution signals: Difficulty sustaining frequent external communication, rejection/fundraising-season pressure or marked discomfort with restriction/data/disclosure details.
Try an entry exercise： Editorial exploration | Use fictional G/V2 to observe segmentation, expression grounds and pledge/restriction records, then check actual organizations. Simulation does not establish competence/long-term fit.
Pressures, risks/professional boundaries
Editorial risks | Identify excessive commitments, unverified qualifications/filings, missing restrictions, unauthorized data sending, broken records/conflicts. Scenarios establish no frequencies, penalties/health conclusions. Budget/tax explanations are official; verify jurisdiction/powers, escalate unauthorized matters through valid procedures.
Evidence scope | O*NET frequencies/BLS tasks support context, not accident rates. 43% pressure and 62% speeches at least monthly but not weekly. Chinese Charity Law/PIPL scope in register; verify cases separately.
Typical scenarios：Scenario | Oral promises of deductible receipts/designated uses secure a gift but cannot be honored; donor later demands explanation.
Main roles：Fundraisers/supervisors; organizations/donors
Possible consequences：Unauthorized promises of uses/returns or guaranteed tax deductibility/creditability; misunderstandings/disputes, reputational damage/compliance/tax risks
Entry, qualifications/career development
Editorial path | Try G/V2, then check organizations. BLS typical bachelor's/possible experience preferences are not uniform Chinese requirements. Relationships, applications, event data/coordination are exploration, not mandatory ladders/promises. Verify jurisdictional authority; do not exclude strategy, management/tax tasks.
Outlook/related transitions
Insufficient evidence: Exact mainland occupational wages/employment absent; not proof of no national statistics. US BLS13-1131 | 2025 employment 140.9 thousand, 2035 projected 148.7 thousand; EP growth 5.5%, net 7.8 thousand, annual openings 10.0 thousand, self-employment 0.5%. OOH rounds to 6%; same 2025—2035 period, no conflict. EP includes self-employment; openings growth/replacement, not recruitment/ten-year net increase. US 13-1131 | 2025 annual percentiles US$46,630 / 57,480 / 72,550 / 92,180 / 115,820; hourly 22.42 / 27.63 / 34.88 / 44.32 / 55.68. Median not starting pay; ratio about 2.5 does not establish seniority/regional causes.
United States · Exact O*NET-SOC 13-1131.00 (BLS OOH)
US BLS13-1131 | Employment 140.9 thousand in 2025, projected 148.7 thousand in 2035; EP growth 5.5%, net increase 7.8 thousand, annual openings 10.0 thousand, self-employment 0.5%. OOH rounds to a whole 6%; both cover 2025—2035 without conflict. EP includes self-employment; openings include growth/replacement, not recruitment or ten-year net growth.
Employment size, growth/openings
Occupational definition | O*NET-SOC13-1131.00 Fundraisers organize activities to raise funds, monetary donations or other gifts for organizations, and may design promotional materials explaining the organization's work, goals and funding needs. The 28 tasks include donor relationships/pledges, cash/in-kind sponsorships, databases/acknowledgments, strategies/plans, grant applications, donor/investor research, staff/volunteer supervision, targets/progress, recruitment/outreach, community promotion, reports/presentations, explaining donation tax benefits, publicity/speeches/press releases, budget/cost monitoring, special/online campaigns, speaker invitations, corporate matching, logistics, media contacts and event materials. Management, strategy, events and tax explanations are official tasks and cannot be excluded categorically. Verify personal authority and jurisdictional procedures separately.
Choose a real task from this page for a small practice project or a conversation with someone in the field. Use the planning guides to set a date, an output and feedback questions before deciding whether to continue.
Editorial checklist | Generates task-exploration questions, not hiring scores. This asset's fixed Chinese title is Fundraisers, exact O*NET-SOC13-1131.00 Fundraisers. The 28 tasks include relationships, strategy, events, supervision, budgets and tax-benefit explanations; verify personal authority separately.
G/V2 entirely fictional paper fundraising exercise | Organization O's school-supplies project requires project-available cash ≥15,000 yuan this round, including equality. No real organization/fundraising is involved. Current D1 records: A received 6,000 yuan unrestricted; B received 4,000 yuan restricted to school supplies for this project; C pledged 5,000 yuan unrestricted but unpaid; D gave 100 books valued at 2,000 yuan in the exercise, not cash; E explicitly refused this contact, with no real identity. Fixed fundraising costs of 500 yuan have been paid from A's cash. Other expenses are unspecified; do not fill 0. D2 draft incorrectly records B as 400 yuan received; retain the original. D3 draft combines receipts, pledges and goods into 17,000 yuan cash and declares the target met. Matching draft M: only subsequent newly received unrestricted cash qualifies for 1:1 matching, capped at 4,000 yuan. Existing A/B, unpaid C and goods D are excluded from the matching base. The draft is unconfirmed and no matching funds have arrived. Scenario R: if subsequent unrestricted cash of 3,000 yuan arrives, the draft is confirmed and all matching funds arrive, calculate scenario project cash; do not treat this as current reality. Q suspends real contact, solicitation, external sending, receipts/payments and publication and remains effective. Tool V1 claims all 17,000 yuan arrived, A may count again for matching and E may be contacted directly; check against D1/M/Q. 90 minutes | 15 minutes label material versions and received/pledged/in-kind/restricted/unknown status; 10 define target/fields; 20 independently recalculate current/R values and correct D2/D3; 15 write one unsent personal and one corporate draft; 20 handoff and V1 reflection; 10 review totals, units, equality, restrictions and suspension. Four outputs: requirements matrix, recalculation/correction record, handoff including two communication drafts, and tool reflection.
Direct answer | An editorial view groups work into relationship research, strategy/events and records/acknowledgments. Official 28 tasks also include staff supervision, budgets, tax-benefit explanations, corporate matching and event logistics. Three groups do not exclude duties. Verify actual organization/jurisdiction authority; titles do not carry neighboring-role powers.
Relationships | Check mission, prospects and grounds. Research/segmentation involve assumptions; verify personal-data authority separately.
Events | Check targets, strategy, people and costs. Includes supervision/tax explanations; verify authority separately.
Editorial comparison | Compare Fundraisers, fundraising managers, market research, event planning, PR and marketing by emphasis. This occupation officially includes strategy, team supervision, events, media lists and budgets; do not allocate these entirely to neighbors. Verify actual organization/jurisdiction powers. Different titles/outputs do not mean mutually exclusive tasks.
| Dimension | Main direction | Comparison direction |
|---|---|---|
| Core purpose | Core purpose | Convert mission/funding needs into executable fundraising plans/events within authority/compliance: identify/maintain donor relationships, design strategies/messages, solicit pledges, record/thank/review, making results measurable and lawful. | Neighboring core ideas | Related roles often seek organizational resources or effective information reach. Differences are stages/outputs: relationships/solicitation, market insights, event execution/logistics, media/public relations or brands/marketing mixes. |
| Main subjects/grounds | Main subjects/bases | Donors/prospects, gifts/sponsorships, materials/databases; using mission/funding needs, plans/budgets, donation restrictions, tax/charity/personal-data law and organizational authorization/approvals. | Neighboring subjects/bases | Managers use strategy/budgets/team capacity; market researchers market/consumer data and study design; event planners venues/suppliers/execution/safety; PR specialists media/communication plans/public opinion; marketing managers positioning/budgets/channel data. |
| Core process | Core process | Break down mission/funding needs; research/segment prospects; design strategies/events/targets; design messages/materials/cadence; solicit/record pledges; thank/disclose and review budgets/progress. Every step must be recorded and reviewable by supervisors, finance and compliance. | Neighboring processes | Managers emphasize strategy, teams, budgets/performance; researchers data/insights/reports; event planners venues, suppliers, agendas, execution/settlement; PR specialists media, copy, events/crisis response; marketing managers brands, marketing mixes, channels/evaluation. |
| Main outputs | Main outputs | Fundraising plans, campaign briefs/goals, research/segmentation grounds, messages/contact cadence, applications/promotional/speech materials, pledge/restriction fields, thank-you templates, donor databases, disclosures and cost/conversion review records. | Neighboring outputs | Manager strategies/budgets/teams, research insights, event plans/execution, PR media communications and marketing brands/channels are editorial examples. Tasks may overlap; verify duties/authority separately. |
| Responsible parties | Authority boundaries | Official tasks include supervision, budgets and explaining donation tax benefits. Verify research, solicitation, commitments, disclosure and processing under valid jurisdictional procedures/job authorization. Escalate excess scope/insufficient grounds promptly. Neither exclude these tasks nor grant personal qualifications from lists. | Neighboring accountability | Usually defined by organizations, professional principles, industry norms and regulations, mainly toward organizations, donors and regulators. |
| Authority/approval | Authority boundaries | Official tasks include supervision, budgets and explaining donation tax benefits. Verify research, solicitation, commitments, disclosure and processing under valid jurisdictional procedures/job authorization. Escalate excess scope/insufficient grounds promptly. Neither exclude these tasks nor grant personal qualifications from lists. | Authority checks | Neighbors may also receive fundraising, budget or compliance powers. Titles do not establish absence of powers. Check written duties, jurisdiction, contracts and authorization; leave unverified items unfilled. |
| Conclusion boundaries | Authority boundaries | Official tasks include supervision, budgets and explaining donation tax benefits. Verify research, solicitation, commitments, disclosure and processing under valid jurisdictional procedures/job authorization. Escalate excess scope/insufficient grounds promptly. Neither exclude these tasks nor grant personal qualifications from lists. | Neighboring conclusion limits | Conclusions often concern business, communication/execution, not determinations of charity, tax or legal liability. Cross-organization/jurisdiction application has limits. |
Identify and build prospect relationships, research goals/net worth/giving history, segment audiences and maintain long-term contact/communication records.
Develop fundraising strategies/event plans, set participation/giving goals, advance annual giving/direct mail and monitor progress.
Solicit cash/in-kind donations and sponsorship from individual, corporate or government donors; obtain and confirm participation/giving pledges in writing.
Write applications to grantmaking bodies and promotional materials, speeches/press releases, explaining organizational goals/funding needs publicly.
Build/update donor databases, send thank-you letters and retain written disclosures/materials under organizational processes.
Monitor budgets, costs and financial data; check donation restrictions, tax/compliance requirements; process personal data/public information under authority.
Pre-employment notes | Check six items individually before applying/joining; titles/promotions do not establish duties/powers. Use written vacancies, contracts, descriptions/policies and continue confirming after joining. Directions only, not formal institutional requirements.
Verification notes | Similar titles differ: individual/annual giving, institutional/foundation applications or events/sponsorship. Disclosure, commitment and budget powers also differ.
Data checks | Identifiable names, contacts and amounts require lawful grounds, purpose/permissions/retention checks. Assess legal sensitivity under PIPL Article 28, not categorically. Verify organizational fundraising qualifications and job authority separately.
Education levels | O*NET required-new-hire survey: 90% bachelor's, 5% post-baccalaureate certificate, 5% master's, not education distribution. Zone4SVP7 to less than 8 is preparation level, not personal required years. BLS typical bachelor's, no related experience/no OJT. OOH says fields may include communication, business or social science; employers may prefer relevant internships/volunteering, not universally require them. Specific Chinese conditions unverified.
| Fundraising Managers | Core work/outputs: Strategies/annual plans, teams/volunteers/budgets/performance, key donors/major-project negotiations. Outputs are strategies, budgets, team performance/project evaluation. | Key difference | Managers emphasize organization-wide coordination editorially. Fundraisers officially also handle strategy, targets, staff/budget supervision; actual work may overlap, beyond only executing predefined strategies. | May better suit people focused on strategy, teams/budgets who can assume management responsibility and overall fundraising pressure. This occupation focuses more on frontline relationships, solicitation/records. |
|---|
| Market Research Analysts and Marketing Specialists (Market Research Analysts) | Core work/outputs: Research design, data collection/analysis, market/competitor/consumer insights, forecasts/reports/recommendations. Outputs are research reports, insights/forecasts. | Key difference: Market researchers center on data/research design, producing market/consumer insights/forecasts. Fundraisers produce donor relationships, solicitation, pledges/records. They may share research methods/data but address different conclusions. | May better suit people focused on surveys, data/statistics/insights who prefer research/reports. Fundraisers focus more on one-to-many communication, relationships/pledge follow-up. |
|---|
| Meeting, Convention, and Event Planners | Core work/outputs: Event plans, venues, suppliers/agendas, execution/safety/settlement and attendance/satisfaction evaluation. Outputs are plans, execution/settlement records. | Key difference: Event planners own venues, suppliers, agendas, execution/settlement, producing events themselves. Fundraisers use events as one channel, producing donor relationships, pledges/gift records. | May better suit people focused on event planning, suppliers, execution/budget control who prefer project coordination. Fundraisers focus more on relationships, solicitation/pledges. |
|---|
| Public Relations Specialists | Core work/outputs: Media relations, press releases/plans, events/publication/public-opinion monitoring/response, brand/public communication. Outputs are copy, media relationships/public-opinion reports. | Key difference: PR specialists maintain reputation/relationships with media/public, producing communication/public-opinion outcomes. Fundraisers obtain donor resources, producing pledges/gift records. Both interface closely in institutional communication. | May better suit people focused on media, copy/crisis response who prefer communication/writing. Fundraisers emphasize one-to-one relationships/resource solicitation. |
|---|
| Marketing Managers | Core work/outputs: Brand/market positioning, marketing mix/channel/placement plans, budgets, evaluation and team management. Outputs are brand/marketing solutions, placement and effectiveness reports. | Key difference | Marketing often centers on products/services/customers; fundraising on donation resources. Channel management may overlap. Verify jurisdiction/organizational powers separately; titles do not imply mutual exclusion. | May better suit people focused on brands, marketing mixes, placement/analysis who can manage budgets/teams. Fundraisers emphasize donor relationships, pledges/compliant disclosure. |
|---|
Comparison conclusion | Explore task emphases. Official tasks include strategy, management, events, media/tax explanations and may overlap neighbors. Verify organizational/jurisdictional powers, not infer them from titles.
Exploration transition | Use G/V2 paper materials to compare research, expression, events and records, then check target organizations. Interest tests generate questions only; artifacts do not establish hiring, management powers or promotion.
Technical feasibility: Tools may reach tasks technically; this means feasibility, not permitted use or organizational adoption.
Organizational adoption depends on organizational, charity, tax/data procedures. Tools do not transfer disclosure, commitment/data-protection responsibility.
Insufficient evidence: Specific Chinese organizational AI adoption/employment results absent. BLS forecasts do not prove AI causes; comparable task adoption/employment evidence is needed. Invent no donation-volume/project-cycle effects.
| Work direction | Task | Current changes | Human control points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research prospects' goals, net worth/giving history; segment audiences | Donor research/segmentation | Public research/categorization may assist; people judge | Fundraisers/supervisors segment/prioritize |
| Set fundraising targets/design events/channels from funding needs | Strategy/event design | Templates/statistics may assist; people decide | Fundraisers/supervisors decide goals/solutions |
| Write applications, publicity, speeches/press releases | Message/material writing | Drafts/version comparisons may assist; people own publication | Authorized people check external statements |
| Solicit individual, corporate/government donors and obtain pledges | Solicitation/pledge acquisition | Cadence/records may assist; people own commitments | Authorized fundraisers solicit/obtain pledges |
| Update donor databases, thank/disclose under processes | Records, thanks/disclosure | Organization/thank-you drafts may assist; people confirm | Authorized people handle disclosure/consideration |
| Monitor budgets, costs/progress; review conversion | Budget, cost/progress monitoring | Statistics/charts may assist; people decide | Check budgets/costs under valid job powers; official tasks include budget supervision. |
| Coordinate events, sponsorship, volunteers/materials | Event, sponsorship/volunteer coordination | Schedules/material lists may assist; people execute | Leads confirm on-site/sponsorship terms |
Evidence boundaries | O*NET describes tasks, not automation risk; BLS wages/employment, not AI causality; ILO topic is not specific occupational research; NIST is general governance. Separate editorial trials from findings; source counts do not replace evidence.
Editorial comparison | Research, drafts, deduplication/statistics are trial uses. No quantified efficiency/adoption evidence or guaranteed acceleration/permanent non-replaceability. Verify organizational/jurisdictional responsibility and compare output to originals.
What AI mainly changesPublic research, categorization/deduplication are trial uses; efficiency unverified
What people remain responsible forDonor contact priorities, personalized statements/final sending
What AI mainly changesTools may assist email, copy/application drafts/version comparisons
What people remain responsible forExplanations/disclosure findings on gift restrictions, consideration/tax deductions
What AI mainly changesSchedules, data/charts are trial uses; efficiency unverified
What people remain responsible forMajor gift terms, budgets, compliance decisions/external commitments
Uses/responsibilities | Editorial five steps: define inputs, check drafts, verify powers/versions, preserve corrections/unconfirmed items. Not a universal statutory AI process. Automation depends on organizational procedures.
Donor priorities: Fundraisers/supervisors verify whom to contact, why/when; tools do not judge relationships/timing.
Messages/materials: Authorized staff verify truth/compliance before publishing external copy, applications/disclosures.
Consideration/restrictions: Authorized personnel or qualified advisers explain restrictions, consideration/tax deductions and retain records; tools must not generate conclusions automatically.
Records/data: Gifts, pledges/restrictions must be authentic/complete; limit donor-data purposes. No tool-generated unverified content or external sending.
Escalation/confirmation: Supervisors and legal, finance or compliance confirm public fundraising, disclosure, conflicts/data provision and record decisions.
Distorted information causes donor misunderstanding, lost trust/compliance risk
Control method:Verify/record before sending/disclosure; identify authorized people
Incorrect wording causes tax/compliance disputes/reputational harm
Control method:Authorized staff/qualified advisers confirm restriction, consideration/deduction wording
Sensitive/personal information may be disclosed/misused
Control method:Check lawful grounds, purpose, retention and entrusted/external provision procedures. No unauthorized-tool uploads; assess sensitivity legally, without banning all external services.
Distorted records impair thanks, disclosure, audit/accountability
Control method:Records reflect actual gifts/communication; no unverified generated content
Responsibility unclear in compliance/public-opinion issues
Control method:Identify/record review, sending/disclosure responsibility before adoption
Use tools in reversible support steps: public-information research/organization, list deduplication/field completion, email/copy drafts and event materials/schedules. Supervisors review donor priorities, commitments/disclosures.
Use tools for donor segmentation/contact scheduling, copy/application drafts/version comparisons, event/conversion/cost statistics. You and supervisors retain commitments, disclosures/restriction explanations.
Use tools for key-donor portfolio analysis, forecasts/year-over-year comparisons, event/channel comparisons and disclosure/report materials. You, supervisors and legal/finance confirm major requests, terms/disclosures.
Use tools for analysis, knowledge management/training. Policies, disclosures, compliance findings/major terms require human approval and records.
Insufficient evidence: Occupational AI replacement probability/near-term forecasts absent. The 28 relationship, strategy, supervision, budget/record tasks may guide tool trials. Descriptions do not prove permanent non-replacement or efficiency gains.
Source:O*NET13-1131.00 details: Tasks, not AI replacement forecastsOriginal materials ↗
Is coding needed? It varies. O*NET lists SQL, CRM, databases/Office and programming activities. Lists do not prove every job needs coding. Check recruitment/tasks separately.
Source:O*NET summary: Software/work activitiesOriginal materials ↗
No evidence supports a 'most easily affected' ranking. Try editorial public research, copy drafts, deduplication/statistics, checking grounds, authority/results individually. Task names do not prove automation, acceleration or adoption rates.
Source:O*NET details: Basis for editorial trialsOriginal materials ↗
Fewer jobs by 2035? Current BLS occupation 140.9→148.7 thousand, EP5.5%, OOH whole 6%, net 7.8 thousand. Annual openings 10 thousand include replacement, not Chinese or AI-causality forecasts.
Source:BLS occupation-specific OOH: 2025—2035 projectionsOriginal materials ↗
Can AI sign/approve payments? Output grants no organizational signing/payment authority. Authorized people check valid contracts, jurisdiction/procedures. Do not exclude budget tasks or treat generated signatures as approvals.
Source:NIST AI RMF: Governance, not signing/payment legal standardsOriginal materials ↗
Insufficient evidence: No disappearance year. BLS2035 occupational growth does not guarantee permanence or individual jobs; tool demonstrations do not establish disappearance dates.
Source:BLS occupation-specific OOH: Projections, not disappearance yearsOriginal materials ↗
Prioritize G/V2 to distinguish receipts, pledges, goods, restrictions/planned scenarios, recalculate, draft and preserve corrections. Then check target tasks. Software lists are not universal skill thresholds; artifacts are not fundraising permits.
Source:O*NET summary: Basis for learning tasksOriginal materials ↗
Editorial recap | Research, drafts/organization are trial uses; efficiency, adoption/job outcomes unverified. No guaranteed speed or unchanged relationships. Check powers, restrictions, versions/results against originals; commitments/disclosures follow valid jurisdictional procedures.
Insufficient evidence: No city/region-verifiable mainland occupational monthly pay. Do not substitute recruitment quotes, industry averages/secondhand accounts.
Insufficient evidence: No city/region-verifiable mainland occupational monthly pay. Do not substitute recruitment quotes, industry averages/secondhand accounts.
Insufficient evidence: No city/region-verifiable mainland occupational monthly pay. Do not substitute recruitment quotes, industry averages/secondhand accounts.
Insufficient evidence: Mainland Chinese national occupational wage distribution absent. NBS industry releases cannot replace it or establish starting/take-home pay. Limited access does not prove no national series exists.
| Educational background | Common job directions | Explanations/check suggestions |
|---|---|---|
| Bachelor's degree | Required-new-hire education survey | O*NET 90% bachelor's required-new-hire responses, not workforce education. BLS typical bachelor's; Chinese hiring unverified. |
| Master's degree | Required-new-hire education survey | O*NET 5% master's does not prove greater prevalence in institutional applications/policy jobs. |
| Post-baccalaureate certificate | Required-new-hire education survey | O*NET 5% post-baccalaureate certificate; fields/courses unverified. Do not add nonprofit management. |
| Other education/preparation | Conditions pending verification | Insufficient evidence: No samples of organizational entry conditions for associate/vocational training; do not invent universal support-role acceptance. |
China/US scope | NBS2025 urban-unit industry wages versus BLS US 13-1131 occupational wages/projections. Industry averages are not Fundraiser pay; US 2025 employer shares do not establish Chinese distributions. Do not combine/convert markets.
US BLS2025 religious, grantmaking, civic, professional/similar organizations 41%; not Chinese employer shares/year-end pressure evidence.
US education 25%, health/social assistance 16% are 2025 employment shares, not wage samples/Chinese distribution.
US professional/scientific/technical 3%, arts/entertainment/recreation 6%. Tasks may include corporate matching; Chinese CSR recruitment unverified.
Insufficient evidence: Quantified AI exposure, adoption/employment causality absent. Task-based editorial trials may include research, drafts, deduplication/statistics, checked against originals. Text intensity does not establish medium/high exposure, acceleration/non-replacement. Organizational procedures govern powers/data responsibility.
| Official annual pay, not personal take-home pay |
| Median is national midpoint, not starting pay or guaranteed experience-based increases. |
| Highest 10% | 90th percentile US$115,820/year (2025, BLS OEWS) | Official annual pay, not personal take-home pay | 90th percentile is a cutoff, not seniority, key donors, management or personal ceilings. |
|---|
Pay · 10th percentile：10th percentile US$46,630/year (2025, BLS OEWS)；Definitions | US 13-1131 national 2025 percentile. Boundary | 10th cutoff does not prove beginner status, duties or entry income.
Pay · 25th percentile：25th percentile US$57,480/year (2025, BLS OEWS)；Definitions | US 13-1131 national 2025 percentile. Boundary | 25th is distribution position, not causes of institutional/regional pay gaps.
Pay · Median：Median hourly US$34.88 / annual US$72,550 (2025, BLS OEWS and OOH)；Definitions | US 13-1131 national median. OEWS2025 | US 13-1131 full-time/part-time employee pretax regular-hours pay, excluding self-employment. Includes base, piece rates, commissions, production bonuses, cost-of-living/hazard pay； excludes overtime premiums, shift differentials, nonproduction bonuses/benefits. Do not exclude all performance pay, commissions/allowances. Annual usually hourly ×2080, not personal actual hours/take-home pay. Boundary | Median is not starting/take-home pay.
Pay · 75th percentile：75th percentile US$92,180/year (2025, BLS OEWS)；Definitions | US 13-1131 national 2025 percentile. Boundary | 75th cutoff does not establish seniority, duties, key donors/personal pay.
Pay · 90th percentile：90th percentile US$115,820/year (2025, BLS OEWS)；Definitions | US 13-1131 national 2025 percentile. Boundary | 90th/10th cutoff ratio about 2.5 does not establish attainability, causes/personal ceilings.
Is median entry pay? No. National midpoint is not beginner/personal starting pay; 10th percentile is not beginner pay either.
Can hourly pay establish personal annual pay? 2080 is general conversion, not actual hours, contractual take-home/annual income. OEWS2025 | US 13-1131 full-time/part-time employee pretax regular-hours pay, excluding self-employment. Includes base, piece rates, commissions, production bonuses, cost-of-living/hazard pay; excludes overtime premiums, shift differentials, nonproduction bonuses/benefits. Do not exclude all performance pay, commissions/allowances. Annual usually hourly ×2080, not personal hours/take-home pay.
Programs | Wages: OEWS2025 employee sample; industry wages: explicit occupational OOH table. Employment: BLS2025—2035 EP including self-employment. Distinct programs.
Income conditions | Check actual base, paid hours, bonuses/commissions, overtime/travel, pretax/after-tax, city/period. Percentiles do not establish personal causes/ceilings.
| Industry | Industry occupational median pay | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Religious, grantmaking, civic, professional/similar organizations | US$75,070/year (BLS OOH, 13-1131, May 2025) | 2025 occupational industry median, employment share 41%; not all other-services wages. |
| Educational services (public/private and state/local) | US$76,690/year (BLS OOH, 13-1131, May 2025) | 2025 occupational industry median, employment share 25%; not all-occupation education average. |
| Health care/social assistance | US$66,380/year (BLS OOH, 13-1131, May 2025) | 2025 occupational industry median, employment share 16%; not hospital patient-relations-specific pay. |
| Professional, scientific/technical services | US$80,840/year (BLS OOH, 13-1131, May 2025) | 2025 occupational industry median, employment share 3%; not all remaining industries combined. OOH also lists arts/entertainment/recreation US$62,250, share 6%. |
Income checks | Check contract base, hours, bonuses/commissions/duties. Occupational percentiles do not rank key-donor/support roles.
Income checks | CA page contains national/state values; United States is used here. National tables do not prove high-cost cities pay more.
Income checks | Verify conditions, experience/powers at target institutions; national distributions do not establish abilities/personal income ceilings.
Definitions | BLS13-1131 projection 2025 base employment 140.9 thousand, including self-employment 0.5%. Boundary | Not OEWS employees, China/recruitment.
Definitions | BLS2025—2035 occupation EP5.5%, OOH whole 6%. Boundary | Same period, different rounding. Net 7.8 thousand and annual openings 10 thousand are distinct.
Definitions | US projected openings (2025—2035 annual average, BLS OOH). Boundary | Growth/replacement, not new jobs.
O*NET interest baseline
Enterprising—Social—ConventionalInterest experience: Enjoy following prospects from first contact through pledges, thanks/disclosure, clearly explaining missions and reaching resource goals.
Understanding ESC: Enterprising (resource goals through negotiation/persuasion/initiative), Social (motivation from helping/service) and Conventional (procedural gifts, records/disclosures). Task preferences, not performance prediction.
Which Holland types are closer to Fundraisers?
Holland (RIASEC) | Explore relative Enterprising, Social and Conventional preferences. O*NET code ESC (Enterprising—Social—Conventional) reflects achieving resource goals through negotiation/persuasion/initiative, motivation from helping/serving others, and procedural handling of gifts, records/disclosures. Questionnaires generate questions, not fit/readiness judgments.
Do not use this way:Strong dislike of frequent external communication/rejection or impatience with gifts, disclosures/records cannot be removed by high interest scores.
Test my Holland interestsWhich Big Five traits are more relevant?
Big Five | Reflect on communication/records. Occupational score/competence-performance relationships unverified; do not claim high extraversion, conscientiousness/stability predicts adaptation.
Do not use this way:Do not abandon entry because a personality assessment says unsuitable; use volunteering, internships or simulated fundraising tasks/assessment.
View my Big Five traitsCan MBTI judge whether fundraising suits me?
MBTI | Reflect on communication/work preferences. Frequent procedural communication with donors, colleagues, finance/legal is needed; preferences do not determine competence.
Do not use this way:Types are communication references only, not predictions of your/others' fundraising ability.
Understand my MBTI preferencesCan Enneagram show whether this career suits me?
Enneagram | Observe stress responses. During fundraising seasons/event pressure, procedural checks of pledges, restrictions/disclosures matter more than types.
Do not use this way:Do not explain errors through types; check processes, pledges, restrictions, data/disclosures.
Explore my EnneagramCan I fundraise if weak at math?
Cognitive reasoning | Observe formulas, units/restrictions in paper tasks. Score relationships with learning speed/competence unverified; no ranking of abilities the work 'depends on more.'
Do not use this way:Scores do not show whether fundraising can be learned; test through volunteering, internships or simulated tasks/assessment.
Understand my intelligence/reasoningDoes fundraising need high emotional intelligence?
Emotional intelligence | Reflect on rejection/questioning expressions. Method validity/relationship-repair causality unverified; do not treat every tool as self-report.
Do not use this way:Editorial exercise | Draft a response to rejection/questioning and check against the exercise. Scores do not determine competence or guarantee training effects.
Understand my emotional intelligenceCloser fit:Independently own research grounds, pledge/restriction records, disclosure/data compliance
Note:Exploration prompt | Try paper samples of actual tasks then check conditions. Editorial advice only; interests, introversion/experience do not justify discouraging entry or required promotion routes.
View related occupations:This occupation (Fundraisers) directionCloser fit:Ability in strategy/team/budget management
Note:Exploration prompt | Try manager-task paper samples then check actual conditions. Editorial advice, not interest/introversion/experience-based exclusion or mandatory progression.
View related occupations:Fundraising Managers directionCloser fit:Ability in study design, data analysis/insights
Note:Exploration prompt | Try research-task paper samples then check actual conditions. Editorial advice, not interest/introversion/experience-based exclusion or mandatory progression.
View related occupations:Market Research Analysts and Marketing Specialists directionCloser fit:Ability in event coordination, suppliers/execution
Note:Exploration prompt | Try event-task paper samples then check actual conditions. Editorial advice, not interest/introversion/experience-based exclusion or mandatory progression.
View related occupations:Meeting, Convention, and Event Planners directionCloser fit:Ability in media communication, writing/crisis response
Note:Exploration prompt | Try PR-task paper samples then check actual conditions. Editorial advice, not interest/introversion/experience-based exclusion or mandatory progression.
View related occupations:Public Relations Specialists directionCloser fit:Ability in brands, marketing mixes, budgets/effectiveness analysis
Note:Exploration prompt | Try marketing-task paper samples then check actual conditions. Editorial advice, not interest/introversion/experience-based exclusion or mandatory progression.
View related occupations:Marketing Managers directionPersonality fit | O*NET ESC describes task preferences, not type/performance selection. Observe paper records, expression/grounds without competence conclusions.
Do introverts fit? Types cannot decide. 100% email/face-to-face, 95% telephone are occupational frequencies, not everyone's intensity. Try drafts/compare processes; no guaranteed support-role route.
Preparation | 81% typically over 40 hours weekly; 43% pressure and 62% speeches at least monthly but not weekly. BLS typical bachelor's; employers may prefer internships/volunteering. Chinese hiring unverified; try G/V2 first.
Pressure | 43% at least monthly but not weekly; 81% typical weeks over 40 hours. Not universal overtime/fundraising-season causality. Target/rejection/restriction scenarios are editorial practice, not health/accident frequencies.
Physical conditions | 57% sit over half the time, 45% moderate distance, 38% enclosed vehicles/equipment weekly but not daily; not inevitable travel. Personal medical/actual conditions unverified; no medical/hiring conclusions.
Education levels | O*NET required-new-hire survey: 90% bachelor's, 5% post-baccalaureate certificate, 5% master's, not education distribution. Zone4SVP7 to less than 8 is preparation level, not personal required years. BLS typical bachelor's, no related experience/no OJT. OOH says fields may include communication, business or social science; employers may prefer relevant internships/volunteering, not universally require them. Specific Chinese conditions unverified.
Insufficient evidence: Long-term personal health effects/year-end fundraising causality absent. Hours options are not diagnoses; verify work/rest/support by contracts/organizations.
Editorial transitions | Compare event, data, copy, relationship/coordination tasks then check jobs. Fundraisers already include strategy, supervision/budgets; no mandatory assistant-first ladder. Managers, research, events, PR, marketing, advertising/promotions, sales/training are adjacent exploration. Verify duties, experience/powers; no direct-transfer guarantee.
Education levels | O*NET required-new-hire survey 90% bachelor's, 5% post-baccalaureate certificate, 5% master's, not workforce distribution. Zone4SVP7 to less than 8 is preparation, not required personal years. BLS typical bachelor's, no experience/OJT; OOH fields may include communication, business/social science and employers may prefer internships/volunteering, not universally require them. Chinese conditions unverified. Some US states may require certain fundraisers to register; check states separately. Chinese organizational fundraising qualification is not a personal certificate.
Experiential verification | Independently check G/V2 receipts, pledges, goods, restrictions/errors and create four artifacts. Invent no replies, confirmations/real funds; task exploration, not fit scores.
Reduce risks：Use authorized policies/written confirmation for commitments/uses/returns; refer deduction statements to finance/qualified advisers. Report unauthorized/inconsistent commitments and correct records immediately
Basis：O*NET Fundraisers profile · NIST Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)
Typical scenarios：Scenario | Public fundraising starts before qualifications/filing are complete; authorities require rectification.
Main roles：Fundraisers/legal/finance; organizations/regulators
Possible consequences：Editorial failure | Launching without checking public-fundraising qualification, plan filing/disclosure may cause compliance disputes. Consequences depend on facts/jurisdiction, not guaranteed penalties.
Reduce risks：Work within qualification, filing/disclosure frameworks, retaining records under China's Charity Law/civil-affairs requirements. Suspend/escalate qualification, filing/disclosure problems immediately
Basis：O*NET Fundraisers profile · BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook: Fundraisers
Typical scenarios：Scenario | Conditional gifts accepted without restriction/consideration records are spent on general projects, prompting donor challenges.
Main roles：Fundraisers/finance; donors/organizations
Possible consequences：Unrecorded restrictions/consideration, misuse against agreed purpose or missing written quid-pro-quo disclosure; breached agreements/disclosure requirements, repayment requests, disputes/audit issues
Reduce risks：Record restrictions, uses/consideration individually, disclose/estimate value under processes. Suspend spending and check/escalate unmet restrictions/consideration immediately
Basis：BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook: Fundraisers · NIST Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)
Typical scenarios：Scenario | Donor names, contacts/amounts uploaded directly to unauthorized tools without de-identification/access controls.
Main roles：Fundraisers/information security; donors/prospects
Possible consequences：Editorial failure | Identifiable lists, amounts/contact data sent without authority or used beyond scope. Assess legal sensitivity under PIPL Article 28, not categorically.
Reduce risks：Data handling | Check grounds, minimum necessity, entrusted/external provision/retention; no unauthorized-tool uploads. Preserve originals/report under response plans. Do not call all external services legally prohibited.
Basis：BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) · O*NET Fundraisers profile
Typical scenarios：Scenario | Evidence/pledges scattered in personal email/spreadsheets cannot be reconstructed for audit; amounts disagree.
Main roles：Fundraisers/finance; organizations/auditors/regulators
Possible consequences：Missing/untraceable gift evidence, pledges, restrictions, thanks/disclosures; inability to substantiate, obstructed audits, donor doubt/reputational loss
Reduce risks：Retain timestamped gift evidence, pledges, restrictions, disclosures/thanks under standards. Report/review/correct gaps/inconsistencies immediately
Basis：O*NET Fundraisers detailed information · NIST Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)
Typical scenarios：Scenario | Donor liaison has a family relationship with a supplier candidate and joins selection without declaration.
Main roles：Fundraisers/supervisors; organizations/donors/suppliers
Possible consequences：Undeclared personal/financial donor/supplier relationships without recusal; conflicts, distorted decisions, compliance risks/lost credibility
Reduce risks：Declare conflicts and recuse from relevant decisions/reviews under policy. Report undeclared relationships immediately and follow policy
Basis：O*NET Fundraisers profile · BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS)
| Career direction | Starting tasks | Evidence to prepare | Samples without experience | Distinction from this occupation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fundraising Managers | Fundraising-data, event/budget register support | Nonprofit/project-management training/internships | Fictional annual fundraising plan/budget framework | Editorial emphases may overlap; target conditions/powers unverified. |
| Market Research Analysts and Marketing Specialists | Survey/data and competitor-material organization support | Research/data-analysis training/internships | Fictional donor profile/channel insights | Editorial emphases may overlap; target conditions/powers unverified. |
| Meeting, Convention, and Event Planners | Event materials, venues/supplier support | Event planning/execution training/internships | Fictional nonprofit event plan/checklist | Editorial emphases may overlap; target conditions/powers unverified. |
| Public Relations Specialists | Copy/media lists and public-opinion material support | Communication/writing training/internships | Fictional institutional communication/media plan | Editorial emphases may overlap; target conditions/powers unverified. |
| Marketing Managers | Channel/placement data, materials/copy support | Marketing/brand training/internships | Fictional marketing mix, placement/evaluation | Editorial emphases may overlap; target conditions/powers unverified. |
Education levels | O*NET required-new-hire survey: 90% bachelor's, 5% post-baccalaureate certificate, 5% master's, not education distribution. Zone4SVP7 to less than 8 is preparation level, not personal required years. BLS typical bachelor's, no related experience/no OJT. OOH says fields may include communication, business or social science; employers may prefer relevant internships/volunteering, not universally require them. Specific Chinese conditions unverified.
BLS typical preparation is not a vacancy. Verify US state registration separately; Chinese discipline requirements unsampled.
Chinese Charity Law separates public-fundraising organizational qualifications, plan filings, disclosures/cooperation. US OOH notes some state registration requirements for some fundraisers; check states separately.
Course certificates, organization qualifications/job powers differ. Identity/task lists do not confer signing/receipt/payment powers.
O*NET ESC sub-interests include public speaking, sales, management/administration, marketing/advertising and business initiatives; descriptions, not personal fit scores.
100% email/face-to-face, 95% telephone, 81% typical >40 hours are option shares, not universal conditions/health outcomes.
O*NET lists CRM Blackbaud, Dynamics, Salesforce, DonorPerfect; SQL/database/query/reporting; email, ERP, publishing, graphics, browsers/Office.
Lists do not prove AI adoption/universal proficiency. Practice independent checks of versions, restrictions/suspensions; verify real materials/powers separately.
G/V2 entirely fictional paper fundraising exercise | Organization O's school-supplies project requires project cash ≥15,000 yuan, including equality; no real fundraising. D1: A received 6,000 yuan unrestricted; B received 4,000 yuan restricted to this project's school supplies; C pledged 5,000 yuan unrestricted but unpaid; D gave 100 books valued at 2,000 yuan, not cash; E refused this contact, no real identity. Fixed costs 500 yuan paid from A; other costs unknown, not 0. D2 draft wrongly records B as 400 yuan; preserve it. D3 combines receipts, pledges/goods as 17,000 yuan cash and declares success. M draft matches subsequent new unrestricted cash 1:1, cap 4,000 yuan. Existing A/B, unpaid C/goods D excluded. Draft unconfirmed/unpaid. R: if new unrestricted 3,000 yuan arrives, M is confirmed and matching funds arrive, calculate scenario cash, not current reality. Q suspends real contact, solicitation, external sending, receipts/payments/publication and remains effective. Tool V1 claims all 17,000 arrived, A can count again and E contacted directly; check D1/M/Q.
Paper/pen, calculator or offline spreadsheet/timer only; no real organization, donors, platform/external materials.
90 minutes | 15 label versions/received/pledged/in-kind/restricted/unknown; 10 define targets/fields; 20 recalculate current/R and correct D2/D3; 15 unsent personal/corporate paragraphs; 20 handoff and V1 reflection; 10 check totals, units, equality, restrictions/suspension. Four artifacts: matrix, recalculation/correction record, handoff with two drafts, tool reflection.
Distinguish statuses from D1; preserve original D2/D3. List M/R conditions, Q suspension; public-fundraising/tax qualifications unspecified. Invent no approvals.
G/V2 reference deliverable | D1 current cash receipts=6,000+4,000=10,000 yuan. Deduct paid cost 500: project cash=9,500, short of 15,000 by 5,500. B's restriction matches this project; do not make it unrestricted. C is only a 5,000 pledge, not current cash. D100 books valued at 2,000 are separate, not cash. Preserve D2 original B400; propose correction to 4,000 using D1. D3's 17,000 combines 10,000 receipts+5,000 pledges+2,000 goods, not cash; target unmet. If all R conditions occur: matching=min(3,000,4,000)=3,000; project cash=9,500+3,000+3,000=15,500, meeting ≥15,000 with scenario surplus 500. Current remains 9,500, not achieved, confirmed or received. M unconfirmed, other expenses unknown; no guaranteed net income. Record C's pledge/grounds; do not contact E. V1 mixes statuses, recounts old gifts and disregards refusal. Preserve output/independent corrections; invent no replies, consent, signatures or resumption. Personal draft may tell A, 'Exercise records show 6,000 received; uses will be checked against project information; this draft is unsent,' without real receipts/deductibility claims. Corporate draft states M pending and asks about new-gift base, cap/receipt conditions, without promising established matching. Q still suspends external action; paper suggestions are not approvals.
Columns: material ID—requirement—evidence—status. Include cash target 15,000 with equality, cost 500, B school-supplies restriction, C unpaid, D goods, E refusal, M draft/Q suspension. Leave gaps pending.
Preserve D2 original 400 and D3 original 17,000. From D1, propose 4,000 and current 10,000 received / 9,500 project cash / 5,500 gap. R's conditional 15,500 has not occurred. Check originals; no experienced signatures/real replies needed.
List balance, restrictions, pledges/goods, M pending/Q effective, with unsent personal A/corporate M paragraphs. Invent no recipient identities, official invoices, tax benefits/approvals.
Preserve three original V1 claims; recheck each against D1/M/Q. Explain mixed statuses, old-gift counting/refusal errors and correction grounds. Without tools, check supplied V1; do not pretend tool use/another review.
| Stage | Potential checks | Observable evidence | Boundaries |
|---|---|---|---|
| Editorial example: Resume screening | Discipline/practice, writing/communication/data skills, compliance/service awareness | Four paper artifacts; list experience only with real grounds | Recruitment unsampled; volunteering/training evidence not mandatory |
| Editorial example: Interview | Donor needs, pledges, restrictions/compliance understanding | Live judgments on rejection, authority/conflicts | Scenario answers do not replace practice/assessment |
| Editorial example: Scenario test | Targets, segmentation, message/record-field design approaches |
Read G/V2, list project targets, five donation-record types and D1/D2/D3/M/Q versions. No real materials.
Label receipts, pledges, goods/restrictions from D1, separately recording E refusal; state no tax qualification/real powers inferred.
Independently calculate 10,000 receipts, 9,500 project cash and 5,500 gap. Preserve D2/D3 errors and propose corrections separately.
Write conditional R formula min(3000,4000)/15,500, labeling M unconfirmed/unpaid. Do not declare current target met.
Write unsent A/M drafts/handoff. Check restrictions, refusal, unknown expenses/Q suspension; no mentor prerequisite.
Independently complete four artifacts through the six sections of the 90-minute task above, then check the full answer. No donor contact/experienced sign-off.
| Qualification/preparation item | Applicable people | Occupational relevance | Universally required? | Obtaining conditions | Approximate investment | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bachelor's degree | Typical US occupational preparation | BLS typical entry bachelor's; fields may include communication, business/social science | Typical level, not every vacancy | Check organization conditions separately | Program length/cost unverified | Not organizational fundraising qualification/job powers |
| Writing/communication practice | Task explorers |
Typical duties：Under guidance, organize lists/data/donor records/contact support; no independent commitment/disclosure/restriction explanations.
Advancement evidence：Research, records/reviews; restate disclosure, commitment/data boundaries.
Qualification boundaries：Compliance, confidentiality/data training; CRM/office training.
Next steps：Learn research frameworks, writing/cadence with senior fundraisers; record daily learning.
Typical duties：Independently research/segment, write, contact/solicit, record/thank; report authority, compliance/data anomalies.
Advancement evidence：Segmentation, messages, pledges/thanks and review comments.
Qualification boundaries：On-job training, internal assessments/projects.
Next steps：Build donor/channel proficiency; practice messages, pledges, restrictions/disclosures.
Typical duties：Independently own key-donor/application goals, plans, negotiations/disclosure, guide newcomers and own pledge/restriction/record/disclosure quality.
Advancement evidence：Key-donor records, disclosures/mentoring evaluations.
Qualification boundaries：Training/organizational authority; performance/assessments.
Next steps：Learn major-gift terms, consideration, disclosure/conflicts, budget/cost optimization.
Typical duties：Participate in processes, policies, training/teams, handle complex disputes/guide newcomers.
Advancement evidence：Process, policy, training/dispute records.
Qualification boundaries：Management experience/appointment.
Next steps：Improve processes, policies, data, training, emergency/conflict mechanisms.
Typical duties：Support institution/foundation research, application materials, deadline registers/archives.
Advancement evidence：Materials, registers, archives/review status.
Qualification boundaries：Editorial preparation example | Writing, data/process learning; verify duties/authority separately. Assistant titles do not universally exclude disclosure/commitment powers.
Next steps：Learn funder requirements, applications, projects/budget definitions.
Typical duties：Research funders, write applications, manage budgets/progress/reports, report exceptions.
Advancement evidence：Applications, budgets, reports/exceptions.
Qualification boundaries：Organizational authority/project experience.
Next steps：Learn grant strategy, budgets, compliance/reporting/closure.
Typical duties：Own partnership strategy, application quality, closure/compliance; set standards/coordinate matters.
Partnership findings/project reports; policy/training records.
Typical duties：Support event materials/schedules, statistics, archives/disclosure materials.
Advancement evidence：Event, data, archive/disclosure records/review status.
Qualification boundaries：Editorial preparation example | Writing, data/process learning; verify duties/authority separately. Assistant titles do not universally exclude disclosure/commitment powers.
Next steps：Learn events, gift records/disclosure, data protection/charity law.
Typical duties：Execute events, manage materials/budgets/statistics/gift records, prepare disclosures/report exceptions.
Advancement evidence：Event, data, disclosure/exception records.
Qualification boundaries：Authority, training/project experience.
Next steps：Learn disclosure, consideration, data/conflicts/grant compliance.
Typical duties：Own disclosures, data, events/project compliance/training/liaison; set standards/coordinate.
Advancement evidence：Compliance/disclosure findings; policy/training/audit records.
Under senior guidance, learn lists/data entry, event materials/copy support/donor records; no independent commitment, disclosure/restriction-explanation responsibility.
Independently research/segment prospects, write messages/materials, contact/solicit, record pledges/thank; report authority, compliance/data anomalies under procedures.
Independently own key-donor/application targets, plans, negotiations/disclosure and guide newcomers; own pledge, restriction, record/disclosure quality.
Participate in processes, policy, training/management, handle complex disputes with corresponding powers/management responsibility.
BLS OOH links projections to ongoing nonprofit fundraising needs/online communication. Forecast explanation, not AI causality, actual hiring or budget/project-cycle effects.
What it cannot establish：EP includes self-employment 0.5%, not OEWS employees. US occupational projections, not China, individuals/recruitment.
United States · Exact O*NET-SOC 13-1131.00 (BLS OEWS, May 2025)
Median hourly US$34.88, annual US$72,550; percentiles US$46,630 / 57,480 / 92,180 / 115,820
Wages (median/percentiles)
National cutoff ratio about 2.5 does not establish institutional/regional/seniority causes, personal attainability/ceilings.
What it cannot establish：OEWS2025 | US 13-1131 full-time/part-time employee pretax regular-hours wages, excluding self-employment. Includes base, piece rates, commissions, production bonuses, cost-of-living/hazard pay; excludes overtime premiums, shift differentials, nonproduction bonuses/benefits. Not all performance pay, commissions/allowances excluded. Annual usually hourly ×2080, not personal hours/take-home pay. Some OOH occupational industry wages verified; do not register all industry data as missing.
Mainland China · NBS urban-unit industry average wages and bounded searches
Insufficient evidence: Chinese occupational wages/employment absent. No industry/US substitutes or claim statistics do not exist.
Occupational wages/employment (context/gaps)
NBS2025 urban-unit industry wages do not replace Chinese Fundraiser wages. Actual contracts, employment/classification correspondence unverified.
What it cannot establish：Annual industry definitions differ from US occupational wages; no combining/converting.
Related-ability relationships do not imply automatic promotion or no further learning.
Transferable：Strategy/annual plans, teams/volunteers/budgets/performance, key-donor/major-project negotiations
Skills to develop：Need organization-wide strategy/team/budget abilities
View detailsTransferable：Study design/data collection/analysis, market/competitor/consumer insights, forecasts/reports/advice
Skills to develop：Need research-design/data-analysis/insight abilities
View detailsTransferable：Plans, venues/suppliers/agendas, execution/safety/settlement, attendance/satisfaction
Skills to develop：Need event/supplier/on-site abilities
View detailsTransferable：Media, press releases/plans, events/publication/monitoring/response, brand/public communication
Skills to develop：Need media/writing/crisis-response abilities
View detailsTransferable：Brand/market positioning, mix/channel/placement plans, budget/evaluation/teams
Skills to develop：Need brand, mix, placement/evaluation abilities
View detailsTransferable：Advertising/promotion plans, creative/media, budgets/schedules/evaluation, materials/compliance review
Skills to develop：Need advertising/promotion planning, placement/material management abilities
View detailsTransferable：Customers, solutions, quotes/negotiations, contracts/collections, sales teams/performance
Skills to develop：Need sales, customer acquisition/negotiation abilities
View detailsTransferable：Training needs/design, delivery/coaching, evaluation/improvement
Skills to develop：Need course design, training delivery/evaluation abilities
View detailsEditorial comparison | Fundraisers also handle strategy, supervision, budgets, events, communication/tax explanations. Compare emphases; actual duties overlap. Titles imply neither exclusivity nor powers.
US 13-1131 | 2025 annual percentiles US$46,630 / 57,480 / 72,550 / 92,180 / 115,820; hourly 22.42 / 27.63 / 34.88 / 44.32 / 55.68. Median not starting pay; ratio about 2.5 does not establish seniority/regional causes. US BLS13-1131 | Employment 140.9 thousand in 2025, 148.7 thousand projected 2035; EP growth 5.5%, net 7.8 thousand, annual openings 10.0 thousand, self-employment 0.5%. OOH rounds to whole 6%, same 2025—2035 period, no conflict. EP includes self-employment; openings growth/replacement, not recruitment/ten-year net growth. OEWS2025 | US 13-1131 full-time/part-time employee pretax regular-hours pay, excluding self-employment. Includes base, piece rates, commissions, production bonuses, cost-of-living/hazard pay; excludes overtime premiums, shift differentials, nonproduction bonuses/benefits. Do not exclude all performance pay, commissions/allowances. Annual usually hourly ×2080, not personal hours/take-home pay.
Insufficient evidence: Exact Chinese wages/employment/code mapping absent. NBS industry data cannot substitute or prove no national statistics. Verify organization fundraising qualification/personal certificates separately.
Communication | 100% email/face-to-face daily, 95% telephone daily. External | 67% external public/customers extremely important, 67% continual contact. Collaboration | 60% teamwork extremely important, 57% coordination/leadership very important. Expression | 62% speeches at least monthly but not weekly; 52% letters/memos at least weekly but not daily. Hours | 81% typically over 40 hours; 43% pressure monthly but not weekly. Autonomy | 57% considerable priority freedom, 52% some decision freedom, 33% daily decisions. Environment | 62% controlled indoors daily, 57% sitting over half the time, 45% moderate arm's-length distance. Responsibility | 43% decision outcomes important, 48% moderate responsibility for others' results, 33% accuracy extremely important. Competition/travel | 57% moderate competition, 38% enclosed vehicles/equipment weekly but not daily; not inevitable travel. Response shares, not personal frequencies/health conclusions. BLS says some evening/weekend events may add hours; do not invent universally busier year-ends.
Insufficient evidence: AI exposure grade, adoption/efficiency/employment causality absent. Try editorial research, drafts/deduplication/statistics and check permissions, versions/results against originals. No medium/high, acceleration/non-replacement guarantees.
Education levels | O*NET required-new-hire survey: 90% bachelor's, 5% post-baccalaureate certificate, 5% master's, not education distribution. Zone4SVP7 to less than 8 is preparation level, not personal required years. BLS typical bachelor's, no related experience/no OJT. OOH says fields may include communication, business or social science; employers may prefer relevant internships/volunteering, not universally require them. Specific Chinese conditions unverified.
Qualification categories | Course certificates, possible US state registration, Chinese organizational public-fundraising qualification/job powers differ. Charity Law 22—27 distinguishes qualifications, filings/disclosure/cooperation; 29—30 targeted fundraising. Verify projects/procedures; identity confers no signing/receipt/payment powers.
Editorial risks | Use G/V2 to explore mixed receipts/pledges/goods, excess commitments, missing restrictions, unauthorized sending/broken records, not incident frequencies. PIPL sensitivity follows Article 28 conditions, not blanket lists/amounts classification. Verify cases/jurisdictions separately.
US BLS13-1131 | 2025 employment 140.9 thousand, 2035 projected 148.7 thousand; EP growth 5.5%, net 7.8 thousand, annual openings 10.0 thousand, self-employment 0.5%. OOH rounds to 6%; same 2025—2035 period, no conflict. EP includes self-employment; openings growth/replacement, not recruitment/ten-year net increase. Management, research, events, PR/marketing are editorial transitions. Verify conditions; no distance grades/direct-transfer guarantees.
On 2026-10-11 checked all 28 O*NET13-1131.00 tasks, context/education/interests/software, current OOH main-industry wages and EP2025—2035, regular May2025 Profiles national data. Reused NBS2025, OEWS methods, NIST/PIPL already read. Jiangyin's 2023 amended Charity Law link failed; read the same text from Quanzhou Civil Affairs to check Articles 22—30. No new authority invented for existing law registration.
Current access 2026-10-11; O*NET2026, wages May2025, projections 2025—2035, NBS2025. Directory/shared historical dates unchanged; cross-checked the same 2023 amended law on Quanzhou Civil Affairs this round.
Source register | Preserve old source identities; add ep-current, oews-method, pipl-law, charity-law for current projections/methods/statutes. Interest privacy is not PIPL; old ep ID points to O*NET details. Judge actual URLs. Internal employer supports editorial fiction G/V2, not an official employer test.
Usage limits：Occupational description, not qualifications/licenses.
Usage limits：Occupational description; forecasts not recruitment counts.
Usage limits：Occupational description, not automation risk assessment.
Usage limits：OEWS regular pretax employee wages, excluding self-employment. Inclusions/exclusions follow separate FAQ, not blanket exclusion of performance/commissions/allowances.
Usage limits：Insufficient evidence: Exact Chinese occupational wages absent; urban industry statistics do not substitute or prove nonexistence.
Usage limits：Original release index, not Chinese classification mappings/Charity or PIPL sources.
Usage limits：Interests do not establish hiring/fit conclusions.
Usage limits：Training paths do not equal qualifications/licenses.
Usage limits：Directories do not equal organizational appointment/practice qualifications.
Usage limits：Use United States national values, not California; inclusions/exclusions from OEWS methods.
Usage limits：Does not predict occupational job changes.
Usage limits：Not charity, tax/data standards.
Usage limits：Boundary/element checks.
Usage limits：Nonfarm establishment employers, not self-employment.
Usage limits：Release definitions, not personal pay.
Usage limits：Projections are not recruitment.
Usage limits：Internal rules, not external facts.
Usage limits：Trend displays do not establish personal opportunities.
Usage limits：Regional detail may be missing/unreliable.
Usage limits：Index without occupational data.
Usage limits：National definitions, excluding benefits.
Usage limits：Industry context, not wages.
Usage limits：Technology mentions do not equal ability/automation.
Usage limits：Not other jurisdictions.
Usage limits：Includes self-employment, not OEWS wage sample; projections not recruitment.
Usage limits：Includes self-employment, not recruitment/AI causality.
Usage limits：Statistical methods, not personal income/job conditions.
Usage limits：Statutory scope, not case legality/processing powers.
Usage limits：Organizational fundraising qualification is not a personal certificate; check activities/tax separately.
Usage limits：Not EP employment/personal income
Usage limits：Editorial ratings use the existing occupational responsibilities and AI task analysis on this page. They are not adoption rates, measured effects, job-disappearance or personal-unemployment probabilities, or official scores from Stanford or another external institution. No measured time weights or future robot deployment are assumed.
Chinese occupational/city wages/employment, recruitment/code mapping, AI adoption/causality, assessment validity and specific organizational activities/tax/state-registration procedures remain unverified. US national/OOH main-industry wages verified. Protection/shared historical-source conflicts in report; no whole-page acceptance sign-off.
MBTI (English) · Big Five (English) · MBTI (Chinese) · Big Five (Chinese)
Insufficient evidence: Exact mainland Chinese occupational wages/employment and US classification correspondence unavailable. This round checked NBS2025 urban-unit industry releases, not Fundraiser wages or Chinese employer distributions. BLS US 2025 main employers: religious, grantmaking, civic, professional and similar organizations 41%, education 25%, health/social assistance 16%, arts/entertainment/recreation 6%, professional/scientific/technical services 3%, not Chinese shares. Income checks | No samples of contract bonuses, commissions, hours, travel or assessments. Do not invent universal commissions/seasonality; check contracts/written duties individually.
Verification notes | Interfaces with finance, legal, communication, donors and partners define disclosure/commitment authority; clarify beforehand.
Verification notes | Gift/disclosure traceability shapes workload/accountability. Clarify versions, amendments and archives beforehand.
Check open-ended drafts against statuses, restrictions, refusal/suspension without prescribing exact wording. Invent no replies, receipts, confirmations/deductibility.
G/V2 involves no real fundraising/external action: no contact, receipts/payments, invoicing, platform tests or sending. Q remains effective; artifacts are not fundraising qualification, tax findings, hiring/fit evidence.
| Scenario tests do not equal independently owning fundraising targets |
| Editorial example: Probation task | Follow processes, authority/records; report anomalies/beyond-authority matters | Research, solicitation, record, disclosure/reporting records | Applicability/authority follow organizational assessment/policies |
|---|
Compare corrections, time/process interests; decide further practice/adjacent exploration by evidence, listing next materials. Artifacts are not hiring/fundraising permission.
| Task basis, not personal qualifications |
| Try two G/V2 paragraphs |
| 90 minutes is exercise time, not training duration |
| Not all recruitment/compliance certification |
| Data/software preparation | Records/analysis explorers | Corresponds to databases, reports/data tasks | Software list not universally required | Check actual system/task conditions | Training costs/duration unverified | Not relationship/tax determinations |
|---|
| Courses/training | People considering foundational learning | Verify course/task match | Requirements unsampled | Check enrollment/course conditions separately | Costs/duration unverified | Not organization qualification, personal license/appointment |
|---|
| Fundraising jurisdiction/data rules | People involved in real procedures | Check Chinese organizational qualifications/US state registration | By organization, jurisdiction/matter | Legally verify qualifications, filings, authority/data grounds | Procedure costs/timing unverified | Chinese organization qualification is not a personal certificate |
|---|
| Management/key-donor preparation | Coordination-direction explorers | Corresponds to supervision, strategy/budget tasks | No universal promotion threshold | Check duties, experience/organizational authority | Conditions/duration unverified | Occupation includes management; no promotion guarantee |
|---|
Qualification boundaries：Management experience/appointment.
Next steps：Improve standards, budgets, compliance/training/emergencies.
Typical duties：Coordinate projects, budgets, compliance/disclosure/communication; handle complex disputes.
Advancement evidence：Coordination findings; policy, performance, compliance/training files.
Qualification boundaries：Management appointment/organizational authority.
Next steps：Improve systems, data, performance/training/assessments.
Qualification boundaries：Management experience/appointment.
Next steps：Improve policies, monitoring, emergencies/training/audit cooperation.
Typical duties：Coordinate operations, compliance, data/projects/communication; handle complex disputes.
Advancement evidence：Coordination findings; policy/performance/emergency/training files.
Qualification boundaries：Management appointment/organizational authority.
Next steps：Improve systems, data, emergencies/assessments/training.
