Loading page content
FSCRS 22 working web edition: three separate parts
Explore 22 FSCRS statements about self-criticism and self-reassurance. Read three full explanations, skip any item and keep answers private in this web edition.
22 statements · Self-paced · No signup
Responses and calculated values stay only in the current page memory. No response storage, answer uploads, answer URLs or private-result sharing. Clear, reload or language change removes the responses. Public explanations contain no personal result.
Preparing the questionnaire. Please wait.
Explore self-critical and self-reassuring responses with all 22 English-source statements, a Chinese working translation and three complete explanations. Skip any statement. No total, winning type or diagnostic cutoff. FSCRS 22 working web edition: three separate parts When something goes wrong or you face a setback, how do you tend to respond to yourself? Read each statement and choose how much it is like you. The source specifies no fixed number of days or weeks to recall, and this edition does not add one. Responses and calculated values stay only in the current page memory. No response storage, answer uploads, answer URLs or private-result sharing. Clear, reload or language change removes the responses. Public explanations contain no personal result.
With all nine statements scored from 1 to 5, the sum is 9–45 and the mean is 1–5. A larger value means greater endorsement of these nine responses. If any statement is skipped, this part has no sum or mean.
Five numeric responses produce a sum of 5–25 and a mean of 1–5. A larger value reflects greater average endorsement of these five statements. No value is used to determine immediate danger, a diagnosis or a risk category. A skip leaves this part unscored.
Eight numeric responses produce a sum of 8–40 and a mean of 1–5. A larger value means greater endorsement of these supportive responses. A smaller value does not diagnose a deficiency, and a larger one does not establish safety or remove other difficulties.
The selected 2019 paper describes values 1–5 with the endpoints Not at all like me and Extremely like me. This edition keeps those values; the middle choices are numbers only. Other forms use 0–4, so their raw sums cannot be compared directly with this edition. No published norm or cutoff is imported.
The Chinese is a new FermatMind working translation of the selected English table. It is not presented as an existing validated Chinese version, and no FermatMind norms, validation sample or clinical cutoff are claimed. Source research does not validate this web edition by itself.
There are 22 statements and three separate parts. This is self-paced and has no timed score. You may skip any statement, finish with skips, or read all explanations without answering. The skip option and these web instructions are FermatMind adaptations.
Responses and calculated values stay only in the current page memory. No response storage, answer uploads, answer URLs or private-result sharing. Clear, reload or language change removes the responses. Public explanations contain no personal result.
Read inadequacy, self-hatred and self-reassurance separately. A skip withholds only its own part, with no total or winning voice. All three complete explanations and support information are available without disclosing answers.
This part concerns feeling disappointed, not good enough or defeated by your own criticism when things go wrong. It describes endorsed responses, not your competence or worth.
This part concerns harsh rejection of yourself, including disgust, name-calling, withdrawing care and thoughts of self-injury. It is a set of reported responses, not a label for the kind of person you are.
This part concerns being able to remember positive things about yourself, forgive yourself, offer care and encouragement, and still feel acceptable when things go wrong. Support can include taking responsibility and asking another person for help.
This edition does not assign six types or a winning voice. It uses all 22 English-source statements and the original three groups: Inadequate Self, Hated Self and Reassured Self. Each available part has its own readout and complete explanation.
The selected 2019 paper describes values 1–5 with the endpoints Not at all like me and Extremely like me. This edition keeps those values; the middle choices are numbers only. Other forms use 0–4, so their raw sums cannot be compared directly with this edition. No published norm or cutoff is imported.
Skip is an explicit web option with no score. A part needs all of its 9, 5 or 8 numeric responses before a sum or mean is shown. You can finish with every statement skipped and still read all three full explanations and support information.
No. Neither an item nor a part score is used as a risk classifier or diagnosis. If you may harm yourself now or need urgent care, stop the test and contact local emergency services or an emergency department; you do not need to complete the questionnaire first.
The Chinese is a new FermatMind working translation of the selected English table. It is not presented as an existing validated Chinese version, and no FermatMind norms, validation sample or clinical cutoff are claimed. Source research does not validate this web edition by itself.
Yes. All three full explanations and support information are available without a scored result. This edition keeps answers in memory and clears them on reload or language change. The public guide URLs do not contain answers or personal scores.
With all nine statements scored from 1 to 5, the sum is 9–45 and the mean is 1–5. A larger value means greater endorsement of these nine responses. If any statement is skipped, this part has no sum or mean.
Five numeric responses produce a sum of 5–25 and a mean of 1–5. A larger value reflects greater average endorsement of these five statements. No value is used to determine immediate danger, a diagnosis or a risk category. A skip leaves this part unscored.
Eight numeric responses produce a sum of 8–40 and a mean of 1–5. A larger value means greater endorsement of these supportive responses. A smaller value does not diagnose a deficiency, and a larger one does not establish safety or remove other difficulties.
The selected 2019 paper describes values 1–5 with the endpoints Not at all like me and Extremely like me. This edition keeps those values; the middle choices are numbers only. Other forms use 0–4, so their raw sums cannot be compared directly with this edition. No published norm or cutoff is imported.
The Chinese is a new FermatMind working translation of the selected English table. It is not presented as an existing validated Chinese version, and no FermatMind norms, validation sample or clinical cutoff are claimed. Source research does not validate this web edition by itself.
There are 22 statements and three separate parts. This is self-paced and has no timed score. You may skip any statement, finish with skips, or read all explanations without answering. The skip option and these web instructions are FermatMind adaptations.
Responses and calculated values stay only in the current page memory. No response storage, answer uploads, answer URLs or private-result sharing. Clear, reload or language change removes the responses. Public explanations contain no personal result.
English statements and the three-part key are reproduced from Table 1 of Halamová et al. (2019), citing Gilbert et al. (2004), under CC BY 4.0, © The Author(s) 2019. FermatMind adds original web instructions, a Chinese working translation, optional skips, the mean display and explanatory text. The 2019 1–5 coding is retained. This is not an author- or institution-endorsed edition.
Website content edition 1.0.0 ·
Source question / scoring / report versions: fscrs22_2019_1to5_fm_zh_working_v1 / fscrs22_three9_5_8_complete_parts_rawsum_mean_optional_na_v1 / 1.0.0