Original sensory response reflection · Four full guides free
Reflect on noticing cues later, adding input, sensory interruptions and reducing input. Get four separate response readings and full guides for everyday and work settings. Original, unvalidated and free; no diagnosis.
16 prompts · About 5 minutes · Untimed · Ages 18+ · No signup
What do you notice, add or turn down in an ordinary environment? This original sensory sensitivity test helps adults describe four kinds of recent response. Dunn’s four-pattern framework provides conceptual background, while these questions and readings are independently authored. You can read every full guide without answering.
Responses stay only in page memory and clear on refresh, language change, leaving or retaking. No draft, account, sensory recording or private example is collected. Public sharing contains all four guides, without personal numbers.
Preparing the questionnaire. Please wait.
FermatMind Editorial independently authored sixteen prompts and four full bilingual guides: noticing cues later, adding input, being interrupted by input and reducing input. Dunn’s four-pattern model supplies conceptual background only. The items do not establish neurological thresholds, axis positions or validated sensory types.
This is not the sixty-item Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile, its licensed short form or a translation of it. No proprietary item bank, manual, normative classification or report is reproduced. Published research and the professional publisher’s description do not validate these original questions or transfer their instrument’s evidence to this page.
Each topic has four direct items, rated zero to four on relevant occasions. All four numeric responses are required for that topic’s sum from zero to sixteen and mean from zero to four, displayed to two decimals. Frequency labels are ordered descriptions, not a calibrated interval measure, percentage of time or percentile.
Never differs from no opportunity. An explicit unscored answer is valid but withholds its own part’s sum and mean; complete other parts remain visible. All unscored responses can finish without numbers. No reverse items, imputation, total, threshold axes, highest-pattern classification, bands, norms, probability or diagnostic cutoff is used.
The past-four-weeks window and arithmetic are editorial choices. Both languages are unvalidated, with no established equivalence or meaningful-change threshold. Responses cannot establish autism, ADHD, a sensory processing disorder, sensory acuity, nervous-system function, workplace suitability or treatment needs. This is self-reflection for adults, not a child, partner or applicant rating.
No sounds, flashing images, tastes, smells, touch, movement trials or tolerance tests are supplied or required. The work suggestions are small, voluntary and reversible choices, not treatment or a sensory diet. Keep safety signals and existing support intact. Persistent discomfort, sudden changes or interference warrant advice matched to the actual experience rather than a questionnaire label.
Every complete guide explains a concrete situation, differences from nearby experiences, exact arithmetic, optional work adjustments and limits. They are identical public readings for everyone, free before answering and expandable after your response record. Four guides belong to one reflection, not four independent products or personal clinical reports.
Sharing copies all four public guide links without answers, counts, sums or means. The separate SPQ92 entry concerns published sensory-perception statements, while HSP24 and the sound-sensitivity entry serve different tasks. Choose them only if their methods fit your question; no answer or score is transferred and no further test is required to see this result.
Read without answering. These pages are identical for everyone, without personal responses or scores.
No. This is FermatMind’s original sixteen-item reflection with four recent-behaviour topics. It is not the sixty-item Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile, a validated short form, its item bank, normative classifications or professional report.
You may recall different responses across inputs and situations. Four separate readings preserve that picture without choosing a winner, calculating threshold axes or assigning a permanent sensory type.
These answers cannot identify either condition or a sensory processing disorder. Daily response descriptions do not measure neurological thresholds, sensory acuity or the cause of an experience.
Blank is incomplete. Explicit no occasion / unsure / decline is valid but withholds its own part’s sum and mean; other complete parts remain readable. Never means relevant occasions without the described response. Nothing is imputed.
No. Use ordinary recollections only. Do not create sensory exposure, intensify input or test tolerance for this reflection. Work suggestions are optional reversible choices, not treatment or evidence of a neurological type.
Answers stay in page memory and clear on refresh, language change, leaving or retaking. Sharing includes all four public guides only. Optional anonymous action counts require page permission and global analytics consent, without answers or part scores.
For published sensory-perception statements, separately read the SPQ92 entry; for a particular sound-linked reaction and impact, read the sound-sensitivity entry. Each entry shows its method, question count and time; no answers or scores are transferred.
View the SPQ92 sensory-perception entryView the sound-sensitivity entry