A mandatory gap remains a gap until evidence or agreement changes it.
Compare requirements with the supplied evidence. Six cases practise bounded claims and honest unknowns, without certifying a sales qualification.
Your correct count describes six fictional tasks with stated criteria. It is not a sales trait, hiring cutoff or forecast. Every count opens every explanation and this complete guide.
A match in a worksheet is a narrow conclusion
The six fit tasks supply a small feature sheet, an offer or a documentation rule. A correct choice follows from that supplied material, not from knowledge of a real vendor. It does not prove that you can run a discovery call, implement software or choose a product for an actual business. Several real requirements may be outside the fictional comparison. Use the result to review the exact claim that was supported and the assumptions the wrong options added.
Make a requirement-by-evidence table
List mandatory requirements first, then mark each candidate as supported, contradicted or unknown for each one. A candidate needs every mandatory requirement to meet an explicit all-requirements rule. Unknown is not the same as absent, and neither is the same as confirmed. If a question names a verification policy, follow that policy before making a promise. Do not erase a requirement simply because a product is attractive or because a desired deadline is difficult.
Check two capabilities together
Suppose a fictional buyer requires a printable PDF and a portable case. In the supplied table, Birch supports both, Moss supplies a PDF only and Slate supplies a case only. Birch meets those two criteria in the table. This leaves its price, delivery, accessibility and other needs unresolved. Adding a new mandatory requirement can change the answer. A narrow match is useful information, but it is not a blanket recommendation or evidence that every implementation will succeed.
Separate missing evidence from a negative finding
When a document does not answer an integration question, do not jump to either “definitely works” or “impossible”. Preserve the unknown and identify the check required by the case. Similarly, a successful desktop demonstration does not establish every mobile or offline behavior. Read inclusions carefully: standard support does not silently become every premium service. These distinctions keep the claim tied to evidence without requiring you to guess how an undocumented real product behaves.
Change a requirement and compare again
After reviewing a missed item, change one fictional requirement or one row of evidence and recompute the match. Explain why the previous answer survives or fails. This is practice in transparent reasoning, not proof of a transferable selling advantage. Do not use the test as approval for a real quote or customer commitment. Its complete explanations and public guides remain available without payment, and English and Chinese counts have no established measurement equivalence.