Original self-reflection questionnaire · Full results free
Rate 24 original FermatMind statements and read six complete motivation guides free. See each theme’s raw sum and exact mean, without a hidden-desire or personality verdict.
24 questions · about 6 minutes · no signup
Think about recent ordinary arrangements you can recall. There is no fixed number of weeks to use. Rate how well each statement fits your experience; the original midpoint means uncertain or depends on the situation. If you cannot give a numeric response or prefer not to answer, the clearly unscored choice is a website addition. All four numeric responses are needed for a theme; one unscored answer withholds only that theme. All-unscored can finish and read every full guide.
Preparing the test…
All questions and full results are free, with no signup. Saving is optional; only saved attempts can be resumed after a refresh or language change. Tab drafts expire after 24 hours and clear on completion or retake.
This is FermatMind’s original 24-item reflection from its mini-program. Six separate themes cover autonomy, connection, mastery, security, recognition and exploration. The original Chinese items and five response labels are retained with a new English translation. Read your four-item sums and exact quarter-step means separately, alongside six complete guides. These editorial groups have not been validated as independent psychological factors. The test does not read the subconscious, identify one deepest desire or measure ability, diagnosis or future choices.
Each theme has four original statements, all scored forward from 1 to 5. Add the four numeric values for a sum of 4–20, then divide by four. For example, 2 + 4 + 3 + 4 = 13 and 13 ÷ 4 = 3.25. Quarter-step means are displayed with two decimals. There is no overall total, ranking, winning theme or severity band.
The original numeric midpoint means uncertain or depends on the situation. The added unscored choice means no numeric answer. A theme needs all four numeric responses; one unscored choice withholds its sum and mean without changing other complete themes. All twenty-four selections can be unscored and still finish, with all six general guides open.
These are six editorial groups, not calibrated competing needs or verified independent factors. Do not select the largest mean as your deepest desire or treat equal means as equal needs. A smaller value does not establish that a quality or need is absent. Context, pressure, the people involved and available resources can change a response. Use the detailed examples to discuss a real arrangement.
Read what each of the 6 parts explores. Your complete result presents them together; they are not mutually exclusive personality types. These public guides contain no one’s answers or personal means.
Explore how having a say, choosing an approach and keeping some self-directed time relate to your current involvement. This is a reflection on four responses, without a hidden-desire verdict.
Read four responses about sharing important experiences, feeling accepted and wanting dependable company. Name the kind of connection you want without assigning an attachment type.
Explore what practice, manageable challenge and specific feedback mean in your current responses. The four-item theme concerns motivation rather than tested skill or future achievement.
Read four responses about clear scope, basic resources and reducing uncertainty. They do not measure financial security, courage or an objective tolerance for risk.
Explore what being specifically acknowledged and understanding a contribution’s effect mean in your current responses. The theme does not determine status, self-worth or another person’s opinion.
Read four responses about unfamiliar ideas, adding variety and trying another route. This theme does not predict risk-taking, creativity or your capacity for long-term commitment.
It organizes your responses to six current motivation themes. It does not inspect the subconscious, select one hidden motive or establish a fixed identity.
No. This is an original FermatMind self-observation framework migrated from its mini-program, with a new English translation. The six groups are editorial themes rather than validated independent factors.
Different groups or response patterns can produce equal arithmetic means. That does not establish equally strong needs or a combined type. Read the individual statements and the relevant situation.
It retains the original option: uncertain or depends on the situation. It is a numeric response. The separate added unscored option withholds a theme rather than filling it with a midpoint.
No. Mastery concerns reported motivation around practice and feedback, while security concerns reported responses to scope, resources and uncertainty. Neither is an ability test, risk forecast or career-fit score.
Yes. All six complete guides are public and free. You may finish with unscored choices, decline progress saving, read a guide without answering or stop here.
The Chinese statements and six themes come from FermatMind’s original mini-program. This edition adds an English translation, expanded original guides and an unscored response. Its partial-theme handling is a disclosed web adaptation; original complete numeric calculations remain reproducible. No reliability, validity, norm, fairness or predictive-accuracy study has validated this framework. It does not support diagnosis, moral judgments, hiring, admissions or decisions about ending relationships.
Progress saving is optional. If enabled, a draft stays in this browser tab for up to twenty-four hours and clears on completion, reset or explicit exit. The website does not keep a completed-result cache. Copying includes a public test identity and link, without answers, personal means or the situations you considered. Storage denial does not prevent finishing the test.
Website content edition 1.0.0 ·
Source question / scoring / report versions: deep_desire_mini_original_0.1.0_fm_en_working_v1 / deep_desire_six_complete4_sum_exact_quarter_mean_v1 / deep_desire_mini_six_full_readings_v1