Loading page content
24 original adult-preference items · Four full guides free
Explore emotional sharing, closeness, personal space and privacy with 24 original prompts. Read four complete guides free. Adult preferences do not replace consent.
24 questions · about 6 minutes · no signup
Current-page memory only: no draft or result is saved and choices are not uploaded. Reloading, changing language or leaving clears answers.
Preparing the questionnaire. Please wait.
For interactions between adults, answer only preferences and conditions you can currently confirm. Leave any item unscored or read the four full guides directly. Means do not decide physical closeness, publicity or partner fit. This website uses page memory only; reload, language change or leaving clears answers.
This edition preserves the 24 original Chinese statements, four six-item groupings and forward scoring from FermatMind’s Intimacy Preferences Mini. English is a new working translation without established cross-language equivalence; examples and full web guides add explanation.
The original Mini requires all 24 numeric responses before personal interpretation. This website adds an unscored option and supplies numbers separately for each complete six-item group. That is a web completeness policy, not a validated missing-data method inherited from the original bank.
Neither edition supplies overall intimacy, a dominant type, bands or norms. Reliability, validity and language equivalence have not been established for this bank. It supplies original self-report prompts and discussion material, not partner matching, relationship prediction or ability assessment.
This test concerns interactions between adults. Answer for preferences or conditions you can currently confirm, not on somebody else’s behalf. No name, age, relationship status or private history is requested. Without a relevant situation, certainty or a wish to answer, choose unscored.
The four parts concern emotional sharing, physical closeness and boundaries, time together and personal space, and negotiation of visibility and privacy. The person involved, environment and present circumstances may affect responses. The test does not require explaining those conditions to others.
The original numeric choices are 1 does not fit at all, 2 mostly does not fit, 3 uncertain or depends on the situation, 4 mostly fits and 5 fits very well. All are forward-scored. A 3 is an original numeric answer, distinct from the web edition’s unscored option.
Six complete numeric responses sum to 6–30. Divide by six and display the mean to four decimals. Responses 4, 3, 5, 2, 4, 3 total 21, so 21÷6 is 3.5000; a total of 29 produces 4.8333. These are not converted to percentages or population ranks.
Numbers summarize agreement with a group of mixed statements. Six responses of 3 and responses 5, 1, 5, 1, 5, 1 both average 3.0000 without establishing the same individual answers. Likewise, the closeness part is not an amount of contact, time is not a togetherness ratio, and visibility is not degree of publicity.
An attempt can finish after 24 choices, including an entirely unscored attempt. One unscored answer withholds that group’s sum and mean without zero or midpoint imputation. Other complete groups remain available, and all four public guides remain readable.
Before all choices are made, no personal result is shown. A version or configuration mismatch stops calculation instead of substituting old results. General guides remain general explanations; they are not presented as a personal interpretation already calculated from incomplete input.
A preference cannot replace either person’s clear, voluntary, specific and withdrawable consent now. Past acceptance, relationship status, silence, hesitation or lack of resistance do not automatically establish present willingness. No score authorizes physical closeness.
Most closeness items concern confirmation and pausing, not a contact-preference checklist. Shared and personal time can both be wanted. Visibility mainly concerns negotiation, not a demand for more publicity. Decide each interaction in its own setting and present circumstances.
The groups are not combined, subtracted or ranked, and produce no blended type. Equal numbers establish equal arithmetic results, not identical psychological meaning or perfect balance. Separate calculation does not establish statistical independence.
Results do not infer orientation, sexual experience, attachment, maturity, relationship health or outcomes. Disclosure, contact and persuasion are not required. Neither your result nor somebody else’s can demand participation. You may finish here.
This web edition saves neither an answer draft nor a final result and does not upload choices. Reloading, changing language or leaving clears current answers. This differs from the original Mini’s device drafts and result cache, a distinction shown before starting.
Copying supplies only public test and guide links, with no answers, scores, relationship information or personal description. All full guides are readable without signup, email or another assessment. Retaking starts empty rather than inferring answers from a previous result.
Four full guides cover emotional sharing, physical closeness and boundaries, shared and personal time, and visibility and privacy. Each group needs all six numeric responses for its own sum and mean. There is no overall total or ranking, and preferences do not replace present consent. Read every guide before answering, without signup or sharing a private attempt.
Review willingness, timing and conditions for sharing feelings in words. A tired-evening example separates wanting to be understood from an obligation to disclose or listen.
Separate everyday closeness, confirmation, comfort and stopping. Most of these six items concern boundaries, so the mean cannot establish how much contact you want or authorize an interaction.
Review regular company, time alone, separate interests and renegotiation. The six statements include both shared and personal time; the mean does not place you on a clingy–independent spectrum.
Review agreement before mentioning a relationship, social visibility, different audiences and shared privacy. These six prompts focus on negotiation, not how public or important the relationship is.
Four six-item groups explore words for feelings, closeness and boundaries, shared and personal time, and negotiation of visibility and privacy. They summarize only your own agreement with the statements.
The groups have different content and no validated rule for combining, ranking or offsetting them. Separate raw sums and means keep interpretation close to the statements.
No. Most statements concern present confirmation, comfort and pausing. The mean cannot identify a particular answer or consent to any contact.
No. This group mainly concerns negotiation and privacy. Someone who values discussion may want little publicity; audience, content and timing need separate confirmation.
No. One unscored answer withholds that group’s numbers without filling in zero or 3. An entirely unscored attempt can finish and read all four guides.
No. Different responses can share a sum, and groups have different content. Equal numbers do not establish identical answers, psychological meaning or ideal balance.
No relationship status or history is requested. Answer only adult interaction preferences you can confirm. Without a reference situation or wish to answer, choose unscored or simply read the general guides.
No answers or result are saved. Reloading, language change or leaving clears them, and retaking starts empty. Copying includes only public test and guide links, without answers, scores or private information.
Website content edition 1.0.0 ·
Source question / scoring / report versions: intimacy_mini_original_0.1.0_fm_en_working_v1 / four_complete6_sum_mean4dp_no_ranking_v1 / intimacy_mini_four_full8_v1