Show up for the part you actually agreed to
Explore Eijiro Kirishima through show up for the part you actually agreed to, a concrete everyday example and comparisons with the other five classmates. Full unofficial result guide and scoring limits.
All 24 questions require one choice. Each explicitly mapped response adds one raw count to one character, with counts summing to 24. Each of six characters appears 16 times, four times in every option position; an absent character is not a rejected response. Every highest count receives its full guide. Choosing A throughout gives four counts each and all six guides. No name or list order breaks a tie. Counts are not similarity percentages, powers, skill levels or population ranks. One additional choice has no established psychological significance; close guides can be compared without inventing a tie or secondary identity.
The fictional reference
Eijiro Kirishima is an enthusiastic classmate whose fictional ability is Hardening. This edition selects the angle of showing up alongside others for a commitment you actually chose. It does not test physical toughness, bravery or masculinity. Ordinary questions concern a shared first attempt, staying visibly involved and taking a manageable part. Supporting someone is different from proving loyalty by accepting every request or defending everything they do.
What your count describes
A highest Kirishima count means you more often selected shared participation or visible follow-through. That can make it easier for others to know which part is covered without guessing whether your earlier yes still stands. The tradeoff is saying yes quickly because joining feels good, before checking what the commitment involves. Useful follow-through begins with a realistic agreement and includes telling people when circumstances change, rather than hiding a problem to preserve a loyal image.
The first attempt together
Imagine a beginner wants company for the first round of an activity. You offer to join for one round and stay with that part. Afterwards they want several more rounds, but your time is finished. You can acknowledge their wish and keep the original limit: “I enjoyed that first round with you; I need to leave now.” Following through on the actual agreement does not require quietly converting a small promise into an unlimited one.
Compare the other five approaches
Iida clarifies what the agreement is, while Kirishima makes participation in an agreed part visible. Uraraka may reduce the task’s practical load; Midoriya may help through a specific observation. Bakugo names a challenge and Todoroki keeps the route chosen. You can support a friend by offering any of these, including an honest refusal. A Kirishima count does not establish loyalty in all relationships, and another result does not mean you abandon people.
Name a promise that can stay small
For an optional activity, offer one bounded part rather than a general promise to be there for everything. State when you can finish it and how you will say if that changes. You may choose not to make a promise at all. This is a practical clarification, not a courage test. The reading assigns no gender standard, risk tolerance, protective power or obligation to stand with harmful behaviour, and it cannot determine who deserves your support.
Twenty-four choices and every highest tie
All 24 questions require one choice. Each explicitly mapped response adds one raw count to one character, with counts summing to 24. Each of six characters appears 16 times, four times in every option position; an absent character is not a rejected response. Every highest count receives its full guide. Choosing A throughout gives four counts each and all six guides. No name or list order breaks a tie. Counts are not similarity percentages, powers, skill levels or population ranks. One additional choice has no established psychological significance; close guides can be compared without inventing a tie or secondary identity.
Original fan edition and source scope
FermatMind independently authored this unofficial fan edition, including every question, mapping, explanation and example. My Hero Academia and its characters belong to their respective rights holders; no affiliation or endorsement is claimed. The official 2019 film character page supplies limited fictional names and context, not current final-story conclusions or questionnaire validation. No dialogue, subtitles, character art, competitor question bank or result text is used. These ordinary learning and shared-activity choices infer no diagnosis, trauma, powers, intelligence, moral worth, gender standard, relationship fate, MBTI type or career suitability. They do not justify fictional harm.