A description of selected experiences, not an identity
Read the specific statements, their context and missing information. Five separate readings remain open without assigning an orientation or type.
Three numeric ratings required; raw sum / 3. Agreement with the statements, not an attraction count, probability or population rank.
Different settings in a reported pattern
This part asks whether what you experienced as sexually attractive differed between situations, whether a quality had different appeal in different settings and whether attraction took a different shape in different emotional contexts. A higher mean records agreement with those contextual differences. It does not identify the cause of a change or claim that all attraction is controlled by circumstances. The questions concern your own experience, without asking you to rate another person’s orientation or infer it from how they acted.
One quality, two ordinary contexts
Imagine a quality feeling sexually attractive in one ordinary social setting but not having the same appeal in another. This could concern the setting, your understanding, the person or an aspect the form does not capture. The example does not settle the explanation. It also does not replace sexual attraction with a change in comfort, libido, arousal or willingness to do something. If you cannot tell which experience the statement fits, the unscored response keeps that uncertainty visible.
Variation is not a request to change yourself
Neither a higher nor a lower mean is an instruction to seek different settings, test attraction or make yourself feel something. The form does not recommend changing a sexual orientation or recreating an experience to obtain a preferred result. It supplies no evidence that a person’s feelings can or should be changed by someone else. You can accept, decline or leave uncertain any description without making a commitment to a relationship, an identity or a next action.
Similar means can describe different differences
A difference across social settings may be prominent for one person, while an emotional context matters more in another person’s selected experiences. Their means can be similar even if the individual answers differ. The three statements do not inventory every possible context, determine its importance or show how often a particular event occurred. The fixed twelve-month window also cannot establish a lifelong pattern. Read the specific statements and keep unknown explanations separate from the differences you remember experiencing.
Context and range answer different questions
Context variation concerns differences between situations. Breadth concerns the variety of qualities across your experiences, while continuity concerns similarity across points in time and separate experiences. A familiar broad range can vary by context without being contradictory. The report therefore preserves all five means independently and assigns no leading pattern. The original Mini’s confidence in describing patterns is a separate topic again; confidence does not establish the degree of variation you actually experienced.
Notice context without running an experiment
If useful, you could privately distinguish a remembered context from the attraction you experienced there. No person, location or private incident needs to be recorded. You do not need to revisit a place, change a relationship, initiate contact or attempt a sexual activity to clarify the result. The aim is only to make your own interpretation less automatic. You may decide no suitable comparison exists and finish with unscored answers; the complete guides require no personal score to unlock.
Three agreement ratings, with missing information retained
Use 1 Strongly Disagree, 2 Disagree, 3 Neutral, 4 Agree or 5 Strongly Agree. Three is a numeric neutral answer, not uncertainty or missing experience. Each part needs all three numeric ratings; its raw sum divided by three is displayed to one decimal. Ratings of one, two and four give seven divided by three, displayed as 2.3. Any unscored response withholds that part’s mean without zero, midpoint substitution or inference. All fifteen prompts need a response choice to finish, including unscored choices. No total, rank or dominant part is calculated.
An original reflection, not a standard orientation scale
These fifteen bilingual statements and five guides are original FermatMind content, without psychometric validation or population norms. AUREA and AVEN community resources inform the background distinction between romantic attraction, sexual attraction, identity, behaviour and arousal; their pages do not supply this bank or a scoring key. This is not an administration of Kinsey, Klein or another published instrument. Identity language remains your choice. Answers stay in current page memory, without saved drafts, quiz-flow statistics or personal-result sharing. Public guides remain available even when every part is unscored.