Loading page content
Original Mini interaction reflection · Five full guides free
Use FermatMind’s original twenty-item interaction reflection and read five full guides free. See separate sums and means, without a dislike score, character defect or verdict about anyone else.
20 questions · about 6 minutes · no signup
Think about interactions you can recall now and rate how well each statement describes you, using the original five choices. The midpoint 3 means uncertain or depends on the situation and is a valid numeric response. There is no unscored option in this source form. All twenty valid responses are required before any personal group interpretation. You may stop, clear your attempt or read every full guide without answering. Do not use the questions to investigate someone else or obtain their messages. No result establishes who dislikes you, why, or whether a boundary should change.
Preparing the test…
All questions and full results are free, with no signup. Saving is optional; only saved attempts can be resumed after a refresh or language change. Tab drafts expire after 24 hours and clear on completion or retake.
The search title does not name a personality diagnosis. This is FermatMind’s original DISLIKED_REASON twenty-item Mini form, presented as five separate interaction readings. It asks no other person and cannot determine anyone’s real evaluation, dislike or reason for it. The source’s product-organised areas are not independently validated traits. You do not need to please people, overexplain, overpromise or lower boundaries to be liked. Every full guide is free and public before or after answering.
Each group has four forward-scored statements. Raw sums range from 4 to 20 and the mean is the sum divided by four, shown to two decimals without changing the exact calculation. Midpoint 3 is a valid uncertain/situation-dependent response. There is no NA, total, ranking, threshold or most serious flaw.
Missing answers suppress every personal group score and interpretation; do not guess a missing choice or use an answered subset. You may continue, exit and clear, or read all five public guides. Equal sums stay equal without a leading cause or an implication that several flaws are equally serious. The web form rejects unknown answer keys rather than ignoring them.
This projects the original DISLIKED_REASON form disliked_reason_likert_20, source bank/scoring 0.1.0-preview and result content 0.2.0-editorial-candidate. Twenty Chinese items, five choices, five groups and forward keys are preserved; English is a new working translation and examples are identified as editorial reading. No psychometric validation, local norms or Chinese–English equivalence is established. This is not the separate seven-group difficult-person form or a competitor’s quiz.
Read all five full guides first. All twenty valid responses are needed for personal four-item sums and means; midpoint 3 is numeric. There is no ranking, total or conclusion about another person’s dislike or reason. Missing responses suppress every personal interpretation. Public guides contain no private attempt.
These four items concern your reports of conclusions first, background, tone and timing, and conditions for receiving feedback.
These four items concern reports of pausing when you need space, explaining your situation and changes in contact rhythm.
These four items concern reports of explicitly discussing expectations of contact, task allocation and support.
These four items concern reports of time, resources, progress and notifications of change.
These four items concern reports of refusal, closeness, distance and ways of expressing boundaries.
No one else is asked. Your endorsements cannot reveal another person’s thoughts, a real reason for dislike, social value or a character defect. The title is a search entry to an interaction self-reflection.
No. The original choice means uncertain or depends on the situation and counts as numeric 3. This source form has five valid numeric choices and no NA. You may stop or read every guide without answering.
Every personal group score and interpretation stays suppressed until all twenty responses are valid. There is no partial judgement or imputation. General public guides remain readable.
None is selected. Five sums and means remain separate without ranking, severity categories or a total. Ties do not mean several equally serious flaws or a negative personality type.
No. A clear no can be a complete boundary without reasons, alternatives or approval. Safety and the choice to stop contact take priority over an optional interaction exercise.
All twenty items and five full guides are free without signup. Optional tab drafts clear on completion and expire after twenty-four hours. Unlike the Mini source, this web flow has no final-result cache. Copying uses only the public title and link.
Only self-reports are collected: no peer or partner reports, observations, conflict records or exclusion data. A group sum cannot recover a particular item response or show that a behaviour actually occurred. There is no social-value, popularity, character-defect or negative-personality label. A clear no needs neither reasons, an alternative nor approval. You need not keep contact, explain an unsafe boundary or promise to resume. With violence, coercion, control, stalking, harassment or threats, safety takes priority; reduce or block contact if needed and seek support you consider appropriate. Do not negotiate with an unsafe person to satisfy this exercise or recast protection as a defect.
Every action is optional. This is entertainment and self-exploration without completed reliability, validity, norms, fairness, percentile or accuracy verification. It is not diagnosis, an assessment of social worth or an evidence base for advice about a particular person. Do not use it for medical, judicial, hiring, school, admissions, security, partner-selection or relationship decisions, or for managing substances, gambling, self-harm, eating disorders, dangerous behaviour or withdrawal. Later differences may reflect context or understanding rather than a verified change.
Answers are processed in this page. Unlike the Mini form’s saved final result cache, the web uses only an opt-in tab draft, expiring after twenty-four hours and clearing on completion, reset or exit-and-clear. There is no saved final-score cache in this web flow. Incomplete answers never produce a final result. Copying includes only a public title and URL, never answers, raw sums or means; no disclosure is required.
Incomplete: not all twenty responses were valid, so no personal group scores or interpretations are provided. Continue only if you wish, or exit and clear. A web draft exists only if you opted in and expires after twenty-four hours; there is no final-result cache. Missing choices are not guessed, and an unfinished attempt says nothing about avoidance, courage or another person’s evaluation. Stopping for safety needs no explanation.
Unavailable: a source, scoring or content configuration mismatch stops interpretation. This is a version issue rather than a problem with your answers. Do not show an old result or a partial explanation, and do not require repeated attempts; look again only after a corrected version is available. This state has no interpersonal meaning and does not affect real safety choices.
Equal scores: two or more raw sums can be equal. Read every group separately without breaking the tie or naming a main cause. This does not mean equally serious flaws, many problems, a negative personality or a failed test. Different items can have equal sums without equal effects. No dislike conclusion or change in a safety boundary follows.
Website content edition 1.0.0 ·
Source question / scoring / report versions: 0.1.0-preview / 0.1.0-preview / 0.2.0-editorial-candidate