Loading page content
Original style questionnaire · Full results free
Take 24 paired choices about expression, response, space and repair. Read all 15 full public result guides, including ties. Free, with no signup.
24 questions · about 6 minutes · no signup
For each pair, choose the response closer to your current, more natural choice. Use experiences you are comfortable reflecting on; neither option is a correct answer. Complete all 24 for raw counts and a full explanation. If neither option fits or this topic is not useful, you can stop. No partner’s answers, contact details or private messages are needed.
Preparing the test…
All questions and full results are free, with no signup. Saving is optional; only saved attempts can be resumed after a refresh or language change. Tab drafts expire after 24 hours and clear on completion or retake.
How do you tend to open a relationship conversation: put something into words, check a response, adjust space or consider a repair step? This original FermatMind questionnaire compares your choices across four entries. It records this attempt rather than a fixed love type. All single and tied explanations are public, so you can read them before deciding to answer.
These are public explanations, not anyone's private attempt. Full reports cover all 4 single directions and every tied combination. Reading one does not affect your score.
Across these 24 paired choices, you more often selected putting observations, feelings, needs or arrangements into words.
In these 24 paired choices, listening, checking and noticing willingness to engage received your most selections.
You more often chose adjusting contact, leaving space or attending to timing across these 24 comparisons.
Clarifying impact, discussing another step and finding a way to resume cooperation received the most choices in this bank.
In these 24 choices, putting something into words and first listening were selected equally often, jointly above the other entries.
Stating something clearly and first making space received equal highest counts across these 24 choices.
Explaining a view and looking for a way to address a disagreement received equal highest counts in this attempt.
Checking for a response and first leaving space received equal highest counts across these 24 choices.
First understanding someone and looking for another step received equal highest counts in this attempt.
Pausing and looking for a repair step received equal highest counts across these 24 choices.
Putting something into words, listening first and leaving space received equal highest counts. The attempt supplies no unique leading entry.
Explaining, listening and looking for another step received equal highest counts, with no single leading direction in this attempt.
Explaining, leaving space and considering repair received equal highest counts. No single leading entry was formed in this attempt.
Listening, leaving space and finding another step received equal highest counts, without a single leading direction in this attempt.
Each of the four directions was chosen equally often across these 24 questions. This attempt therefore assigns no single leading direction.
Complete all 24 paired choices. Each selected option adds one count to its direction, which appears in 12 comparisons. Every direction with the highest count remains a co-leader. No item order or option position breaks a tie, and incomplete attempts receive no interpreted ranking.
No. This is FermatMind’s original comparison of four interaction entries. It has not completed psychometric validation and does not establish attachment style, relationship ability, partner fit or another person’s feelings. A lower count is not a deficit.
Yes. All 15 public guides are free and available without signup, including every two-way, three-way and four-way tie. They explain a possible count pattern, not a private person’s answers. After your own complete attempt, the matching explanation and all four counts appear.
You can stop or read the guides without answering. This original bank uses a required choice between two responses; it has no missing-option score or substitute zero. Partial answers do not produce a full interpretation.
No. Counts do not predict fit, duration, responsibility or relationship outcomes. They never require contact, disclosure or repair. You can use a private draft for reflection or end the activity here.
Saving is optional and tab-local for up to 24 hours. Completion, retake or clearing removes the draft. The copy action shares only a result name and public guide URL, without answers or counts. You do not need an account or a partner’s information.
Clear Expression concerns putting information into words; Attuned Response concerns listening and checking; Space Regulation concerns contact and timing; Repair Engagement concerns a possible step after disagreement. These are names for the offered choices, not measures of communication ability, empathy, attachment or maturity.
Every question compares two different directions. Each of the six pairs appears four times; each direction has 12 comparisons, with six options in each position. The chosen direction receives one count. The 24 counts are distributed across the four directions; they are not independent ability ratings. Interpretations wait until all questions are complete.
The highest count may belong to one, two, three or four directions. All 15 possible leading sets have their own full guide. Equal highest counts are kept together without using question order, codes or option position to choose a winner. A tied result cannot establish how responses combine or switch under pressure; a lower count does not establish a missing capacity.
For a fictional weekend-plan disagreement, compare stating what matters to you, checking what the other person wants, proposing time apart or asking whether a later discussion is wanted. The useful entry depends on actual information and willingness. You can draft one sentence privately or finish here; the questionnaire does not require a real conversation or predict the response.
This is FermatMind’s original four-entry self-exploration model, migrated from its own mini-program bank. It has not completed psychometric validation and is not a Capacity to Love scale, attachment test or partner-matching system. It does not assess someone else’s wishes or predict a relationship. Do not use these counts to decide whom to date or marry, whether to stay or leave, or who is responsible for harm. Violence, coercion or ongoing harm is not a shared communication-style problem: safety takes priority, and no result requires continued contact.
Answers stay in the page while you work. Only choosing to save adds a versioned draft to this browser tab for up to 24 hours; completion, retake or clearing removes it. A saved draft can be resumed after refreshing or changing interface language. Sharing copies a result name and its public explanation link, without answers or raw counts. There is no account requirement.
Website content edition 1.0.0 ·
Source question / scoring / report versions: 0.1.1-preview+web-en.1 / 0.1.1-preview.web-raw-count.1 / 0.2.1-preview+web-en.1